Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy screening in advanced hepatocarcinoma: A multi-center French study.

BACKGROUND: Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) has been reported for receptor (SSTR) screening in advanced hepatocarcinoma (aHC) prior to somatostatin analogue treatment. AIMS: To evaluate SSTR screening with SRS in aHC patients. RESULTS: Seventy aHC patients (63 men) aged 65 +/- 11 y were included, with alcohol, viral or other causes cirrhosis in 35 (50%), 23 (33%), 12 (17%) cases respectively. CLIP score was 2.7 +/- 1.7, with more than three nodules in 37 (53%) cases. Largest nodule measured 7.6 +/- 4.5 cm. Median alpha-fetoprotein was 574 UI/mL. SRS was positive in 25/70 (35.7%) livers and 7/17 (41.2%) metastatic sites. Positive SRS patients differed from others for tumor size (9.2 +/- 4 vs. 6.7 +/- 4.6 cm, p = 0.03), prothrombin time (PT) (75.2 +/- 15.2 vs. 61.9 +/- 19%, p = 0.005), albumin (34.1 +/- 5.9 vs. 30.5 +/- 7.2 g/L, p = 0.04) and Child-Pugh (6.7 +/- 1.8 vs. 7.7 +/- 2.3, p = 0.04). After multivariate analysis, only PT was associated with positive SRS (p = 0.028). Immunohistochemistry was positive for SSTR2s in 6/7 tumors (SRS uptake in 5/6 cases). METHODS: SRS was performed prior treatment, with images at 4, 24 and 48 h. For seven tumors, SSTR2 subtype was detected immunohistochemically. CONCLUSIONS: In advanced hepatocarcinoma, we report SRS uptake in 35.7% of livers and 41.2% of metastatic sites. SRS value in screening patients for somatostatin analogue treatment remains to be assessed.

Model for end-stage liver disease score and systemic inflammatory response are major prognostic factors in patients with cirrhosis and acute functional renal failure.

UNLABELLED: Although it is often functional at presentation, acute renal failure has a poor prognosis in patients with cirrhosis. The role of inflammation, a key event in the outcome of cirrhosis, has never been studied in this setting. We aimed to investigate the predictive factors of mortality in patients with cirrhosis and acute functional renal failure, specifically in relation to inflammatory events. One hundred consecutive patients with cirrhosis from 5 French hospitals were prospectively included at the day of onset of acute renal failure. Medical history, treatments, and procedures during the month before inclusion were recorded. Physical examination, blood and urinary chemistries, and renal ultrasound examination were performed. The presence of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), infection, and sepsis was assessed. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. The mechanism of renal failure was functional in 83 patients. Causes of renal failure were hypovolemia (34%), hepatorenal syndrome without ongoing infection (17%), hepatorenal syndrome with ongoing infection (16%), nephrotoxicity (2%), and multifactorial (31%). SIRS was observed in 41% of patients, 56% of them with infection. In-hospital mortality was 68% in patients with SIRS and 33% in patients without (P = 0.001). In multivariate analysis, only model for end-stage liver disease score and presence of SIRS, but not infection, remained associated with a poor outcome. CONCLUSION: The presence of SIRS, with or without infection, is a major independent prognostic factor in patients with cirrhosis and acute functional renal failure. This suggests that preventing and treating SIRS could decrease mortality in patients with cirrhosis and acute renal failure.

Changes in characteristics and outcome of acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage: a comparison of epidemiology and practices between 1996 and 2000 in a multicentre French study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the main changes in characteristics, practices and outcome between 1996 and 2000 in patients admitted for an acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage (AUGIH). PATIENTS AND METHODS: All consecutive patients (n=1165) admitted for an AUGIH in four French administrative areas were entered into two separate 6-month studies conducted in 1996 (n=712) and 2000 (n=453). Epidemiological and biological characteristics, endoscopic haemostatic procedures and outcomes were compared. RESULTS: Patient characteristics remained unchanged between the two studies; the two main bleeding lesions were peptic ulcer and oesophagogastric varices (30.2 versus 31.1% and 22.5 versus 20.3%). The use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or aspirin was more frequent in 2000 (26.5 versus 32.6%; P<0.03). Proton pump inhibitor preventative therapy was administered in less than 15% of patients with a high risk of peptic ulcer bleeding in each period. In patients admitted for varices bleeding, the use of endoscopic haemostatic ligation increased (17.1 versus 40%; P<0.001), with a concomitant decrease in endoscopic sclerotic therapy (76.1 versus 37.5%; P<0.001). We observed a significant decrease in AUGIH mortality in the whole group (11.7 versus 7.2%; P=0.03), and particularly in the subgroup of cirrhotic patients (19.5 versus 11.1%; P=0.05) whatever the source of their bleeding. CONCLUSION: Our time-trend evaluation of changes in AUGIH characteristics revealed that peptic ulcer and varices were still the two most frequent bleeding lesions. In patients with varices bleeding, endoscopic ligation became the routine standard treatment instead of varices sclerosis. The mortality rate decreased significantly over the 5-year study period in the whole group and particularly in the subgroup of cirrhotic patients.

Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with liver cirrhosis and in noncirrhotic patients: epidemiology and predictive factors of mortality in a prospective multicenter population-based study.

GOALS: To assess epidemiologic features and predictive factors of mortality of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). STUDY: During a 6-month period, a prospective population-based study including all the UGIB occurring in a geographic area of 3 million people was conducted. Data from cirrhotic patients were compared with those of noncirrhotic patients. RESULTS: A total of 2,133 UGIB were recorded, 21.9% in cirrhotic patients (n = 468). Endoscopic hemostasis was performed in 46.5% and 8.3% in cirrhotic and noncirrhotic patients, respectively (P < 0.001). Mortality during hospitalization was 23.5% in cirrhotic patients and 11.2% in noncirrhotic patients (P < 0.001). Six independent predictive factors of mortality were observed in both patient groups: a prothrombin level less than 40%, an UGIB occurring in inpatients, a concomitant digestive carcinoma, a hematemesis revealing the UGIB, a recent use of steroid drugs, and age over 60 years. Four other predictive factors of mortality were also identified in noncirrhotic patients. CONCLUSIONS: Although epidemiologic features, clinical course, management, and prognosis of UGIB were quite different in cirrhotic and noncirrhotic patients, the majority of predictive factors of mortality were the same in both patient groups. These data underline the major role of debilitated status and hepatic failure in the prognosis of UGIB in cirrhotic patients.

Terlipressin in patients with cirrhosis and type 1 hepatorenal syndrome: a retrospective multicenter study.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Type 1 hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is a severe complication of cirrhosis associated with a short median survival time (<2 weeks). Although the administration of terlipressin improves renal function, its effect on survival is unknown. This study investigated predictive factors of survival in patients with type 1 HRS treated with terlipressin. METHODS: Ninety-nine patients with type 1 HRS treated with terlipressin in 24 centers were retrospectively studied. Terlipressin-induced improved renal function was defined as a decrease in serum creatinine value to <130 micromol/L or a decrease of at least 20% at the end of treatment. RESULTS: At inclusion, the Child-Pugh score was 11.8 +/- 1.6 (mean +/- SD). Terlipressin (3.2 +/- 1.3 mg/day) was administered for 11 +/- 12 days. Renal function improved in 58% of patients (serum creatinine decreased by 46% +/- 17% from 272 +/- 114 micromol/L). Median survival time was 21 days. Survival rate was 40% at 1 month. Multivariate analysis showed that improved renal function and Child-Pugh score < or =11 at inclusion were independent predictive factors of survival (P < 0.0001 and 0.02, respectively). Thirteen patients underwent liver transplantation (92 +/- 95 days after HRS onset), 10 of whom had received terlipressin and had had improved renal function. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective uncontrolled study shows that in patients with type 1 HRS, terlipressin-induced improved renal function is associated with an increase in survival. Thus, a randomized trial investigating the effect of terlipressin on survival in patients with type 1 HRS should be performed.