Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BJOG ; 126(11): 1390-1398, 2019 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31240854

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To calculate the cost-effectiveness of implementing PlGF testing alongside a clinical management algorithm in maternity services in the UK, compared with current standard care. DESIGN: Cost-effectiveness analysis. SETTING: Eleven maternity units participating in the PARROT stepped-wedge cluster-randomised controlled trial. POPULATION: Women presenting with suspected pre-eclampsia between 20+0 and 36+6  weeks' gestation. METHODS: Monte Carlo simulation utilising resource use data and maternal adverse outcomes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cost per maternal adverse outcome prevented. RESULTS: Clinical care with PlGF testing costs less than current standard practice and resulted in fewer maternal adverse outcomes. There is a total cost-saving of UK£149 per patient tested, when including the cost of the test. This represents a potential cost-saving of UK£2,891,196 each year across the NHS in England. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical care with PlGF testing is associated with the potential for cost-savings per participant tested when compared with current practice via a reduction in outpatient attendances, and improves maternal outcomes. This economic analysis supports a role for implementation of PlGF testing in antenatal services for the assessment of women with suspected pre-eclampsia. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Placental growth factor testing for suspected pre-eclampsia is cost-saving and improves maternal outcomes.


Assuntos
Técnicas de Diagnóstico Obstétrico e Ginecológico/economia , Fator de Crescimento Placentário/sangue , Pré-Eclâmpsia/sangue , Pré-Eclâmpsia/diagnóstico , Complicações na Gravidez/sangue , Complicações na Gravidez/diagnóstico , Adulto , Biomarcadores/sangue , Análise por Conglomerados , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Idade Gestacional , Humanos , Modelos Econômicos , Pré-Eclâmpsia/epidemiologia , Pré-Eclâmpsia/fisiopatologia , Gravidez , Complicações na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Complicações na Gravidez/fisiopatologia , Resultado da Gravidez , Reino Unido/epidemiologia
2.
BJOG ; 116(6): 799-803, 2009 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19432568

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess the accuracy of fetal fibronectin (fFN) testing for prediction of preterm labour in asymptomatic high-risk women with a cervical cerclage. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. SETTING: United Kingdom. POPULATION: Nine hundred and ten asymptomatic women at high-risk of Preterm birth referred to specialist antenatal clinics and undergoing fFN testing between November 1997 and December 2007. METHODS: Women had fFN tests taken between 23(+0) and 27(+6) weeks' gestation, on one or more occasions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values and negative predictive values of fFN testing for predicting delivery <30 and <37 weeks were compared in those with and without cerclage. RESULTS: For delivery <30 weeks' gestation, the specificity of fFN testing was significantly lower in women with cervical cerclage (77% vs 90%; P < or = 0.00001). The sensitivity of the test was similar between the groups (78.6 (no-cerclage) vs 60% (cerclage); P > 0.4). The negative predictive value of the fFN test for delivery <30 weeks was high in both groups (>98%). CONCLUSIONS: Asymptomatic high-risk women with cerclage in situ are more likely to have a false positive fFN test. The negative predictive value is similar.


Assuntos
Cerclagem Cervical , Fibronectinas/análise , Trabalho de Parto Prematuro/diagnóstico , Adulto , Biomarcadores/análise , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Reações Falso-Positivas , Feminino , Humanos , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Trabalho de Parto Prematuro/prevenção & controle , Gravidez , Cuidado Pré-Natal/métodos , Prognóstico , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...