Long-term efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate powder administered once or twice daily via inhaler to patients with moderate asthma.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate administered as a once-daily or twice-daily regimen over a period of 1 year to patients with moderate asthma. DESIGN: Double-blind, randomized, parallel group, and placebo-controlled phase (12 weeks) and an open-label phase (54 weeks). SETTING: Multicenter study in an outpatient setting. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (n = 253; age, > or = 12 years) with a mean FEV(1) of 67% predicted normal were stratified according to baseline therapy of maintenance inhaled corticosteroids vs beta(2)-agonists alone. MEASUREMENTS AND INTERVENTIONS: Fluticasone propionate (250 microg bid or 500 microg qd) or placebo (bid) was administered via the Diskus multidose powder inhaler (Glaxo Wellcome; Research Triangle Park, NC) for 12 weeks. During open-label treatment, patients were re-randomized to once-daily or twice-daily fluticasone propionate. RESULTS: Compared to placebo, fluticasone propionate administered qd or bid significantly improved FEV(1) (p < 0.001), morning (p < 0.001) and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF; p < 0.001), asthma symptom scores (p < or = 0.001), and albuterol use (p

Equivalence in periodontal trials: a description for the clinician.

There has been a tendency by clinicians in periodontal research to confuse lack of significance in a clinical trial designed for superiority for equivalence between the treatment arms. This paper is intended to define for the clinician what equivalency means in statistical terms. To demonstrate equivalence, the hypotheses and analysis specific to equivalence must be carried out; the information cannot be extracted directly from trials designed with superiority hypotheses and analysis. Further, acceptable mean differences in equivalency trials should be determined based not only on statistical considerations, but also on the clinical relevance of the proposed differences. The relationship between superiority and equivalency design and analysis is discussed and an example using a hypothetical clinical study is given.

Comparison of a bioabsorbable GTR barrier to a non-absorbable barrier in treating human class II furcation defects. A multi-center parallel design randomized single-blind trial.

This multi-center single-blind study compared clinical outcomes following guided tissue regeneration (GTR) treating human Class II furcation defects with a new polylactic-acid-based bioabsorbable barrier (test treatment) or a non-absorbable ePTFE barrier (control treatment). Clinical parameters evaluated were change in vertical attachment level (VAL), horizontal attachment level (HAL), probing depth (PD), and gingival margin location (REC). Surgical treatment resulted in clinically and statistically equivalent changes when comparisons were made between test and control treatments. VAL gain was 2.0 mm for test and 1.6 mm for control groups; HAL gain was 2.1 mm for both test and control groups. PD reduction was 2.3 mm for the test group and 2.1 mm for the control group. Test sites experienced an additional 0.3 mm of recession beyond baseline; control sites, 0.5 mm. Within-group comparisons showed that the amount of recession was not significantly different from baseline in the test group. Recession in the control group was significantly different from baseline. All other parameters in both the test and control groups were significantly different from baseline. Evaluation of safety data indicated no significant differences between test and control treatments, although there was a strong trend for the control group to have more postoperative abscess or suppuration than test sites (control = 11; test = 4; P = 0.06).

Multi-center comparative evaluation of subgingivally delivered sanguinarine and doxycycline in the treatment of periodontitis. I. Study design, procedures, and management.

The design and conduct of a 9-month multi-center clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of subgingivally delivered 5% sanguinarium chloride (SC) and 10% doxycycline hyclate (DH) from a biodegradable drug delivery system in the treatment of adult periodontitis is described. The 3-group randomized study of 180 adults with moderate to severe periodontitis was a modified double-blind parallel design. One group received DH, one group received SC, and the other group received the vehicle control (VC). Patients selected had two quadrants with a minimum of four periodontal pockets > or = 5 mm in depth with two sites > or = 7 mm. All qualifying sites exhibited bleeding on gentle probing. Qualifying sites were treated at baseline and again at 4 months. Clinical response was assessed by measuring attachment level, probing depth, and bleeding on probing at monthly examinations at qualifying sites and the entire dentition. The plaque index was measured monthly to verify oral hygiene status. The parallel design afforded the opportunity to distinguish between treatment effectiveness of SC, DH, and VC independent of possible crossover effects. Also the effectiveness of oral hygiene in untreated sites of the mouth could be evaluated. Finally, treatment effects in moderate (5 to 6 mm) and deep (> or = 7 mm) pockets in both treated and untreated sites could be compared. The design was capable of simulating a periodontal practice maintenance program and assessing the response according to maintenance and treatment history. Study management procedures that emphasized center examiner and therapist training and adherence to protocol and procedures to reduce variability are described.

Multi-center comparative evaluation of subgingivally delivered sanguinarine and doxycycline in the treatment of periodontitis. II. Clinical results.

The clinical safety and effectiveness of a subgingivally delivered biodegradable drug delivery system containing either 10% doxycycline hyclate (DH), 5% sanguinarium chloride (SC) or no agent (VC) was evaluated in a 9-month multi-center trial. The study was a randomized parallel design with 180 patients who demonstrated moderate to severe periodontitis. All patients had at least two quadrants with a minimum of four qualifying pockets > or = 5 mm that bled on probing. Two of the qualifying pockets were required to be > or = 7 mm. At baseline and at 4 months all qualified sites were treated with the test article administered via syringe. Probing depth reduction (PDR), attachment level gain (ALG), bleeding on probing reduction (BOP), and plaque index were determined monthly. Analysis of efficacy data from the 173 efficacy-evaluable patients indicated that all treatments gave significant positive clinical changes from baseline at all subsequent timepoints. DH was superior to SC and VC in PDR at all timepoints (P < or = 0.01 to 0.001) with a maximum reduction of 2.0 mm at 5 months. For ALG, DH was superior to VC at months 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, and 9 (P < or = 0.04 to 0.002) and superior to SC at months 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 (P < or = 0.01 to 0.001) with a maximum ALG of 1.2 mm at 6 months. For BOP reduction, DH was superior to VC at all time points (P < or = 0.05) and to SC at months 3, 5, 6, 8, and 9 (P < or = 0.03). For DH, the maximum ALG in deep (> or = 7 mm) pockets was 1.7 mm and PDR 2.9 mm compared to 0.8 mm and 1.6 mm, respectively for moderate (5 to 6 mm) pockets. Test articles were applied without anesthesia and no serious adverse events occurred in the trial. The results of this study indicate that 10% doxycycline hyclate delivered in a biodegradable delivery system is an effective means of reducing the clinical signs of adult periodontitis and exhibits a benign safety profile.

Whole mouth microbiota effects following subgingival delivery of sanguinarium.

An increased incidence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and yeast overgrowth has been reported following various periodontal treatments. The objective of this study was to detect possible overgrowth of opportunistic bacteria and fungi as well as changes in normal microbiota after application of a biodegradable delivery system containing 5% sanguinarium (ABDS-S) to one quadrant in a split-mouth study. An oral hygiene quadrant served as a control. The ABDS-S treated and control periodontal sites as well as the saliva of 17 subjects were sampled prior to treatment, immediately after ABDS-S removal at 7 days, and again at 30 and 60 days. At Day 7 sanguinarium-resistant bacteria increased in both control and ABDS-S periodontal sites as well as in the saliva. Enteric Gram-negative bacilli in both control and ABDS-S periodontal sites were 2.2 to 3.4 log colony forming units higher at Day 7 compared to baseline. This overgrowth was transient in that levels became undetectable at Days 30 and 60. No such overgrowth was observed for C. albicans or other fungi, or for S. aureus or other staphylococci in any periodontal sites. Levels of Actinomyces increased at Days 30 and 60 in both control and ABDS-S sites as well as saliva. These changes strongly suggest that a 7 day ABDS-S treatment in one quadrant of the mouth led to significant microbiota changes in the treated and control quadrants as well as in the saliva. Future microbial studies involving antimicrobials delivered by local delivery systems must consider the crossover effects of treatment inherent in the split-mouth design.