RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The unmet challenge in prostate cancer (PCa) management is to discriminate it from benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) due to the lack of specific diagnostic biomarkers. Contemporary research on potential PCa biomarkers is directed toward methylated cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from liquid biopsies since epigenetic mechanisms are strongly involved in PCa development. METHODS: In the present research, cfDNA methylation of the LGALS3 gene in blood and seminal plasma of PCa and BPH patients was assessed using pyrosequencing, as well as LGALS3 DNA methylation in tissue biopsies. Liquid biopsy samples were taken from patients with clinical suspicion of PCa, who were subsequently divided into two groups, that is, 42 with PCa and 55 with BPH, according to the histopathological analysis. RESULTS: Statistically significant higher cfDNA methylation of LGALS3 in seminal plasma of BPH than in PCa patients was detected by pyrosequencing. ROC curve analysis showed that it could distinguish PCa and BPH patients with 56.4% sensitivity and 70.4% specificity, while PSA did not differ between the two patient groups. In contrast, there was no statistically significant difference in LGALS3 cfDNA methylation in blood plasma between the two patient groups. In prostate tumor tissue, there was a statistically significant DNA hypermethylation of LGALS3 compared to surrounding nontumor tissue and BPH tissue. CONCLUSIONS: The DNA hypermethylation of the LGALS3 gene represents an event specific to PCa development. In conclusion, LGALS3 cfDNA methylation in seminal fluid discriminates early PCa and BPH presenting itself as a powerful novel PCa biomarker highly outperforming PSA.
RESUMO
Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in men. Diagnosis of prostate cancer poses a significant challenge, due to several different key parameters that need to be evaluated, such as age, history of prostate specific antigen (PSA), clinical examination and more recently magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The current diagnostic pathway for prostate cancer has resulted in overdiagnosis and overtreatment as well as underdiagnosis and missed diagnoses in many men. Multiparametric MRI (mp-MRI) of the prostate has been identified as a test that could alleviate these diagnostic errors. Before prostate cancer treatment pathological confirmation is mandatory. Prostate biopsy is an invasive procedure with rare but not negligible potential complications. There are several methods of prostate biopsy of which most common are systemic or planar prostate biopsy and cognitive or targeted MRI-guided prostate biopsy. Multiparametric MRI has demonstrated better accuracy and reproducibility in detecting, locating and evaluating prostate cancer and also sparing some men unnecessary biopsies. Recent studies have shown a mpMRI benefit for better procedure planning regarding prostate cancer location, extent of disease and length of the urethra. There are still some challenges ahead, such as ensuring high-quality execution and reporting of mpMRI and ensuring that this diagnostic pathway is cost-effective. According to the latest urological clinical guidelines mpMRI became fundamental tool in management of prostate cancer. The aim of this study is to give a brief insight in use of mpMRI in prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment.
