A cluster of gram-negative bloodstream infections in Connecticut hemodialysis patients associated with contaminated wall boxes and prime buckets.

BACKGROUND: Maintenance hemodialysis (HD) patients are at increased risk of bloodstream infections (BSI). We investigated a cluster of Delftia acidovorans infections among patients undergoing HD at an outpatient unit (Facility A). METHODS: A case was defined as a Facility A HD patient with ≥1 culture positive for D acidovorans between February 1 and April 30, 2018. An investigation included review of patient records, facility policies, practice observations, and environmental cultures. RESULTS: The cluster included 2 patients with confirmed D acidovorans BSI. Both patients had recently been dialyzed at Station #2, where a wall box culture yielded D acidovorans. One patient also had a BSI due to Enterobacter asburiae, which was recovered from several other wall boxes and saline prime buckets (SPB). Observations revealed leakage of wastewater from wall boxes onto the floor, and that SPBs were not always disinfected and dried appropriately before reuse. Multiple deficiencies in hand hygiene and station disinfection were observed. No deficiencies in water treatment practices were identified, and water cultures were negative for the observed pathogens. CONCLUSIONS: The cluster of D acidovorans infections was most likely due to indirect exposures to contaminated wall boxes and possibly SPBs due to poor hand hygiene and station disinfection.

A multi-center outbreak of Candida tropicalis bloodstream infections associated with contaminated hemodialysis machine prime buckets.

BACKGROUND: Outbreaks of fungal bloodstream infection (BSI) are uncommon among hemodialysis patients. We investigated an outbreak of Candida tropicalis BSIs involving patients at 3 of 4 affiliated hemodialysis units. METHODS: An investigation included a review of records of patients with C tropicalis BSI, a case-control study, and cultures of medications, hands of personnel, dialysis equipment, and water samples. RESULTS: Eight patients developed C tropicalis BSIs in a 3-month period. Compared to controls, cases had a higher proportion of preceding dialyses performed on a machine with a contaminated saline prime bucket (SPB) (P= .02). Observations revealed that SPBs at units A-C were rinsed with tap water, were not routinely disinfected, and that priming tubing was allowed to contact fluid in SPBs. C tropicalis was recovered from the main compartment and hollow handle of SPBs and from other environmental samples. C tropicalis isolates from patients, SPBs and other environmental samples had indistinguishable pulsed-field gel electrophoresis patterns. Following routine disinfection of SPBs, the outbreak terminated. CONCLUSIONS: This outbreak was likely due to inadequate disinfection of SPBs. The findings emphasize the importance of disinfection of SPBs. Current use of identical SPBs warrants further evaluation of hollow SPB handles as a potential infection risk.

Comparison of fluorescent marker systems with 2 quantitative methods of assessing terminal cleaning practices.

OBJECTIVE: To compare fluorescent markers with aerobic colony counts (ACCs) and an adenosine triphosphate (ATP) bioluminescence assay system for assessing terminal cleaning practices. DESIGN: A prospective observational survey. SETTING: A 500-bed university-affiliated community teaching hospital. METHODS: In a convenience sample of 100 hospital rooms, 5 high-touch surfaces were marked with fluorescent markers before terminal cleaning and checked after cleaning to see whether the marker had been entirely or partially removed. ACC and ATP readings were performed on the same surfaces before and after terminal cleaning. RESULTS: Overall, 378 (76%) of 500 surfaces were classified as having been cleaned according to fluorescent markers, compared with 384 (77%) according to ACC criteria and 225 (45%) according to ATP criteria. Of 382 surfaces classified as not clean according to ATP criteria before terminal cleaning, those with the marker removed were significantly more likely than those with the marker partially removed to be classified as clean according to ATP criteria (P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: Fluorescent markers are useful in determining how frequently high-touch surfaces are wiped during terminal cleaning. However, contaminated surfaces classified as clean according to fluorescent marker criteria after terminal cleaning were significantly less likely to be classified as clean according to ACC and ATP assays.

Cleanliness of portable medical equipment disinfected by nursing staff.

Increased attention has been focused on disinfection by housekeepers, but few data are available on disinfection of equipment by nurses. We used adenosine triphosphate bioluminescence assays and aerobic cultures to assess the cleanliness of portable medical equipment disinfected by nurses between each patient use. We found that the equipment was not being disinfected as per protocol and that education and feedback to nursing are warranted to improve disinfection of medical equipment.

Who is really caring for your environment of care? Developing standardized cleaning procedures and effective monitoring techniques.

Health care facilities have procedures for cleaning patient care environments, but there is often confusion about the division of labor when it comes to cleaning responsibilities. In addition, systems to monitor cleaning effectiveness are frequently suboptimal. In 2007, a multidisciplinary task force revised policies outlining staff responsibilities for cleaning in-patient nursing care units and chose a monitoring system using a specialized adenosine triphosphate bioluminescence test.

Discontinuation of contact precautions for patients no longer colonized with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

To reduce the number of patients with known methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonization who are repeatedly placed in isolation on hospital readmission, we screened patients who had no positive results for MRSA culture in the previous 6 months. Twenty-one (21%) of 98 patients were no longer colonized and were removed from contact precautions.

Monitoring the effectiveness of hospital cleaning practices by use of an adenosine triphosphate bioluminescence assay.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the usefulness of an adenosine triphosphate (ATP) bioluminescence assay for assessing the efficacy of daily hospital cleaning practices. DESIGN: A 2-phase prospective intervention study. SETTING: A university-affiliated community teaching hospital. METHODS: During phase I of our study, 5 high-touch surfaces in 20 patient rooms were sampled before and after daily cleaning. Moistened swabs were used to sample these surfaces and were then plated onto routine and selective media, and aerobic colony counts were determined after 48 hours of incubation. Specialized ATP swabs were used to sample the same high-touch surfaces in the 20 patient rooms and were then placed in luminometers, and the amount of ATP present was expressed as relative light units. During phase II of our study, after in-service housekeeper educational sessions were given, the housekeepers were told in advance when ATP readings would be taken before and after cleaning. RESULTS: During phase I, the colony counts revealed that the 5 high-touch surfaces were often not cleaned adequately. After cleaning, 24 (24%) of the 100 surface samples were still contaminated with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, and 16 (16%) of the 100 surface samples still yielded vancomycin-resistant enterococci. ATP readings (expressed as relative light units) revealed that only bathroom grab bars and toilet seats were significantly cleaner after daily cleaning than before. During phase II, a total of 1,013 ATP readings were obtained before and after daily cleaning in 105 rooms. The median relative light unit was significantly lower (ie, surfaces were cleaner) after cleaning than before cleaning for all 5 high-touch surfaces. CONCLUSIONS: Suboptimal cleaning practices were documented by determining aerobic colony counts and by use of an ATP bioluminescence assay. ATP readings provided quantitative evidence of improved cleanliness of high-touch surfaces after the implementation of an intervention program.

Do infection control measures work for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus?

OBJECTIVE: To review evidence regarding the effectiveness of control measures in reducing transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in hospitals. DESIGN: Literature review and surveillance cultures of hospitalized patients at high risk for MRSA colonization or infection. SETTING: A 500-bed, university-affiliated, community teaching hospital. RESULTS: The percentage of nosocomial S. aureus infections caused by MRSA increased significantly between 1982 and 2002, despite the use of various isolation and barrier precaution policies. The apparent ineffectiveness of control measures may be due to several factors including the failure to identify patients colonized with MRSA. For example, cultures of stool specimens submitted for Clostridium difficile toxin assays at one hospital found that 12% of patients had MRSA in their stool, and 41% of patients with unrecognized colonization were cared for without using barrier precautions. Other factors include the use of barrier precaution strategies that do not account for multiple reservoirs of MRSA, poor adherence of healthcare workers (HCWs) to recommended barrier precautions and handwashing, failure to identify and treat HCWs responsible for transmitting MRSA, and importation of MRSA by patients admitted from other facilities. Control programs that include active surveillance cultures (ASCs) of high-risk patients and use of barrier precautions have reduced MRSA prevalence rates and have been cost-effective. Using a staged approach to implementing ASCs can minimize logistic problems. CONCLUSION: MRSA control programs are effective if they include ASCs of high-risk patients, use of barrier precautions when caring for colonized or infected patients, hand hygiene, and treating HCWs implicated in MRSA transmission.

The importance of evaluating product dispensers when selecting alcohol-based handrubs.

BACKGROUND: To promote improved hand hygiene among personnel, a hospital installed dispensers for an alcohol-based hand rinse throughout the facility. Soon after installation, dispensers began to malfunction and continued to do so despite efforts to rectify the problem. METHODS: Sixteen months after installation, dispensers in all patient rooms were examined, and surveyors recorded the condition of dispensers, the number of times the dispenser lever was pressed to obtain product, how the product was delivered onto the hand, and a qualitative estimate of the volume delivered. RESULTS: Of 166 dispensers, 2% were broken, 7% had no product container, 5% had an empty product container, 9% contained product but were totally obstructed, and 77% were functional. Of the 128 functional dispensers, 65% delivered product after a single stroke of the lever, 13% after 2 strokes, 9% after 3 strokes, and 13% after 4 or more strokes. Seventeen percent delivered a small volume onto the hand, and 16% squirted the product onto the wall or floor. CONCLUSION: Evaluation of alcohol-based handrubs should consider not only product characteristics, user acceptability, skin tolerance, and cost but also the design and function of the dispensers that will ultimately be installed.