Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Arthroplasty ; 25(4): 558-62, 2010 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19447003

RESUMO

Many strategies have been reported for decreasing the cost of orthopedic procedures, but prosthetic waste has not been investigated. The purpose of this study was to characterize the cost of intraoperative waste of hip and knee implants. A regional prospective assessment was performed, evaluating the reasons for component waste, the cost of the wasted implants, and where the cost was absorbed (hospital or manufacturer). Implant waste occurred in 79 (2%) of 3443 procedures, with the surgeon and operating room staff bearing primary responsibility in 73% of occurrences. The annualized cost was $109 295.35, with 67% absorbed by hospitals. When extrapolated to the whole of the United States, the annual cost to hospitals would be $36,019,000 and is estimated to rise to $112,033,000 by 2030, representing a potential target for educational programs and other cost containment measures.


Assuntos
Artroplastia de Quadril/economia , Artroplastia do Joelho/economia , Prótese de Quadril/economia , Prótese do Joelho/economia , Humanos , Estados Unidos
2.
J Orthop Trauma ; 23(10): 710-5, 2009.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19858979

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The purposes of this study were to assess the incidence of intraoperative trauma implant waste in a regional territory of the United States and to assess its impact on costs. METHODS: The total number of procedures using a single device manufacturer's orthopaedic trauma implants in one geographic region and number of occurrences of intraoperative orthopaedic trauma implant waste were recorded prospectively from 74 contiguous hospitals over a period of 18 months along with the individual responsible for the waste (surgeon, vendor representative, or operating room staff), the cost of the wasted implant, and whether the hospital paid for the implant. Hospitals were stratified into teaching or community institutions. The collected data were then aggregated and analyzed for overall incidence and cost as well as cost per trauma procedure. RESULTS: Implant waste occurred in 37 of 6531 procedures (0.6%) with 16 of the centers (21.6%) reporting at least one occurrence and 95% attributed to the surgeon or operating room staff. Community hospitals were found to have a significantly higher incidence of implant waste as compared with teaching hospitals. Hospitals absorbed 74% of the wasted implant costs ($20,357 over the study period). This expense represented a mean additional cost of $3.12 per orthopaedic trauma procedure performed. CONCLUSIONS: There is a small but notable annual incidence and cost of orthopaedic trauma implant waste in the study region with the majority of this cost borne by the hospitals. However, implant waste occurs infrequently and represents a very small cost to hospitals per procedure. Educational programs and other strategies to reduce its incidence are unlikely to yield any substantial cost savings.


Assuntos
Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Cuidados Intraoperatórios/economia , Resíduos de Serviços de Saúde/economia , Resíduos de Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Próteses e Implantes/economia , Próteses e Implantes/estatística & dados numéricos , Ferimentos e Lesões/economia , Ferimentos e Lesões/cirurgia , Cuidados Intraoperatórios/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...