Training in minimally invasive surgery in urology: European Association of Urology/International Consultation of Urological Diseases consultation.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the progress being made in training for minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in urology. METHODS: A group of experts in the field provided input to agree on recommendations for MIS training. A literature search was carried out to identify studies on MIS training, both in general and specifically for urological procedures. RESULTS: The literature search showed the rapidly developing options for e-learning, box and virtual training, and suggested that box training is a relatively cheap and effective means of improving laparoscopic skills. Development of non-technical skills is an integral part of surgical skills training and should be included in training curricula. The application of modular training in surgical procedures showed more rapid skills acquisition. Training curricula for MIS in urology are being developed in both the USA and Europe. CONCLUSION: Training in MIS has shifted from 'see-one-do-one-teach-one' to a structured learning, from e-learning to skills laboratory and modular training settings.

Outcomes of ERCP: prospective series from a rural centre.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is an important procedure for the investigation and management of pancreaticobiliary disease. There is a recognized potential for significant morbidity, and a number of studies have identified patient and operator risk factors for the development of complications, including small case volume. We look at the outcomes of ERCP from a single operator at a rural centre and compare these with published figures. METHOD: Findings from 700 consecutive ERCP were collected prospectively between August 1997 and May 2006. Patients were included on an intention to treat basis, and all predetermined morbidity criteria were recorded. RESULTS: Five hundred and forty-four therapeutic and 156 diagnostic ERCP were included in the study. There were a total of 40 complications (5.71%), with three cases of ERCP-specific mortality (0.4%). The success of therapeutic intervention was 94.3%. CONCLUSIONS: The importance of comparing personal audit to published prospective studies has been emphasized. This has provided quality assurance finding, confirming that comparable success rates, morbidity and mortality are possible in a low-volume rural centre with an operator who has been properly trained and has ongoing ties with a tertiary hepatobiliary unit, a dedicated and skilled local team and suitable patient selection.