The versatility of the islanded posterior arm flap for regional reconstruction around the axilla.

INTRODUCTION: Defects in the region of the axilla pose a difficult reconstructive problem. Various methods for restoration have been described. We present our experience with the islanded posterior arm flap for regional reconstruction around the axilla. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2008 and 2013, all patients receiving a posterior arm flap for regional reconstruction around the axilla were entered in a prospectively maintained database. Patient data, surgical details, complications and the need for revisional procedures were recorded. RESULTS: In the study period, 35 posterior arm flaps were used in 24 patients (f:m = 11:13; mean age at surgery: 41,3 ± 18,5 years; 11 bilateral procedures) with defects predominately due to hidradenitis suppurativa (n = 31). The remaining indications included tumor resection (n = 2), burn contracture release or thoracic surgery (n = 1 each). The majority of defects were located at the axilla, but also in the proximal upper arm or the adjacent thoracic wall. Major wound complications such as total or partial flap necrosis were not encountered in our series. Minor complications included partial superficial wound dehiscence (n = 4) and superficial wound infection (n = 1), all of which were managed conservatively. In 4 patients a secondary flap trimming procedure was required. CONCLUSION: In our hands, the posterior arm flap is an excellent choice for axillary reconstruction due to its constant anatomy, robust vascularity, unrivaled freedom of flap insetting, excellent recipient site matching and favorable donor site morbidity. Besides axillary defects, the posterior arm flap may additionally be employed for defects of the adjacent thoracic wall or the proximal two thirds of the upper arm.

Effective wound closure with a new two-component wound closure device (Prineo™) in excisional body-contouring surgery: experience in over 200 procedures.

BACKGROUND: In excisional body-contouring surgery the surgeon is often confronted with time-consuming closure of long wounds. Recently, a new combination of a self-adhering mesh together with a liquid 2-octyl cyanoacrylate adhesive (Prineo™; Ethicon, Inc., Somerville, NJ, USA) has been introduced to replace intracutaneous running suture. METHODS: An observational study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of the new wound closure device in excisional body-contouring procedures between January 2008 and November 2010. Wound characteristics were recorded in a prospectively maintained database. RESULTS: During the study period, 224 procedures in 180 patients were undertaken. Twenty-seven patients had two subsequent operations and four patients had three subsequent operations. Application of the new device was easy and safe and patient satisfaction with the results was generally high. However, intense local allergic reactions were seen in 4 patients (1.8%), which necessitated early removal and topical corticosteroid treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Prineo™ enables the surgeon to perform a quick and smooth skin closure, especially in long incisions frequently encountered in excisional body-contouring surgery. The application is fast and easy if basic guidelines are respected. Operating time is saved by eliminating the need for time-consuming intracutaneous running sutures. Removal is easy and painless for the patient. However, there is a potential for local allergic adverse effects of which the surgeon must be aware.