Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Prosthet Dent ; 79(5): 503-7, 1998 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9597601

RESUMO

STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM: Dual-cured cements have been used with castable ceramic restorations, but the tensile bond strengths of these materials have not been thoroughly researched. PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: This study compared the tensile bond strengths between Dicor castable ceramics and enamel of four dual-cure cements: Twinlook, Optec Dual-Cure Luting Cement, Clearfil CR Inlay, and Dual Cement. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Truncated cones made of Dicor castable ceramics were cemented to enamel of freshly extracted anterior teeth with these four cements. Before testing, all specimens were immersed in water at 37 degrees C for 24 hours, and thermocycled 1000 times in 5 degrees C and 55 degrees C water, with a dwell time of 30 seconds each. Tensile force was used to separate each specimen with the Instron universal testing machine. RESULTS: Clearfil CR Inlay cement exhibited the highest mean tensile bond strength (18.4 MPa), followed by Dual (18.3 MPa), Twinlook (15.2 MPa), and Optec Dual-Cure luting (14.9 MPa) cements. One-way analysis of variance did not reveal any significant differences (p = 0.05) among groups. A majority of the fracture was adhesive at the ceramic and cement interface. CONCLUSION: All four dual-cured cements formed strong bonds between enamel and Dicor cement, ranging from 14.90 MPa to 18.35 MPa, and there was no statistically significant difference.


Assuntos
Colagem Dentária , Cimentos Dentários/química , Esmalte Dentário , Porcelana Dentária/química , Análise de Variância , Bis-Fenol A-Glicidil Metacrilato , Teste de Materiais , Cimentos de Resina , Resistência à Tração
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...