Real-time digital polymerase chain reaction (PCR) as a novel technology improves limit of detection for rare allele assays.

BACKGROUND: Tumor heterogeneity may lead to false negative test results for tissue biopsy-based companion diagnostic tests. Real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and digital PCR assays are used to detect rare alleles in cell-free circulating DNA for liquid biopsies; however, those tests lack strong sensitivity at low allele frequencies. We show here a novel real-time digital PCR instrument that utilizes cycle-based amplification curves to further improve the sensitivity and quantification accuracy of digital PCR. METHODS: The novel real-time digital PCR instrument was compared to an endpoint digital PCR system to determine the sensitivity and quantification accuracy of both instruments. Samples were all thermal cycled on the real-time digital PCR instrument but were analyzed on both endpoint and real-time digital PCR instruments to compare the performance without introducing other variables. Contrived samples for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 19 deletion, T790M, and L858R point mutations as well as human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) amplification were tested. Different mutant allele frequencies and wildtype to mutant gene copy number ratios were tested for EGFR and HER2, respectively. RESULTS: By removing false positive datapoints using real-time amplification curves, real-time digital PCR improved sensitivity by lowering the baseline for wildtype samples. For EGFR 19del assay, samples with 2 or more fluorescein amidite (FAM) labeled positive wells are determined positive by real-time digital PCR, while a minimum of 5 FAM positive datapoints is needed by endpoint digital PCR. Improved limit of detection for EGFR 19del mutation was also observed. Real-time digital PCR also had better quantification accuracy and sensitivity, resulting in the mutant allele frequencies being closer to the expected values for all EGFR mutations, especially at very low allele frequencies. However, at high allele frequencies or for gene amplification assays, real-time digital PCR is comparable with endpoint digital PCR. CONCLUSIONS: This novel technology with improved sensitivity is important and needed because it addresses current issues with liquid biopsy tests. Due to limited amounts of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) obtained for liquid biopsy tests, few copies of mutant alleles are expected. With the lower baseline of real-time digital PCR, false negative test results from tissue biopsy would be more effectively reduced, leading to more patients receiving the targeted therapy they need for better survival.

Increased sensitivity using real-time dPCR for detection of SARS-CoV-2.

A real-time dPCR system was developed to improve the sensitivity, specificity and quantification accuracy of end point dPCR. We compared three technologies - real-time qPCR, end point dPCR and real-time dPCR - in the context of SARS-CoV-2. Some improvement in limit of detection was obtained with end point dPCR compared with real-time qPCR, and the limit of detection was further improved with the newly developed real-time dPCR technology through removal of false-positive signals. Real-time dPCR showed increased linear dynamic range compared with end point dPCR based on quantitation from amplification curves. Real-time dPCR can improve the performance of TaqMan assays beyond real-time qPCR and end point dPCR with better sensitivity and specificity, absolute quantification and a wider linear range of detection.