Transport of Critically Ill Patients by the Anesthesia Versus the Intensive Care Unit Service: A Before-After Study of Operating Room Workflows.

BACKGROUND: We implemented a new policy at our institution where the responsibility for intensive care unit (ICU) patient transports to the operating room (OR) was changed from the anesthesia to the ICU service. We hypothesized that this approach would be associated with increased on-time starts and decreased turnover times. METHODS: In the historical model, intubated patients or those on mechanical circulatory assistance (MCA) were transported by the anesthesia service to the OR ("pre-ICU Pickup"). In our new model, these patients are transported by the ICU service to the preoperative holding area (Pre-op) where care is transferred to the anesthesia service ("post-ICU Transfer"). If judged necessary by the ICU or anesthesia attending, the patient was transported by the anesthesia service ("post-ICU Pickup"). We retrospectively reviewed case tracking data for patients undergoing surgery before (January 2014 to May 2015) and after implementation (July 2016 to June 2017) of the new policy. The primary outcome was the proportion of elective, weekday first-case, on-time starts. To adjust for confounders including comorbidities and time trends, we performed a segmented logistic regression analysis assessing the effect of our intervention on the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were turnover times and compliance with preoperative checklist documentation. RESULTS: We identified 95 first-start and 86 turnover cases in the pre-ICU Pickup, 70 first-start and 88 turnover cases in the post-ICU Transfer, and 6 turnover cases in the post-ICU Pickup group. Ignoring time trends, the crude proportion of on-time starts increased from 32.6% in the pre-ICU Pickup to 77.1% in the post-ICU Transfer group. After segmented logistic regression adjusting for age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, respiratory failure, endotracheal intubation, MCA, congestive heart failure (CHF), valvular heart disease, and cardiogenic and hemorrhagic shock, the post-ICU Transfer group was more likely to have an on-time start at the start of the intervention than the pre-ICU Pickup group at the end of the preintervention period (odds ratio, 11.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-125.7; P = .043). After segmented linear regression adjusting for the above confounders, the estimated difference in mean turnover times between the post-ICU Pickup and pre-ICU Transfer group was not significant (-6.9 minutes; 95% CI, -17.09 to 3.27; P = .17). In post-ICU Transfer patients, consent, history and physical examination (H&P), and site marking were verified before leaving the ICU in 92.9%, 93.2%, and 89.2% of the cases, respectively. No adverse events were reported during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: A transition from the anesthesia to the ICU service for transporting ICU patients to the OR did not change turnover times but resulted in more on-time starts and high compliance with preoperative checklist documentation.

Is there a long-term predictive value of intraoperative low-dose dobutamine echocardiography in patients who have coronary artery bypass graft surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass?

UNLABELLED: In patients with coronary artery disease, chronic regional left ventricular systolic dysfunction at rest may be caused by hibernating or by infarcted myocardium. Intraoperative low-dose dobutamine (LDD) echocardiography reliably predicts the immediate recovery of regional myocardial function after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. We sought to determine whether intraoperative LDD echocardiography would also predict recovery of regional function after 1 yr. Twenty-five patients with coronary artery disease who underwent CABG surgery with intraoperative LDD echocardiography were evaluated 1 yr later with a follow-up transthoracic echocardiogram. The covariates of left ventricular ejection fraction, old myocardial infarction, and diabetes mellitus were considered in an analysis of regional wall motion (RWM). A 16-segment model and a 1-5-point scoring system were used to evaluate 350 myocardial segments. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to determine whether response to intraoperative LDD echocardiography (5 microg. kg(-1). min(-1)) predicted changes in regional function at 1 yr. A segment was defined as stunned if the RWM score obtained during LDD infusion deteriorated after cardiopulmonary bypass but recovered in the 1-yr follow-up echocardiogram. A response to intraoperative LDD predicted changes in regional function at 1 yr. The overall odds of improvement in regional function were 2.22 times greater (95% confidence interval = 1.29, 3.82; P = 0.0039) with a positive response to intraoperative LDD. The positive predictive value of intraoperative LDD echocardiography for improvement in myocardial function was 0.81 and the negative predictive value was 0.34. The predictive values did not vary with the examined covariates. Of segments with unexpected deterioration of RWM immediately after cardiopulmonary bypass, 87% recovered at the time of the 1-yr follow-up echocardiogram. Contractile reserve demonstrated by intraoperative LDD echocardiography predicts regional function at 1 yr; however, the test cannot predict which segment will not recover. Most of unexpected regional ventricular systolic dysfunction immediately after CABG surgery can be attributed to myocardial stunning. IMPLICATIONS: In patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery, intraoperative low-dose dobutamine echocardiography has only limited value for the prediction of regional myocardial function at 1 yr. Small-dose dobutamine echocardiography predicts regional myocardial function at 1 yr when baseline regional wall motion abnormalities improve with dobutamine; however, the test cannot be used to predict which segment will not recover at 1 yr.

The effect of cardiopulmonary bypass and inspired oxygen concentration on left ventricular contrast opacification with optison, a second-generation ultrasound contrast agent.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the influence of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and fraction of inspired oxygen (F(I)O(2)) on the contrast effect of Optison, a second-generation ultrasound contrast agent, in humans during coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery with transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). DESIGN: Prospective, observational, repeated-measures design. SETTING: A single university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Ten patients who underwent elective CABG surgery. INTERVENTIONS: A transgastric, midpapillary, short-axis view of the left ventricle was obtained with TEE in the conventional imaging mode. A central injection of 0.3 mL of Optison was administered at 4 stages: after induction of anesthesia at F(I)O(2) = 1.0 and F(I)O(2) = 0.43 +/- 0.02 and after protamine administration at F(I)O(2) = 1.0 and F(I)O(2) = 0.52 +/- 0.09. Background-corrected maximal pixel intensity (PImax(corr)) in the left ventricle was determined with videodensitometry. To estimate the magnitude of change in pixel intensities, point estimates of differences in PImax(corr) and their 95% and 99% confidence intervals were calculated after repeated measures analysis of variance. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Decreasing the F(I)O(2) from 1.0 to <1 did not alter PImax(corr) significantly before or after CPB (mean change = -4.2 and 0.8; SE = 2.0 and 1.9; p = 0.06 and 0.68). Values for PImax(corr) before and after CPB were not significantly different at either F(I)O(2) = 1.0 or F(I)O(2) <1 (mean change = -3.3 and 1.7; SE = 2.4 and 2.7; p = 0.26 and 0.54). Mean differences from initial values ranged from a 10% decrease to a 5% increase. CONCLUSION: In patients who undergo CABG surgery, the contrast opacification of Optison in the left ventricle is not changed by CPB or alterations in F(I)O(2) during intraoperative TEE. The application of Optison for enhancement of the endocardial border is not limited during cardiac surgery.