Treatment of active rheumatoid arthritis: comparison of patients younger vs older than 75 years (CORPUS cohort).

Objectives: Little information is available on the characteristics of elderly patients starting TNFα antagonist treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The objective of this work was to compare prescription patterns in RA patients younger vs. older than 75 years. Methods: Biologic-naive patients with active RA (DAS28 > 3.2) despite first-line therapy were included between 2007 and 2009 in the prospective, multicentre, longitudinal, observational, population-based CORPUS-RA cohort. TNFα antagonist users were defined as having received at least one TNFα antagonist during the first study year. The groups < 75 years and ≥ 75 years were compared regarding comorbidities, inflammation (CRP and ESR), disease activity (DAS28), disability (HAQ-DI), number of physician visits, and treatment. To verify the impact of the cut off, we also compared patients aged 70 years or more to patients younger than 70 years. Results: Of 543 RA patients, 382 had complete one-year follow-up data, including 114 TNFα antagonist users, 3 (6%) among the 49 patients aged 75 years or over and 111 (32%) of the 333 patients younger than 75 years (p < 0.01). Disease activity in the two age groups was similar at inclusion and after one year. Comorbidities and a history of auto-immunity were more common in the older group. Compared to their younger counterparts, the older patients received glucocorticoids more often (p = 0.003) and synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs less often (p = 0.01). Conclusion: TNFα antagonists are used less often and glucocorticoids more often in elderly patients with active RA compared to their younger counterparts. The fact that this study was performed in 2007-9 is a limitation in terms of relevance to today's patients and further studies should be conducted in new cohorts of active RA.

Glucocorticoid-sparing effect of first-year anti-TNFα treatment in rheumatoid arthritis (CORPUS Cohort).

OBJECTIVES: Anti-TNFα agents are indicated in selected patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who respond inadequately to methotrexate and particularly when glucocorticoids are mandatory. We evaluated whether a glucocorticoid-sparing effect occurred during the first year of anti-TNF-α therapy. METHODS: Between 2007 and 2009, the French multicentre, longitudinal, prospective, observational, population-based CORPUS cohort included biologic-naive patients with inflammatory joint disease. Patients with active RA treated with glucocorticoids were included. Patients who received at least one anti-TNFα injection during follow-up were compared to anti-TNF-α non-users. RESULTS: Among the 205 patients, 76.1% were women, mean disease duration was 7.7±8.3 years, mean DAS28 was 5.2±1.3, mean follow-up was 13.1±2.8 months, and mean prednisone dose was 9.9±9.6 mg/day. The 75 (36.6%) anti-TNF-α recipients were younger, had a longer RA duration, more often tested positive for rheumatoid factor and anti-citrullinated peptide antibody, more often received previous DMARDs, received a higher methotrexate dosage, had fewer intra-articular glucocorticoid injections at baseline and were more often followed by hospital practitioners than non-recipients. Mean prednisone dosage decreased from 11.8±12.7 to 5.9±9.7 mg/day in recipients and from 8.7±7.1 to 5.0±4.4 mg/day in non-recipients. Prednisone was stopped more often among recipients (21/59, 35.6%) than among non-recipients (16/94, 17.0%) (p=0.01). By multivariate analysis, factors independently associated with lower prednisone requirements were baseline daily prednisone dosage, a CRP >10 mg/l and not to be followed by an office-based practitioner. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed a significantly higher glucocorticoid discontinuation rate among anti-TNF-α recipients than among non-recipients. However, the glucocorticoid-sparing effect was small and not observed by multivariate analysis.

Lymphopenia in early arthritis: Impact on diagnosis and 3-year outcomes (ESPOIR cohort).

OBJECTIVES: In patients with early arthritis naive to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, we evaluated the prevalence of initial and persistent lymphopenia, underlying diagnoses, and risk of infection or malignancy. METHODS: Eight hundred and thirteen patients with early arthritis included in the ESPOIR cohort had a clinical examination, laboratory tests (viral serology, immunological tests, and cytokine profile), and radiographs. We determined the prevalence of lymphopenia at baseline and after 3 years, associated factors, diagnoses, and risk of infection or malignancy. RESULTS: At baseline, 50/813 (6.2%) patients had lymphopenia. Lymphopenia was associated with positive rheumatoid factor (P=0.02), cytopenia (P≤0.05), hepatitis C (P=0.05), higher C-reactive protein and DAS28 (P≤0.05 for both). Cytokine profile and radiological progression were not significantly different between patients with and without lymphopenia. Suspected diagnoses at inclusion were rheumatoid arthritis (RA, n=27), unclassified arthritis (n=15), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE, n=3), spondyloarthritis (n=2), Sjögren's syndrome (n=1), hematologic disease (n=1), and fibromyalgia (n=1). Fifteen patients out of 42 (35.7%) with initial lymphopenia had persistent lymphopenia after 3 years, including 5 with documented causes (lupus, hepatitis C, undernutrition, azathioprine, and tamoxifen); none had PVB19, HIV, or HBV infection and none experienced infections, solid or hematologic malignancies during follow-up. Final diagnoses in these 15 patients were RA (n=6), unclassified arthritis (n=6), SLE (n=1), spondyloarthritis (n=1), and fibromyalgia (n=1). CONCLUSIONS: Lymphopenia is rare in early arthritis. The most common rheumatic cause is RA, in which marked inflammation and other cytopenias are common. Lymphopenia in early arthritis is often short-lived, even when methotrexate is prescribed.