Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in clinical practice: Principles, applications, and basic interpretation.

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) provides a noninvasive and integrated assessment of the response of the respiratory, cardiovascular, and musculoskeletal systems to exercise. This information improves the diagnosis, risk stratification, and therapeutic management of several clinical conditions. Additionally, CPET is the gold standard test for cardiorespiratory fitness quantification and exercise prescription, both in patients with cardiopulmonary disease undergoing cardiac or pulmonary rehabilitation programs and in healthy individuals, such as high-level athletes. In this setting, the relevance of practical knowledge about this exam is useful and of interest to several medical specialties other than cardiology. However, despite its multiple established advantages, CPET remains underused. This article aims to increase awareness of the value of CPET in clinical practice and to inform clinicians about its main indications, applications, and basic interpretation.

Exercise Oscillatory Ventilation Improves Heart Failure Prognostic Scores.

BACKGROUND: Several heart failure (HF) prognostic risk scores are available to guide the ideal time for listing candidates for a heart transplant (HTx). The detection of exercise oscillatory ventilation (EOV) during cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is associated with advanced HF and a worse prognosis, and yet it is not accounted for in these risk scores. Therefore, this study aimed to assess whether EOV further adds prognostic value to HF scores. METHODS: A single-centre retrospective cohort study was undertaken of consecutive HF patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) who underwent CPET from 1996 to 2018. The Heart Failure Survival Score (HFSS), Seattle Heart Failure Model (SHFM), Meta-analysis Global Group In Chronic Heart Failure (MAGGIC), and Metabolic Exercise Cardiac Kidney Index (MECKI) were calculated. The added value of EOV on top of those scores was assessed using a Cox proportional hazard model. The added discriminative power was also assessed by receiver operating characteristic curve comparison. RESULTS: A total of 390 HF patients with a median age of 58 (IQR 50-65) years were investigated, of whom 78% were male and 54% had ischaemic heart disease. The median peak oxygen consumption was 15.7 mL/kg/min (IQR 12.8-20.1). Exercise oscillatory ventilation was detected in 153 (39.2%) patients. Over a median follow-up of 2 years, 61 patients died (49 due to a cardiovascular reason) and 54 had a HTx. Exercise oscillatory ventilation independently predicted the composite outcome of all-cause death and HTx. Furthermore, the presence of this ventilatory pattern significantly improved the prognostic performance of both HFSS and MAGGIC scores. CONCLUSION: Exercise oscillatory ventilation was often found in a cohort of HF patients with reduced LVEF who underwent CPET. It was found that EOV added further prognostic value to contemporary HF scores, suggesting that this easily obtained parameter should be included in future modified HF scores.

Beyond exercise oscillatory ventilations: the prognostic impact of loop gain in heart failure.

Exercise oscillatory ventilation (EOV) is a strong prognostic marker in patients with heart failure (HF) and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. This phenomenon can be explained through a single quantitative measurement of ventilatory instability, the loop gain. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate whether loop gain could be a better tool than subjective EOV evaluation to identify HF patients with a higher risk of major cardiovascular complications. This was a single-center retrospective study that included patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 50% consecutively referred for cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) from 2016-2020. Loop gain was measured through computational evaluation of the minute ventilation graph. Of the 250 patients included, the 66 that presented EOV also had higher values of loop gain, when compared to patients without EOV. Those with both EOV and higher loop gain had more severe HF, with higher NT-proBNP and VE/VCO2 slope as well as lower peak VO2 and LVEF. On multivariable analysis, loop gain was strongly correlated with the composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, urgent heart transplantation, urgent left ventricular assist device implantation or HF hospitalization, even after correcting for peak VO2, LVEF, VE/VCO2 slope and NT-proBNP. Presence of EOV was not prognostically significant in this analysis. Loop gain is an objective parameter that quantifies ventilatory instability and showed to have a strong prognostic value in a cohort of patients with HF and LVEF ≤ 50%, outperforming the classification of EOV.

Loop gain is an objective parameter that quantifies ventilatory instability and demonstrated strong prognostic value in patients with heart failure (HF) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 50%. Loop gain was strongly correlated with the composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, urgent heart transplantation, urgent left ventricular assist device implantation or HF hospitalization, even after correcting for peak VO2, LVEF, VE/VCO2 slope and NT-proBNP. Presence of exercise oscillatory ventilation was not prognostically significant when added to loop gain measurement.

Clinical outcomes in heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction and good functional capacity: The illusion of stability.

BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) remains a prevalent syndrome with significant morbidity and mortality. Optimal drug and device therapies are crucial to reduce the risk of death or HF admission. Yet, less symptomatic patients with good functional capacity are often perceived as having a low risk of adverse events and their attending physicians may suffer from prescription inertia or refrain from performing therapy optimization. Maximum or peak oxygen consumption (pVO2) assessed during cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is often used as a prognosis indicator and surrogate marker for functional capacity. Our goal was to assess clinical outcomes in a seemingly low risk HF population in Weber class A (pVO2>20 mL/kg/min) with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). METHODS: Single-center retrospective observational study enrolling consecutive HF patients with LVEF<40% (HFrEF) performing CPET between 2003 and 2018. Those with pVO2 >20 mL/kg/min were included. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death or HF hospitalizations at two years after CPET. We also assessed the rates of N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) elevations at baseline. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients were included (mean age of 53±10 years; 86% male; 90% NYHA I-II; median LVEF 32%; median pVO2 24 mL/kg/min). At baseline, 93% had an NT-proBNP level >125 pg/mL (median NT-proBNP 388 [201-684] pg/mL). Overall, seven patients (10%) met the primary endpoint: three died (4%) and five (7%) had at least one HF admission. Among those who died, only one patient had an HF admission during follow up. CONCLUSION: In a clinically stable HFrEF population with good functional capacity, persistent neurohormonal activation was present in the majority, and one in ten patients died or had a HF admission at two years' follow-up. These findings support the urgent need to motivate clinicians to pursue optimal drug uptitration even in less symptomatic patients.

Consensus document on chronic coronary syndrome assessment and risk stratification in Portugal: A position paper statement from the [Portuguese Society of Cardiology's] Working Groups on Nuclear Cardiology, Magnetic Resonance and Cardiac Computed Tomography, Echocardiography, and Exercise Physiology and Cardiac Rehabilitation. / Documento de Consenso sobre Estratificação de Risco Cardiovascular e estudo da doença coronária em Portugal: a posição dos Grupos de Estudo de Cardiologia Nuclear, Ressonância Magnética e Tomografia Computorizada Cardíaca, de Ecocardiografia e de Fisiopatologia do Esforço e Reabilitação Cardíaca.

Despite constant medical evolution, the reimbursement policy of Portuguese National Health Service (NHS) for the study and risk stratification of coronary heart disease has remained unchanged for several decades. Lack of adjustment to contemporary clinical practice has long been evident. However, the recent publication of the European Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of chronic coronary syndromes further highlighted this gap and the urgent need for a change. Prompted by these Guidelines, the Working Group on Nuclear Cardiology, Cardiac Magnetic Resonance and Cardiac CT, the Working Group on Echocardiography and the Working Group on Stress Pathophysiology and Cardiac Rehabilitation of the Portuguese Society of Cardiology, began a process of joint reflection on the current limitations and how these recommendations could be applied in Portugal. To this end, the authors suggest that the new imaging methods (stress echocardiogram, cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance), should be added to exercise treadmill stress test and myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in the available exam portfolio within the Portuguese NHS. This change would allow full adoption of European guidelines and a better use of tests, according to clinical context, availability and local specificities. The adoption of clinical guidance standards, based on these assumptions, would translate into a qualitative improvement in the management of these patients and would promote an effective use of the available resources, with potential health and financial gains.

Current state of cardiac rehabilitation in Portugal: Results of the 2019 national survey.

INTRODUCTION: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programs have a central role in cardiovascular medicine, encompassing a comprehensive framework able to holistically address various facets of cardiovascular disease. However, several obstacles to their optimal application have been reported. Over the years, the Portuguese Society of Cardiology has periodically conducted a national survey on the state of CR in Portugal. OBJECTIVES: This study reports the results of the 2019 survey on CR. METHODS: In December 2019 a voluntary questionnaire was sent to centers offering CR programs, consisting of several items concerning this intervention. RESULTS: In 2019, 25 centers provided structured CR programs. A total of 2182 patients underwent phase II programs, representing an increase of 13% from the previous survey. Of these, 67.2% were referred due to ischemic heart disease, and 14.5% due to heart failure. Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) comprised 49.3% of referrals, leading to an estimated 9.3% CR coverage. A total of 606 patients participated in phase III programs (a decrease of 37%). Drop-out rates ranged from 0-68%; 91% of centers presented drop-out rates <25%. CONCLUSION: The present survey shows an increase in the number of centers and patients undergoing phase II CR, and an increase in the estimated CR coverage after ACS. Despite this, the level of increase means that overall patient representation remained below the optimal range, while the data also showed a decrease in the number of patients in phase III programs. These findings reinforce the importance of optimization of CR entry and maintenance, in order to improve the uptake of this pivotal intervention.

Medication adherence to direct anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation - A real world analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) changed the landscape of atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment, but also brought with them new challenges in terms of accessibility and compliance. The purpose of this study was to assess adherence to DOACs, and its determinants in a population of AF patients. METHODS: Single-center retrospective study including all patients with non-valvular AF treated with a DOAC from the outpatient general cardiology list at a tertiary center, whose first DOAC prescription was between 1 April 2016 and August 2018. The number of pharmacy refills from the day of first prescription to 31 August 2018 was counted (by means of an electronic prescription platform). Medication refill adherence (MRA) was calculated by dividing the total days' supply by the number of days under therapy. Non-compliance was defined as MRA <90%. RESULTS: A total of 264 patients (120 men, mean age 74 ±â€¯12 years) met the inclusion criteria. The median CHA2DS2VASC score was 3 (interquartile range (IQR) 2-5) and the median HAS-BLED was 1 (IQR 1-2). Rivaroxaban, apixaban, dabigatran and edoxaban were prescribed in 45%, 41%, 24% and 13% of patients, respectively. During the study 51 patients (19%) used at least two DOACs .Patients took DOACs for a median period of 439 days (IQR 269-638), during which the included population adhered to therapy 90% of the time (IQR 75-100%). Half of the patients (51%) were classified as non-compliant; therapy duration (adjusted odds ratio 1.06 per month, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.08, p<0.001), DOACs twice daily (adjusted OR 1.73, 95%CI 1.08-2.75, p=0.022), and higher out-of-pocket costs (adjusted OR 2.13, 95%CI 1.28-3.45, p=0.003) were independent predictors of non-compliance. CONCLUSION: Half of the patients (51%) were classified as non-compliant (medication refill adherence <90%). Therapy duration, DOACs twice daily and higher out out-of-pocket costs were independent predictors of non-compliance, which could be targets to improve patient adherence.

Safety and Long-Term Outcomes of Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Using Magnetic Navigation versus Manual Conventional Ablation: A Propensity-Score Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Whether or not the potential advantages of using a magnetic navigation system (MNS) translate into improved outcomes in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is a question that remains unanswered. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this observational registry study, we used propensity-score matching to compare the outcomes of patients with symptomatic drug-refractory AF who underwent catheter ablation using MNS with the outcomes of those who underwent catheter ablation using conventional manual navigation. Among 1,035 eligible patients, 287 patients in each group had similar propensity scores and were included in the analysis. The primary efficacy outcome was the rate of AF relapse after a 3-month blanking period. At a mean follow-up of 2.6 ± 1.5 years, AF ablation with MNS was associated with a similar risk of AF relapse as compared with manual navigation (18.4% per year and 22.3% per year, respectively; hazard ratio 0.81, 95% CI 0.63-1.05; P = 0.108). Major complications occurred in two patients (0.7%) using MNS, and in six patients (2.1%) undergoing manually navigated ablation (P = 0.286). Fluoroscopy times were 21 ± 10 minutes in the manual navigation group, and 12 ± 9 minutes in the MNS group (P < 0.001), whereas total procedure times were 152 ± 52 minutes and 213 ± 58 minutes, respectively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this propensity-score matched comparison, magnetic navigation and conventional manual AF ablations seem to have similar relapse rates and a similar risk of complications. AF ablations with magnetic navigation take longer to perform but expose patients to significantly shorter fluoroscopy times.

Left atrial volume is more important than the type of atrial fibrillation in predicting the long-term success of catheter ablation.

BACKGROUND: The type of atrial fibrillation (AF) is the sole prognostic factor that affects the level of recommendation for catheter ablation in the current guidelines. Despite being recognized as a predictor of recurrence, relatively little emphasis is given to left atrium (LA) size. The aim of this study was to assess the relative importance of LA volume and type of AF as predictors of outcome after PVI. METHODS: We assessed 809 consecutive patients with symptomatic drug-refractory AF (584 male, mean age 57 ± 11 years) undergoing 905 percutaneous PVI procedures in two centers. LA volume was assessed by cardiac CT and/or electroanatomical mapping prior to AF ablation. The study endpoint was symptomatic and/or documented AF recurrence. RESULTS: The majority of patients (73.2%, n=592) had paroxysmal AF. The mean indexed LA volume was 55 ± 20 ml/m(2). During a follow-up of 2.4 ± 1.7 years, there were 280 recurrences. The relapse rate of patients with paroxysmal AF in the highest tertile of LA volume was higher than the relapse rate of patients with non-paroxysmal AF in the lowest tertile (20.0% vs. 10.9% per person-year, respectively, p=0.041). LA volume (HR 1.16 for each 10 ml/m(2), 95% CI 1.09-1.23, p<0.001), female gender (HR 1.55, 95% CI 1.19-2.03, p=0.001), and non-paroxysmal AF (HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.01-1.69, p=0.039) were the only independent predictors of AF recurrence. Split-sample cross-validation resampling confirmed LA volume as the strongest predictor of relapse after PVI. CONCLUSION: Left atrial volume seems to be more important than the type of atrial fibrillation in predicting the long-term success of pulmonary vein isolation.

Preferential use of nonreversed vein grafts in above-knee femoropopliteal bypasses for critical ischemia: midterm outcome.

We evaluated nonreversed vein grafts in above-knee bypasses for chronic critical limb ischemia in a retrospective study with intention-to-treat analysis in patients who underwent above-knee bypass grafting. During a 4-year period, 51 patients (men, 32; women, 19; mean age = 66 years) with 53 critically ischemic lower extremities underwent above-knee femoropopliteal bypass grafting. The follow-up evaluation consisted of clinical examination, assessment of the ankle-brachial systolic blood pressure index, and, whenever necessary, duplex scanning. Three (5.7%) deaths occurred within 30 days, two from myocardial infarction and one from an undetermined cause. The 2-year cumulative success rate was 82.5 +/- 9.6% for primary patency, 84.6 +/- 8.9% for secondary patency, 90.1 +/- 7.3% for tertiary patency, 86.9 +/- 7.6% for limb salvage, 77.7 +/- 8.4% for survival, 68.0 +/- 11.1% for composite patency, and 68.4 +/- 9.3% for amputation-free survival; the corresponding estimates for vein grafts alone were 86.6 +/- 9.2%, 88.9 +/- 8.6%, 89.0 +/- 8.5%, 88.1 +/- 8.1%, 81.1 +/- 9.1, 76.8 +/- 11.1%, and 72.6 +/- 10.2%. Three prosthetic grafts failed and were replaced with an arm vein graft. Nonreversed vein bypass grafts in above-knee revascularization of critically ischemic limbs are justified.

Meta-analysis of infrapopliteal angioplasty for chronic critical limb ischemia.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty has been used with increasing frequency in the treatment of infrainguinal arterial occlusive disease. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the middle-term outcomes after crural angioplasty in patients with chronic critical limb ischemia and compare results with a meta-analysis of popliteal-to-distal vein bypass graft. METHODS: Data were retrieved from 30 articles published from 1990 through 2006 (63% of articles published between 2000 and 2006). All studies used survival analysis, reported a 12-month cumulative rate of patency or limb salvage, and included at least 15 infrapopliteal angioplasties. The outcome measures were immediate technical success, primary and secondary patency, limb salvage, and patient survival. Data from life-tables, survival curves, and texts were used. RESULTS: The pooled estimate of success was 89.0% +/- 2.2% for immediate technical result. Results at 1 and 36 months were 77.4% +/- 4.1% and 48.6% +/- 8.0% for primary patency, 83.3% +/- 1.4% and 62.9% +/- 11.0% for secondary patency, 93.4% +/- 2.3% and 82.4% +/- 3.4% for limb salvage, and 98.3% +/- 0.7% and 68.4% +/- 5.5% for patient survival, respectively. Studies with >75% of the limbs with tissue loss fared worse than their respective comparative subgroup for technical success and patency but not for limb salvage or survival. No publication bias was detected. CONCLUSION: The technical success and subsequent durability of crural angioplasty are limited compared with bypass surgery, but the clinical benefit is acceptable because limb salvage rates are equivalent to bypass surgery. Further studies are necessary to determine the proper role of infrapopliteal angioplasty.

Should major vascular surgery be delayed because of preoperative cardiac testing in intermediate-risk patients receiving beta-blocker therapy with tight heart rate control?

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the value of preoperative cardiac testing in intermediate-risk patients receiving beta-blocker therapy with tight heart rate (HR) control scheduled for major vascular surgery. BACKGROUND: Treatment guidelines of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association recommend cardiac testing in these patients to identify subjects at increased risk. This policy delays surgery, even though test results might be redundant and beta-blockers with tight HR control provide sufficient myocardial protection. Furthermore, the benefit of revascularization in high-risk patients is ill-defined. METHODS: All 1,476 screened patients were stratified into low-risk (0 risk factors), intermediate-risk (1 to 2 risk factors), and high-risk (> or =3 risk factors). All patients received beta-blockers. The 770 intermediate-risk patients were randomly assigned to cardiac stress-testing (n = 386) or no testing. Test results influenced management. In patients with ischemia, physicians aimed to control HR below the ischemic threshold. Those with extensive stress-induced ischemia were considered for revascularization. The primary end point was cardiac death or myocardial infarction at 30-days after surgery. RESULTS: Testing showed no ischemia in 287 patients (74%); limited ischemia in 65 patients (17%), and extensive ischemia in 34 patients (8.8%). Of 34 patients with extensive ischemia, revascularization before surgery was feasible in 12 patients (35%). Patients assigned to no testing had similar incidence of the primary end point as those assigned to testing (1.8% vs. 2.3%; odds ratio [OR] 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.28 to 2.1; p = 0.62). The strategy of no testing brought surgery almost 3 weeks forward. Regardless of allocated strategy, patients with a HR <65 beats/min had lower risk than the remaining patients (1.3% vs. 5.2%; OR 0.24; 95% CI 0.09 to 0.66; p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac testing can safely be omitted in intermediate-risk patients, provided that beta-blockers aiming at tight HR control are prescribed.

Doença arterial obstrutiva periférica: que atenção temos dispensado à abordagem clínica dos pacientes? / Peripheral obstructive arterial disease: what kind of clinical treatment are we recommending to our patients?

OBJETIVO: Avaliar como pacientes com doença arterial obstrutiva periférica têm sido tratados, em nosso meio, com relação aos fatores de risco e comorbidades. MÉTODO: Questionário sobre pesquisa e tratamento da dislipidemia, diabetes, exercício, uso de anti-plaquetários, tabagismo e hipertensão arterial no paciente com doença arterial obstrutiva periférica foi aplicado entre os médicos presentes na reunião mensal de março de 2004 da Sociedade Brasileira de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular - Regional São Paulo. RESULTADOS: Dos 102 questionários distribuídos, 75 foram respondidos (taxa de resposta de 73,5 por cento). Entre os consultados, 82 por cento pesquisam rotineiramente perfil lipídico e 20 por cento visam alvo de LDL-colesterol abaixo de 100 mg/dl; 94 por cento realizam pesquisa para diabetes melito; 97 por cento recomendam exercício; 79 por cento prescrevem aspirina; 97 por cento aconselham que os pacientes parem de fumar e 60 por cento se restringem ao aconselhamento isoladamente; 18 por cento não realizam a medida da pressão arterial durante a consulta e 19 por cento visam alvo pressórico de 130 x 80 mmHg. Considerando todas as avaliações em conjunto - intervenção no estilo de vida, no sentido de parar de fumar, orientação de exercícios, uso de anti-plaquetários, realização de pesquisa para diabetes melito, controle rigoroso da pressão arterial e lípides - observou-se que 7 por cento dos entrevistados seguem todas essas recomendações como uma rotina estabelecida. CONCLUSÃO: O presente estudo demonstrou que, em nosso meio, a pesquisa e o tratamento dos fatores de risco e comorbidades nos pacientes com doença arterial obstrutiva periférica estão sendo sub-realizados.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this survey was to evaluate how patients with peripheral obstructive arterial disease have been treated, concerning risk factors and comorbidities. METHOD: A questionnaire was applied to all physicians attending the monthly meeting of the Brazilian Society of Angiology and Vascular Surgery - São Paulo Section. Questions were asked about the following major risk factors: treatment of dyslipidemia, diabetes, exercise regimens, antiplatelet therapy, smoking and arterial hypertension. RESULTS: Of the 102 questionnaires, 75 were answered (response rate of 73.5 percent). Of these, 82 percent routinely measure cholesterol levels and 20 percent aim at an LDL cholesterol target below 100 mg/dl; 94 percent perform a screening for diabetes mellitus; 97 percent recommend patients to an exercise program; 79 percent prescribe aspirin; 97 percent recommend patients to quit smoking and 60 percent only do it by counseling; 18 percent do not measure blood pressure and 19 percent have a target pressure of 130 x 80 mmHg. Considering the recommendations as a whole - lifestyle intervention in order to quit smoking, aerobic exercise, prescription of antiplatelet therapy, screening for diabetes mellitus, rigorous control of blood pressure and lipids - it was observed that 7 percent of interviewees follow all of them as an established routine. CONCLUSION: The present study showed that patients with peripheral arterial disease are currently undertreated with regard to the screening and treatment of risk factors and comorbidities.

Safety of perioperative statin use in high-risk patients undergoing major vascular surgery.

No clinical data are available on the influence of perioperative statin use on postoperative myopathy in patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery except for some case reports. Therefore, the aim of this study was to clarify the potential risk of myopathy in statin users who underwent major noncardiac surgery.

Reduction in cardiovascular events after vascular surgery with atorvastatin: a randomized trial.

OBJECTIVES: This prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial was performed to analyze the effect of atorvastatin compared with placebo on the occurrence of a 6-month composite of cardiovascular events after vascular surgery. Cardiovascular complications are the most important cause of perioperative morbidity and mortality among patients undergoing vascular surgery. Statin therapy may reduce perioperative cardiac events through stabilization of coronary plaques. METHODS: One hundred patients were randomly assigned to receive 20 mg atorvastatin or placebo once a day for 45 days, irrespective of their serum cholesterol concentration. Vascular surgery was performed on average 30 days after randomization, and patients were prospectively followed up over 6 months. The cardiovascular events studied were death from cardiac cause, nonfatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina, and stroke. RESULTS: Fifty patients received atorvastatin, and 50 received placebo. During the 6-month follow-up primary end points occurred in 17 patients, 4 in the atorvastatin group and 13 in the placebo group. The incidence of cardiac events was more than three times higher with placebo (26.0%) compared with atorvastatin (8.0%; P =.031). The risk for an event was compared between the groups with the Kaplan-Meier method, as event-free survival after vascular surgery. Patients given atorvastatin exhibited a significant decrease in the rate of cardiac events, compared with the placebo group, within 6 months after vascular surgery (P =.018). CONCLUSION: Short-term treatment with atorvastatin significantly reduces the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events after vascular surgery.

Treatment of acromegaly improves myocardial abnormalities.

BACKGROUND: Treatment for acromegaly decreases left ventricular (LV) mass, but it is not clear whether diastolic dysfunction is also reversible. With Doppler echocardiography, before and after effective therapy, we assessed the LV morphology and function of patients with acromegaly who were free of complications. METHODS: In 15 patients with active acromegaly (age range, 33.4 +/- 9.3 years), we compared LV Doppler echocardiographic indices, before and after transsphenoidal surgery or radiotherapy or before and after both procedures, noting a significant drop in plasma levels of growth hormone (<2.0 ng/mL after oral glucose tolerance testing). Patients did not have arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, thyroid dysfunction, or coronary artery disease. Occasionally, in this series, patients had no symptoms of heart failure, and patients who underwent treatment with somatostatin analog drugs were not included because they did not have a significant hormonal drop. The follow-up period after hormonal control was 2.7 +/- 1.7 years. We also studied 15 healthy control subjects matched for age, sex, and body surface area. RESULTS: Patients with acromegaly compared with healthy control subjects had increased LV mass index, relative wall thickness, and deteriorated diastolic function. After therapy, most of the abnormalities improved: LV mass index (104 +/- 21 g/m(2) x 87 +/- 21 g/m(2); P <.01), LV relative wall thickness (0.40 +/- 0.06 x 0.35 +/- 0.04; P <.01), proto/telediastolic transmitral peak flow velocity ratio (1.17 +/- 0.33 x 1.49 +/- 0.34; P <.001), and isovolumetric relaxation period (126 +/- 18 ms x 113 +/- 13 ms; P <.05). CONCLUSION: Treatment of acromegaly in patients without clinical heart failure improves both LV morphology and diastolic function. Avoidance of progression to more advanced forms of acromegalic cardiomyopathy should be possible.