Critically Ill Older Adults' Representation in Intervention Trials: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVES: Older adults may be under-represented in critical care research, and results may not apply to this specific population. Our primary objective was to evaluate the prevalence of inclusion of older adults across critical care trials focused on common ICU conditions or interventions. Our secondary objective was to evaluate whether older age was used as a stratification variable for randomization or outcome analysis. DESIGN SETTING AND SUBJECTS: We performed a systematic review of previously published systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in critical care. We searched PubMed, Ovid, CENTRAL, and Cochrane from 2009 to 2022. Systematic reviews of any interventions across five topics: acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), sepsis/shock, nutrition, sedation, and mobilization were eligible. MAIN RESULTS: We identified 216 systematic reviews and included a total of 253 RCTs and 113,090 patients. We extracted baseline characteristics and the reported proportion of older adults. We assessed whether any upper age limit was an exclusion criterion for trials, whether age was used for stratification during randomization or data analysis, and if age-specific subgroup analysis was present. The most prevalent topic was sepsis (78 trials, 31%), followed by nutrition (62 trials, 25%), ARDS (39 trials, 15%), mobilization (38 trials, 15%), and sedation (36 trials, 14%). Eighteen trials (7%) had exclusion criteria based on older age. Age distribution with information on older adults prevalence was given in six trials (2%). Age was considered in the analysis of ten trials (5%) using analytic methods to evaluate the outcome stratified by age. Conclusions: In this systematic review, the proportion of older critically ill patients is undetermined, and it is unclear how age is or is not an effect modifier or to what extent the results are valid for older adult groups. Reporting age is important to guide clinicians in personalizing care. These results highlight the importance of incorporating older critically ill patients in future trials to ensure the results are generalizable to this growing population.

Adrenal venous sampling in primary aldosteronism: multinomial regression modeling to detect aldosterone secretion lateralization when right adrenal sampling is missing.

OBJECTIVE: Difficulty to recognize or canulate the right adrenal vein is the most frequent cause of adrenal venous sampling (AVS) failure. We aimed to assess multinomial regression modeling (MRM) of peripheral and left adrenal vein samplings to detect lateralization of aldosterone secretion when the right AVS is missing. METHODS: Simultaneous bilateral AVS samplings were performed before (basal) and after intravenous cosyntropin injection in 188 consecutive patients between December 1989 and September 2015. Different reference standards for lateralization of aldosterone secretion were defined for basal and for postcosyntropin AVS and according to lateralization index cutoffs at least 2 and at least 4. MRMs were built to detect lateralization of aldosterone secretion according to these reference standards using only peripheral and left adrenal veins samplings (without the right AVS). Detection accuracy was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves and detection sensitivities were reported for specificity at least 95%. RESULTS: For basal AVS with lateralization index at least 2, AUROC were respectively 0.931 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.894-0.968] and 0.922 (95% CI 0.882-0.962) for right and left lateralization of aldosterone secretion detection and MRM could detect respectively 65.5 and 62.7% of the right and left lateralization of aldosterone secretion. For AVS after cosyntropin with lateralization index at least 4, AUROC were respectively 0.964 (95% CI: 0.940-0.987) and 0.955 (95% CI: 0.927-0.983) for right and left lateralization of aldosterone secretion, and MRM could detect respectively 77.2 and 72.9% of the right and left lateralization of aldosterone secretion. CONCLUSION: MRM can detect lateralization of aldosterone secretion without the right AVS in most patients and could eliminate the need for repeat AVS when right adrenal vein canulation is nonselective or impossible.