Evaluation of carotid intima-media thickness with vascular endothelial growth factor and malondialdehyde levels in patients with sarcoidosis.

PURPOSE: To assess the impact of sarcoidosis on endothelial function by measuring carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) and serum levels of malondialdehyde and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively analyzed 41 patients with sarcoidosis (9 men, 32 women) with a mean age of 44.9±10.2 (SD) years and 34 healthy subjects (9 men, 24 women) with a mean age of 37.26±8.9 (SD) years who served as a control group. Sarcoidosis patients receiving steroids were included in Group 1 while those not under steroid treatment were included in Group 2. CIMT measurements were performed using B-mode ultrasound. Malondialdehyde and VEGF serum levels were obtained in all sarcoidosis patients and control subjects. RESULTS: Both right and left CIMT was significantly higher in Group 1 and Group 2 than in control subjects. Serum levels of malondialdehyde and VEGF in Group 1 and Group 2 were significantly higher than in healthy subjects. No differences in CIMT, malondialdehyde and VEGF were found between Group 1 and Group 2. CONCLUSION: Sarcoidosis results in increased CIMT, VEGF and malondialdehyde serum levels. However, there was no difference in terms of CIMT, VEGF and malondialdehyde levels between sarcoidosis patients with or without steroid treatment, suggesting that new treatment strategies for sarcoidosis vascular involvement should consider this result.

[Real-time MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy in biopsy-naïve and pre-biopsied patients with suspicion for prostate cancer]. / Die Echtzeit-MRT/US-Fusionsbiopsie in Patienten mit und ohne Vorbiopsie mit Verdacht auf ein Prostatakarzinom.

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/ultrasound (US) fusion-guided biopsy detects more prostate cancer (PCa) than transrectal US (TRUS)-guided biopsy in patients with an indication for prostate re-biopsy. The aim of this study was a) to compare the detection rates of MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy with conventional TRUS in a double centre cohort and b) to investigate the influence of the number of pre-biopsies on the PCa detection rate. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In the period from January 2012 to July 2014, 310 consecutive patients gave written informed consent and underwent 3 Tesla MRI scans of the prostate. All patients had at least one PCa suspicious lesion in the MRI and were biopsied by MRI/US fusion followed by a conventional 10-core biopsy of the prostate. Detection rates based on technique, Gleason score and number of pre-biopsies were calculated. RESULTS: The overall detection rate of the study was 51% (158 patients). Among these 158 patients a histopathological Gleason score of 6 was detected in 60 patients (38%), a Gleason score of 7 in 54 patients (34%) and a Gleason score≥8 in 44 patients (28%). MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy detected 110 (69.7%) of the overall detected 158 PCa. TRUS-guided biopsy detected a higher rate of Gleason score 6 (54%) and a lower rate of Gleason score≥8 (15%) lesions in comparison to 38% Gleason 6 and 28% Gleason≥8 in the MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy, respectively. Furthermore, a lower Gleason score was observed in patients with more than one pre-biopsy. The detection rate in biopsy-naïve patients undergoing MRI/US fusion was 75% (40 patients) among 75% detected Gleason score≥7. CONCLUSION: MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy detected more PCa and also more clinically significant cancer than conventional TRUS. In our cohort patients with more than one pre-biopsy showed lower Gleason scores. The included patients with an initial MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy should be further investigated.

The hyperechoic zone around breast lesions - an indirect parameter of malignancy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate an irregular perilesional hyperechoic zone as a potential criterion of malignancy on breast ultrasound and to test whether this zone correlates with perilesional T2 hyperintensity on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 137 patients (85 malignant lesions, 52 benign lesions) who underwent breast ultrasound with a 9 - 14 MHz linear broad-spectrum transducer and consecutive ultrasound-guided biopsy were included. All patients additionally underwent breast MR imaging with dedicated breast coils at 1.5 T. The protocol included a T2-weighted sequence. Perilesional hyperechoic and T2 hyperintense areas were measured by planimetry using the slice showing maximum extension of this area. The sensitivity and specificity of the perifocal area for identifying breast malignancy were determined using ROC analysis. Correlation was assessed using Pearson analysis. RESULTS: The presence of a hyperechoic zone identified malignancy with a sensitivity of 87% and a specificity of 81%. Additionally, there was a highly significant correlation of the size of the hyperechoic zone with the degree of tumor differentiation (p = 0.002) as well as with the mib-1 proliferation index (p = 0.006) and lymphangio-invasion (p = 0.02). No significant correlation was found between the hyperchoic zone and the T2 hyperintense zone on MRI (R2 = 0.16). CONCLUSION: A hyperechoic zone surrounding breast lesions may serve as an additional sonomorphologic criterion of malignancy. Yet, it does not seem to correlate with edema on MRI.

[Real-time MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy improves detection rates of prostate cancer in pre-biopsied patients]. / Die Echtzeit-MRT/US-Fusionsbiopsie verbessert die Detektionsrate des Prostatakarzinoms nach mehrfach negativen Vorbiopsien.

BACKGROUND: According to the guidelines of the European Association of Urology (EAU) on prostate cancer (PCa) in 2013, patients with increasing prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, suspicious digital rectal examination (DRE) or high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia after negative prostate biopsy (PB) should undergo a repeat biopsy. Low cancer detection rates in the repeat biopsy illuminate the dilemma of the international gold standard of transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided PB in the detection of PCa. Our study evaluated the combination of TRUS and prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and its reported high sensitivities and high specificities by using real-time MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy. The detection of clinically significant PCa was investigated. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 128 consecutive patients in the period of January 2012 to August 2013 were included. All patients had at least one TRUS-guided biopsy with negative findings and the clinical indication for a systematic re-biopsy. Prior to the MRI/US fusion all patients underwent a 3 Tesla prostate MRI without endorectal coil. The MRI data were uploaded to a modern US system. The B-mode, power-mode, elastography and CEUS imaging were used to classify the suspicious lesions from the MRI on a scale of 0-3 and a US sum score was calculated. The lesion was consecutively biopsied by real-time MRI/US fusion followed by a systematic 10 core biopsy. RESULTS: Among 128 patients 51 PCa could be detected (39.8%). From these 51 PCa cases, clinically significant PCa was detected by MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy as follows: Gleason score >7 in 9 of 10 patients; Gleason score=7 in 14 of 20 patients and Gleason score <7 in 13 of 21 patients. A positive correlation was shown between the US sum score and the associated PI-RADS score in 65 patients in whom lesions were classified by PI-RADS. A positive correlation was further shown between the US sum score and the Gleason score of all suspicious and biopsied lesions. MRI/US fusion and TRUS-guided biopsy combined, detected 30 of 51 PCa; 6 of 51 PCa were detected by MRI/US fusion alone and 15 of 51 PCa by conventional TRUS-guided biopsy alone. CONCLUSION: Real-time MR/US fusion increases detection rates of PCa in patients undergoing repeat biopsy. Especially, clinically significant PCa with a Gleason score ≥ 7 were almost exclusively detected by MR/US fusion-guided biopsy.

Detection of microcalcifications in women with dense breasts and hypoechoic focal lesions: comparison of mammography and ultrasound.

PURPOSE: Microcalcifications in the breasts can point to breast cancer. However, there is great morphologic variety, and microcalcifications do not always correlate with malignancy. We conducted a prospective study to compare ultrasound and mammography in the detection of microcalcifications following sonographic diagnosis of a hypoechoic focal lesion in women with dense breast composition. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 104 lesions potentially associated with microcalcifications (82 malignant and 23 benign lesions) were included in the study. The breast was examined by ultrasound (9 MHz, Aplio XG/500) with additional use of MicroPure imaging for the demonstration and evaluation of microcalcifications. The presence of a focal lesion was verified and microcalcifications were counted at ultrasound and mammography by blinded readers. The sensitivity and specificity were determined, and ROC analysis and AUC analysis were performed. RESULTS: The women had a median age of 51 years. The average number of microcalcifications detected by sonography (2.12 ±â€Š2.77) and mammography (3.59 ±â€Š6.35) was not significantly different (p > 0.05). Correlation of the techniques was adequate (Pearson's r = 0.616, p < 0.0001; Spearman's rho = 0.654, p < 0.0001). The intraclass correlation coefficient was K = 0.382 ±â€Š0.072 (p < 0.0001), also indicating adequate agreement of both techniques. The sensitivity and specificity were 70%/30% for MicroPure and 45%/55% for mammography. The positive predictive value of mammography was superior to that of MicroPure (88% vs. 78%). CONCLUSION: The sonographic detection of microcalcifications with MicroPure imaging in breasts with a hypoechoic focal lesion correlates well with digital mammography.

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of prostate cancer.

Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy in men, but only about 10% of patients die from that cancer. Recent studies suggest that not all patients benefit from a radical therapeutic approach. When prostate cancer is suspected, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can make an important contribution to cancer localization within the prostate. Many studies show that T2-weighted morphologic imaging should be supplemented by multiparametric MRI techniques including diffusion-weighted imaging, contrast-enhanced sequences, and MR spectroscopy. This approach detects aggressive prostate cancer with high sensitivity and specificity. The findings of multiparametric MRI additionally contribute information to the assessment of cancer aggressiveness. The use of these multiparametric MRI techniques will gain an increasing role in the clinical management of prostate cancer patients. They can help in establishing a definitive diagnosis with a minimum of invasiveness and may also contribute to optimal individualized treatment. This review article presents the different techniques of multiparametric MRI and discusses their contribution to the detection of prostate cancer. Moreover, this review outlines an objective approach to image interpretation and structured reporting of MRI findings using the PI-RADS criteria. The review concludes with an outline of approaches to prostate biopsy on the basis of MRI (transrectal ultrasound, direct MRI guidance of tissue sampling, and MRI-ultrasound fusion biopsy) and emerging future uses of MRI in the planning of focal treatment options and in the active surveillance of patients diagnosed with prostate cancer.

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of prostate cancer.

Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy in men, but only about 10 % of patients die from that cancer. Recent studies suggest that not all patients benefit from a radical therapeutic approach. When prostate cancer is suspected, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can make an important contribution to cancer localization within the prostate. Many studies show that T2-weighted morphologic imaging should be supplemented by multiparametric MRI techniques including diffusion-weighted imaging, contrast-enhanced sequences, and MR spectroscopy. This approach detects aggressive prostate cancer with high sensitivity and specificity. The findings of multiparametric MRI additionally contribute information to the assessment of cancer aggressiveness. The use of these multiparametric MRI techniques will gain an increasing role in the clinical management of prostate cancer patients. They can help in establishing a definitive diagnosis with a minimum of invasiveness and may also contribute to optimal individualized treatment. This review article presents the different techniques of multiparametric MRI and discusses their contribution to the detection of prostate cancer. Moreover, this review outlines an objective approach to image interpretation and structured reporting of MRI findings using the PI-RADS criteria. The review concludes with an outline of approaches to prostate biopsy on the basis of MRI (transrectal ultrasound, direct MRI guidance of tissue sampling, and MRI-ultrasound fusion biopsy) and emerging future uses of MRI in the planning of focal treatment options and in the active surveillance of patients diagnosed with prostate cancer.

Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of the prostate: comparison of gadobutrol and Gd-DTPA.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the enhancement profile of the macrocyclic contrast medium (CM) gadobutrol in comparison to linear CM Gd-DTPA in DCE-MRI of the prostate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total 53 patients with prostata cancer (PCa) were included, who received a radical prostatectomy after multiparametric MRI of the prostate including DCE-MRI. Using circular regions of interests normal peripheral zone (PZ) and PCa foci > 5 mm in diameter (42 and 34 foci in Gd-DTPA and gadobutrol group, respectively) were analysed in DCE-MRI. Enhancement curves (Type I, II and III) and pharmacokinetic parameters were analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively and compared using mixed linear models (two sided p-values < 0.05 were regarded significant). RESULTS: There was no significant difference in frequencies of curve types I, II or III in the normal PZ (p = 0.63) or in PCa foci (p = 0.75). PCa with a Gleason score ≥ 7 had in comparison to Gleason ≤ 6 significantly more often a Wash-Out-curve (Type III) with both CM (p = 0.02). The relative peak enhancement was in the PZ (Gd-DTPA 1.4 a. u. [1.20; 1.59], gadobutrol 1.58 a. u. [1.37; 1.78]) and in PCa foci (Gd-DTPA 1.56 a. u. [1.41; 1.71], gadobutrol 1.76 a. u. [1.59; 1.94]) significantly higher with gadobutrol (p = 0.04). The pharmacokinetic parameters Ktrans und kep were higher in PCa foci than in PZ (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.002, respectively) without significant difference of the parameter values between both CM (p = 0.65). CONCLUSION: [corrected] This study is the first systematic comparison of gadobutrol and Gd-DTPA in DCE-MRI of the prostate. The relative peak enhancement is higher using gadobutrol compared to Gd-DTPA in DCE-MRI. There was no statistically significant difference in curve types or the pharmacokinetic parameters in PCa or normal PZ between both CM.

[Detection of prostate cancer by real-time MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy: 3T MRI and state of the art sonography]. / Detektion des Prostatakarzinoms durch Echtzeit-MRT/US-Fusionsbiopsie: 3T MRT und moderne Ultraschalltechnik.

PURPOSE: Multiparametric MRI of the prostate is a noninvasive diagnostic method with high sensitivity and specificity for prostate cancer. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether prostate cancer detection rates of transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsy may be improved by an image fusion of state-of-the-art ultrasound (CEUS, elastography) and MR (T2w, DWI) imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 32 consecutive patients with a history of elevated PSA levels and at least one negative TRUS-guided biopsy with clinical indication for a systematic re-biopsy underwent multiparametric 3 T MRI without endorectal coil. MR data (T2w) were uploaded to a modern sonography system and image fusion was performed in real-time mode during biopsy. B-mode, Doppler, elastography and CEUS imaging were applied to characterize suspicious lesions detected by MRI. Targeted biopsies were performed in MR/US fusion mode followed by a systematic standard TRUS-guided biopsy. Detection rates for both methods were calculated and compared using the Chi²-test. RESULTS: Patient age was not significantly different in patients with and without histologically confirmed prostate cancer (65.2 ± 8.0 and 64.1 ± 7.3 age [p = 0.93]). The PSA value was significantly higher in patients with prostate cancer (15.5 ± 9.3 ng/ml) compared to patients without cancer (PSA 10.4 ± 9.6 ng/ml; p = 0.02). The proportion of histologically confirmed cancers in the study group (n = 32) of the MR/US fusion biopsy (11/12; 34.4 %) was significantly higher (p = 0.01) in comparison to the TRUS systematic biopsy (6/12; 18.8 %). CONCLUSION: Real-time MR/US image fusion may enhance cancer detection rates of TRUS-guided biopsies and should therefore be studied in further larger studies.