Physiological properties of indigenous lytic bacteriophages as monophage suspension and cocktail against poultry-adapted typhoidal Salmonella variants.

The emergence and spread of multidrug resistance among pathogens of the agro-food sector is increasing at an alarming rate, which has directed attention to the search for alternative to antibiotic therapy. The present work studied the physiological and population dynamics of lytic bacteriophages against avian-adapted Salmonella. Out of 28 positive samples, four bacteriophage isolates (SalØ-ABF37, SalØ-RCMPF12, SalØ-MCOH26, SalØ-DNLS42) were selected based on their ability to clearly lyse bacterial test strains. The isolates propagated were active against closely related D1 serotypes, i.e., S. Enteritidis and S. Typhimurium, with no heterologous activity against Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 and Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 23235. Each of the monophage suspension and cocktail efficiently suppressed the bacterial count from exponential increase in comparison to the untreated bacterial control. The bacterial turbidity was recorded as 0.244 at λ600 during 400 min of co-incubation, in contrast to bacterial control showing λ600 = 0.669. The latent period was recorded to be 25, 35, 25 and 30 for SalØ-ABF37, SalØ-RCMPF12, SalØ-MCOH26 and SalØ-DNLS42, with 73.00, 97.00, 132 and 75.00 PFU cell-1, respectively. The highest lytic activity was seen at 37.00 ˚C - 42.00 ˚C, with phage particle count being fairly stable at pH 3.00 - 9.00. Each of the isolates possessed dsDNA by being resistant to RNase A. The current study concludes that lytic phages are promising alternative to combat multidrug resistant superbugs. The physiological characterization and bacterial growth inhibition are important parameters in standardization of phage therapy.

A Cross-Sectional Survey to Assess Biorisk Management System in Research and Diagnostic Laboratories in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.

Financial, cultural, and managerial hurdles have made biosafety and biosecurity measures difficult in resource-constrained countries like Pakistan. Because of increasing awareness of biorisk management, diagnostic and research laboratories have made major advances in biosafety and biosecurity in the recent decade. As a result, identifying and addressing gaps in biorisk management has never been more critical. The purpose of this study was to assess the current situation of personal protective equipment (PPE), biosafety behavior, waste management, biosafety and biosecurity measures, training and safety, and health services in diagnostic and research laboratories across Pakistan's Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) province. We adapted the WHO Laboratory Assessment tool (2012) and CWA 15793 (Biorisk management guidelines) for conducting a cross-sectional survey, which was distributed among various laboratories in KP. The survey included 30 laboratories, including 11 diagnostic and 19 research laboratories. In comparison to diagnostic laboratories, biorisk management practices in research laboratories were better in terms of PPE, biosafety behavior, waste management, biosafety measures, biosecurity measures, trainings, and safety and health services. KP laboratories' biorisk management practices have improved over time, according to our findings. However, we were able to identify inadequacies that would require considerable improvements to the current setups based on the WHO and CWA 15793 recommendations. Organizations can tailor their biosafety measures and training to address identified gaps using the presented KP snapshot.