Radiographic assessment of acute vs chronic vertebral compression fractures.

PURPOSE: Distinguishing between acute and chronic vertebral compression fractures typically requires advanced imaging techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Recognizing specific radiographic findings associated with fracture acuity may improve the accuracy of radiographic assessment. METHODS: Patients with compression fractures that had both radiographic and MRI studies of the lumbar spine within a 30-day time frame were retrospectively reviewed. MRI studies were used to determine compression fracture acuity. Radiographs were interpreted by a separate group of radiologists blinded to the MRI results. Radiographic findings of endplate osteophyte, subendplate density, subendplate cleft, and subendplate cyst were recorded as was the overall impression of fracture acuity. RESULTS: Sensitivity and specificity for radiographic reporting of acute fracture were 0.52 (95% CI: 0.42, 0.61) and 0.95 (95% CI: 0.93, 0.97) respectively. For chronic fractures, the sensitivity and specificity were 0.52 (95% CI: 0.41, 0.63) and 0.94 (95% CI: 0.92, 0.96). The radiographic presence of a subendplate cleft increased the odds of a fracture being acute by a factor of 1.75 (95% CI: 1.09, 2.81; P = 0.0202). The radiographic presence of subendplate density increased the odds of a fracture being acute by a factor of 1.78 (95% CI: 1.21, 2.63; P = 0.0037). The presence of an endplate osteophyte or subendplate cyst was not significantly associated with fracture acuity. CONCLUSION: Radiographs are relatively insensitive in distinguishing between acute and chronic lumbar compression fractures but the presence of a subendplate cleft or subendplate density increases the likelihood that a given fracture is acute.

Mass-Like Fat at the Medial Midfoot: A Common Pseudolesion.

Background Fatty masses are common and may be encountered in the foot and ankle. In some cases, normal subcutaneous fat may be mistaken for a discrete mass. Aims The aim of this study was to evaluate the common finding of prominent subcutaneous fat at the medial midfoot resembling a lipoma and to determine the prevalence of this pseudolesion by applying a series of potential size cutoff criteria. Materials and Methods Three musculoskeletal radiologists retrospectively evaluated 91 sequentially performed magnetic resonance imaging examinations of the ankle to measure fat resembling a discrete lipoma at the medial midfoot. Each blinded reader measured the largest area of continuous subcutaneous fat in orthogonal axial, coronal craniocaudal, and coronal transverse dimensions. Patient age, sex, and study indications were also recorded. Statistical analysis was performed with R and SAS 9.4 software Results A discrete fatty pseudolesion as defined by measuring at least 1 cm in all planes by measurements of at least two of three readers was present in 87% of cases (79 of 91). When a size criterion of 1.5 cm was used, a pseudolesion was documented in 14% of cases (13 of 91). There was a significant correlation between larger pseudolesion size and female sex in the axial plane; however, there was no correlation in the coronal craniocaudal and coronal transverse dimensions. Conclusions Subcutaneous fat at the medial midfoot often has a mass-like appearance that could be mistaken for a lipoma. It is important to recognize this pseudolesion variant and not to confuse the imaging appearance for a discrete mass.