Treatments for Moderate-to-Severe Acne Vulgaris: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Multiple treatment options exist for the management of moderate-to-severe acne. However, the comparative effectiveness (efficacy/safety) of moderate-to-severe acne treatments has not been systematically examined. METHODS: A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials of ≥4 weeks of treatment (topical, oral, physical, or combinations) for moderate-to-severe facial acne in patients aged ≥9 years. Efficacy outcomes included: percentage of patients achieving ≥2-grade reduction from baseline and “clear” or “almost clear” for global severity score (treatment success); absolute change in inflammatory (ILs reduction); and noninflammatory lesion counts (NILs reduction). A random-effects network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted for the efficacy outcomes. Treatments were ranked with posterior rank plots and surface under cumulative ranking values.  Results: Eighty-five studies were included in the SLR/NMA. Topical triple-agent fixed-dose combination (FDC) gel (clindamycin phosphate 1.2%/adapalene 0.15%/benzoyl peroxide 3.1%) and combinations of double-agent fixed-dose topical treatments with oral antibiotics (TOA3) consistently ranked in the top 3 treatments. Topical triple-agent FDC gel was numerically superior to TOA3 for treatment success (log-odds ratios: 1.84 [95% credible interval (CrI) 1.36 to 2.29]) and 1.69 (95% CrI: 1.01 to 2.32) vs placebo/vehicle). TOA3 was numerically superior to topical triple-agent FDC gel for reduction of ILs (mean difference: -8.21 [-10.33 to -6.13]) and -10.40 [-13.44 to -7.14] vs placebo/vehicle) and NILs (mean difference: -13.41 [-16.69 to -10.32] and -17.74 [-22.56 to -12.85] vs placebo/vehicle). CONCLUSIONS: Based on this SLR/NMA, topical triple-agent FDC gel was the most efficacious and safe treatment for moderate-to-severe acne. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(4):     doi:10.36849/JDD.8148.

Post-Hoc Exploratory Pooled Analysis of the Impact of IDP-126 Gel on QoL in Moderate-to-Severe Acne.

BACKGROUND: Acne has psychosocial effects on patient's quality of life (QoL). This post hoc exploratory analysis of pooled phase 3 data assessed the impact of investigational IDP-126 gel (for moderate to severe acne) on the Acne-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (Acne-QoL; exploratory endpoint in the trials).  Methods: A post hoc exploratory analysis using pooled data (N=309; age ≥13 years) was conducted to assess if 1) changes from baseline to week 12 in Acne-QoL domain scores significantly differ by treatment; 2) differences were clinically meaningful, and 3) relative importance of acne severity as measured by the Evaluator's Global Severity Score (EGSS) or lesion counts explains the changes in QoL (Acne-QoL).  Results: Acne-QoL domain scores significantly (P<0.001, each) improved for patients treated with IDP-126 Gel vs vehicle in all four domains (role-emotional [least squares mean difference {LSMean} 4.1], self-perception [LSMean 3.8], acne symptoms [LSMean 2.6], and role-social [LSMean 2.0]). The proportion of responders was significantly higher (P<0.05, each) in the IDP-126 Gel group vs vehicle across Acne-QoL domains, self-perception (odds ratio [OR]: 4.32), acne symptoms (OR: 3.90), role-social (OR: 3.59), and role-emotional (OR: 2.50). Across all Acne QoL domains, the improvement on the EGSS endpoint (53.8-63.3%) was more likely to influence QoL improvements than the inflammatory (20.1-33.4%) and non-inflammatory lesion (9.5-18.7%) counts.  Conclusions: This post hoc exploratory analysis of pooled phase 3 data (moderate to severe acne) suggests that treatment with IDP 126 Gel led to statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in QoL and improvement in QoL was primarily influenced by EGSS.J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(10):1033-1039      doi:10.36849/JDD.7812.