Physiology of blood flow during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. A transesophageal echocardiographic study.

BACKGROUND: There are two competing theories of the mechanism of blood flow during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The "cardiac pump" theory postulates that blood flows because the heart is squeezed between the sternum and the spine. The "thoracic pump" theory postulates that blood flows from the thorax because intrathoracic pressure exceeds extrathoracic vascular pressure and that flow is restricted to the venous-to-arterial direction because of venous valves that prevent retrograde flow at the thoracic inlet. To determine which mechanism is operative during actual cardiopulmonary resuscitation, 20 patients were imaged with transesophageal echocardiography during resuscitation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Transesophageal two-dimensional and pulse Doppler echocardiography was begun within 7 minutes of initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. In the 18 patients who could be analyzed, the mitral valve opened during the release phase (diastole) and closed during the compression phase (systole) of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Mitral velocity-time integral measured 8 +/- 3 cm during diastole. There was compression of right and left ventricular cavities with significant reduction in measured left ventricular volume during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. In five patients, mitral regurgitation was present. CONCLUSIONS: Transesophageal echocardiography performed during actual cardiopulmonary resuscitation showing mitral valve opening during cardiac release, reduction of ventricular cavity size with compression, and atrioventricular regurgitation support the cardiac pump theory of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. This study demonstrates the feasibility and usefulness of transesophageal echocardiography during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Active compression-decompression resuscitation: a novel method of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Chest compression is an important part of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), but it only aids circulation during a portion of the compression cycle and has been shown to only minimally increase blood flow to vital organs. The purpose of this study was to quantitate the short-term hemodynamic effects of CPR with a hand-held suction device that incorporates both active compression and decompression of the chest. The suction device was applied to the middle of the sternum and compared with standard manual CPR in eight nonventilated anesthetized dogs. Coronary perfusion pressure, systolic and diastolic aortic pressures, right atrial diastolic pressure, and the velocity time integral (an analog of cardiac output), which were obtained by means of transesophageal pulsed wave Doppler echocardiography from the main pulmonary artery, were measured every 30 seconds during CPR. Minute ventilation was measured over the last minute of each CPR technique. Both active compression-decompression CPR and standard CPR were sequentially performed for 2 minutes in random order 30 seconds after induced ventricular fibrillation. The CPR techniques consisted of 100 compressions per minute, with a compression depth of 1.5 to 2 inches and a 50% duty cycle. Coronary perfusion pressure, velocity time integral (cardiac output analog), minute ventilation, and systolic arterial pressure were all significantly improved by active compression-decompression CPR when compared with standard CPR. We conclude that active compression-decompression CPR is a simple technique that appears to improve coronary perfusion pressure, systolic arterial pressure, cardiac output, and minute ventilation in nonventilated animals when compared with standard CPR.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Active compression-decompression. A new method of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Working Group.

OBJECTIVE: To describe and compare with standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in humans a new form of CPR that involves both active compression and active decompression of the chest. DESIGN: Patients in cardiac arrest in whom standard advanced cardiac life support failed were randomized to receive 2 minutes of either standard or active compression-decompression (ACD) CPR using a custom, hand-held suction device, followed by 2 minutes of the alternate technique. The ACD device was applied midsternum and used to perform CPR according to the guidelines of the American Heart Association: 80 compressions per minute, compression depth of 3.8 to 5 cm, 50% duty cycle, and constant-volume ventilation. Mechanical Thumper CPR was also compared in five patients. End-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) concentrations and hemodynamic variables were measured. Transesophageal Doppler echocardiography was used to assess contractility, the velocity time integral (an analogue of cardiac output), and diastolic myocardial filling times. RESULTS: Ten patients were enrolled. The mean +/- SD ETCO2 was 4.3 +/- 3.8 mm Hg with standard CPR and 9.0 +/- 3.9 mm Hg with ACD CPR (P less than .0001). Systolic arterial pressure with standard CPR was 52.5 +/- 14.0 mm Hg and with ACD CPR, 88.9 +/- 24.7 mm Hg (P less than .003). The velocity time integral increased from 7.3 +/- 2.6 cm with standard CPR to 17.5 +/- 5.6 cm with ACD CPR (P less than .0001), and diastolic filling times increased from 0.23 +/- .09 seconds with standard CPR to 0.37 +/- .12 seconds with ACD CPR (P less than .004). Mechanical Thumper CPR consistently underperformed both standard and ACD CPR. Minute ventilation obtained in four patients during ACD CPR without endotracheal ventilation was 6.6 +/- 0.9 L/min. After 1 hour of standard CPR failed, three of 10 patients randomized to ACD CPR rapidly converted to a hemodynamically stable rhythm following 2 minutes of ACD CPR. CONCLUSION: ACD CPR is a simple manual technique that improved cardiopulmonary circulation in 10 patients during cardiac arrest. Although ACD CPR may have produced a return of spontaneous circulation in three patients refractory to standard measures, its impact on survival when used early in cardiac arrest remains to be determined.