A study protocol for quantifying patient preferences in neuromuscular disorders: a case study of the IMI PREFER Project.

Objectives: Patient preference studies are increasingly used to inform decision-making during the medical product lifecycle but are rarely used to inform early stages of drug development.  The primary aim of this study is to quantify treatment preferences of patients with neuromuscular disorders, which represent serious and debilitating conditions with limited or no treatment options available. Methods: This quantitative patient preferences study was designed as an online survey, with a cross-over design.  This study will target two different diseases from the neuromuscular disorders disease group, myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) and mitochondrial myopathies (MM). Despite having different physio-pathological pathways both DM1 and MM manifest in a clinically similar manner and may benefit from similar treatment options.  The sample will be stratified into three subgroups: two patient groups differentiated by age of symptom onset and one caregivers group.   Each subgroup will be randomly assigned to complete two of three different preference elicitation methods at two different time points: Q-methodology survey, discrete choice experiment, and best-worst scaling type 2, allowing cross-comparisons of the results across each study time within participants and within elicitation methods. Additional variables such as sociodemographic, clinical and health literacy will be collected to enable analysis of potential heterogeneity. Ethics and Dissemination: This study protocol has undergone ethical review and approval by the Newcastle University R&D Ethics Committee (Ref: 15169/2018). All participants will be invited to give electronic informed consent to take part in the study prior accessing the online survey. All electronic data will be anonymised prior analysis. This study is part of the Patient Preferences in Benefit-Risk Assessments during the Drug Life Cycle (IMI-PREFER) project, a public-private collaborative research project aiming to develop expert and evidence-based recommendations on how and when patient preferences can be assessed and used to inform medical product decision making.

Derivation and validation of a cytokine-based assay to screen for acute rejection in renal transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Acute rejection remains a problem in renal transplantation. This study sought to determine the utility of a noninvasive cytokine assay in screening of acute rejection. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: In this observational cross-sectional study, 64 patients from two centers were recruited upon admission for allograft biopsy to investigate acute graft dysfunction. Blood was collected before biopsy and assayed for a panel of 21 cytokines secreted by PBMCs. Patients were classified as acute rejectors or nonrejectors according to a classification rule derived from an initial set of 32 patients (training cohort) and subsequently validated in the remaining patients (validation cohort). RESULTS: Although six cytokines (IL-1ß, IL-6, TNF-α, IL-4, GM-CSF, and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1) distinguished acute rejectors in the training cohort, logistic regression modeling identified a single cytokine, IL-6, as the best predictor. In the validation cohort, IL-6 was consistently the most accurate cytokine (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve, 0.85; P=0.006), whereas the application of a prespecified cutoff level, as determined from the training cohort, resulted in a sensitivity and specificity of 92% and 63%, respectively. Secondary analyses revealed a strong association between IL-6 levels and acute rejection after multivariate adjustment for clinical characteristics (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study, the measurement of a single cytokine can exclude acute rejection with a sensitivity of 92% in renal transplant recipients presenting with acute graft dysfunction. Prospective studies are needed to determine the utility of this simple assay, particularly for low-risk or remote patients.

Monocyte-secreted inflammatory cytokines are associated with transplant glomerulopathy in renal allograft recipients.

BACKGROUND: Although there is ample evidence about the role of adaptive immunity in the development of chronic allograft dysfunction, little is known about the contribution of innate immunity to this process. Herein, we studied the relationship between inflammation, chronic biopsy scores, and anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) circulating alloantibodies in a cohort of 57 patients recruited at our center. METHODS: Available biopsies (n=27) were graded for chronic lesion scores according to Banff criteria. The production of cytokines by peripheral blood mononuclear cells after 48 hr of culture under resting conditions was quantified by Luminex. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α secretion assay and depletion studies were used to identify the source of these cytokines. RESULTS: There was a high correlation between the levels of interleukin (IL)-1ß, IL-6, and TNF-α (r>0.8, P<0.001 for all correlations). The levels of these cytokines were associated with transplant glomerulopathy (IL-1ß, P=0.019; IL-6, P=0.015; and TNF-α, P=0.006) but not with other chronic lesions or anti-HLA circulating alloantibodies. TNF-α was predominantly secreted by monocytes (percent of TNF-α secreting cells: 20.4±4.8 vs. 1.2±0.5 vs. 1.4±0.6 vs. 1.7±0.5 for CD14, CD4, CD8, and CD19 cells, respectively; all P<0.01 vs. CD14). The levels of all three proinflammatory cytokines were significantly reduced after monocyte depletion. Intriguingly, cytokine levels increased after ex vivo depletion of regulatory T cells (all P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, these data suggest that in vivo-activated monocytes in peripheral blood spontaneously secrete proinflammatory cytokines in renal allograft recipients with transplant glomerulopathy and seem to be under the regulation of functional regulatory T cells in this setting.

Evaluation of fluoroquinolones for the prevention of BK viremia after renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Nearly 30% of renal transplant recipients develops BK viremia, a prerequisite for BK nephropathy. Case reports have evaluated treatment options for BK virus, but no controlled studies have assessed prophylactic therapies. Fluoroquinolone antibiotics were studied for prevention of BK viremia after renal transplantation. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: This retrospective analysis evaluated adult renal transplant recipients with at least one BK viral load (blood) between 90 and 400 days after transplantation. Six to 12 months of co-trimoxazole was used for Pneumocystis prophylaxis. In sulfa-allergic/-intolerant patients, 6 to 12 months of atovaquone with 1 month of a fluoroquinolone was used. Fluoroquinolones can inhibit BK DNA topoisomerase. The two groups studied were those that received 30 days of levofloxacin or ciprofloxacin after transplantation and those that did not. The primary endpoint was BK viremia rates at 1 year. Of note, of the 160 patients not receiving fluoroquinolone prophylaxis, 40 received a fluoroquinolone for treatment of a bacterial infection within 3 months after transplantation. Subgroup analysis evaluating these 40 patients against the 120 who had no exposure to fluoroquinolones was completed. RESULTS: A 1-month fluoroquinolone course after transplantation was associated with significantly lower rates of BK viremia at 1 year compared with those with no fluoroquinolone. In the subgroup analysis, exposure to fluoroquinolone for treatment of bacterial infections within 3 months after transplantation was associated with significantly lower 1-year rates of BK viremia. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis demonstrates that fluoroquinolones are effective at preventing BK viremia after renal transplantation.