Benefits and barriers to return to education and relationship to quality of life for people living with spinal cord injury: Results of a mixed methods study.

CONTEXT: There is limited research on return to education (RTE) after spinal cord injury (SCI). As a result, few programs exist to help people achieve this goal. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective was to investigate the barriers and facilitators to RTE, and the relationship between RTE and quality of life (QOL). The secondary objective was to examine the role of a Vocational Resource Facilitation (VRF) program on RTE. METHODS: A mixed methods approach with a semi-structured interview and online survey was used. Participants included 15 people with SCI with RTE goals who received VRF services at an acute inpatient rehabilitation hospital. Qualitative responses on the barriers, facilitators and perceived benefits of RTE were analyzed using a grounded theory strategy. RESULTS: Barriers to RTE included physical and mental health, transportation, time, environmental barriers, finances, lack of knowledge about available resources, and discrimination. Facilitators to RTE included the VRF program, social support, financial support, virtual learning, organizational support, and policy constructs. People who RTE after SCI reported better QOL, less depressed mood than those who did not, and were more likely to have returned to work. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlighted common barriers and facilitators to RTE, and potential areas of intervention. VRF is a potentially efficacious early intervention vocational rehabilitation approach that improves participation in education and employment for people with SCI. People who received VRF and achieved RTE may have better QOL outcomes and improved employability.

Health impacts reported in the Spinal Cord Injury COVID-19 Pandemic Experience Survey (SCI-CPES).

CONTEXT: In people with spinal cord injury (SCI), infections are a leading cause of death, and there is a high prevalence of diabetes mellitus, obesity, and hypertension, which are all comorbidities associated with worse outcomes after COVID-19 infection. OBJECTIVE: To characterize self-reported health impacts of COVID-19 on people with SCI related to exposure to virus, diagnosis, symptoms, complications of infection, and vaccination. METHODS: The Spinal Cord Injury COVID-19 Pandemic Experience Survey (SCI-CPES) study was administered to ask people with SCI about their health and other experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS: 223 community-living people with SCI (male = 71%; age = 52±15 years [mean±SD]; paraplegia = 55%) completed the SCI-CPES. Comorbidities first identified in the general population as associated with poor outcomes after COVID-19 infection were commonly reported in this SCI sample: hypertension (30%) and diabetes (13%). 23.5% of respondents reported a known infection exposure from someone who visited (13.5%) or lived in their home (10%). During the study, which included a timeframe when testing was either unavailable or scarce, 61% of respondents were tested for COVID-19; 14% tested or were presumed positive. Fever, fatigue, and chills were the most common symptoms reported. Of the 152 respondents surveyed after COVID-19 vaccines became available, 82% reported being vaccinated. Race and age were significantly associated with positive vaccination status: most (78%) individuals who were vaccinated identified as Non-Hispanic White and were older than those who reported being unvaccinated (57±14 vs. 43±13 years, mean±SD). CONCLUSIONS: Self-reported COVID-19 symptoms were relatively uncommon and not severe in this sample of people with SCI. Potential confounders and limitations include responder, recruitment and self-reporting biases and changing pandemic conditions. Future studies on this topic should query social distancing and other behavioral strategies. Large retrospective chart review studies may provide additional data on incidence and prevalence of COVID-19 infections, symptoms, and severities in the SCI population.

Development of the Spinal Cord Injury COVID-19 Pandemic Experience Survey (SCI-CPES).

CONTEXT: Early during the COVID-19 pandemic, rehabilitation providers received reports from people with spinal cord injury (SCI) of considerable disruptions in caregiver services, medical and nursing care, and access to equipment and supplies; concomitantly, the medical community raised concerns related to the elevated risk of acquiring the infection due to SCI-specific medical conditions. Due to the novel nature of the pandemic, few tools existed to systematically investigate the outcomes and needs of people with SCI during this emergency. OBJECTIVE: To develop a multidimensional assessment tool for surveying the experience of the COVID-19 pandemic on physical and psychological health, employment, caregiving services, medical supplies and equipment, and the delivery of medical care for people with SCI. METHODS: The Spinal Cord Injury COVID-19 Pandemic Experience Survey (SCI-CPES) study, conducted between July 2020 through August 2021, surveyed people with SCI about their experiences during the early COVID-19 pandemic. The SCI-CPES was developed by a SCI care and research consortium using an iterative process. RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty-three people completed the survey. Most respondents resided in the consortium catchment area. As the survey progressed, online informed consent became available allowing dissemination of the SCI-CPES nationally. CONCLUSIONS: The consortium rapidly implemented the capture of experiences with COVID-19 pandemic directly from people with SCI, including survey creation, institutional approvals, distribution, online e-consenting, and data collection. In the future, the SCI-CPES is adaptable for use in other types of emergencies and disasters.

Clinical trial of home blood pressure monitoring following midodrine administration in hypotensive individuals with spinal cord injury.

BACKGROUND: Individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) above thoracic level-6 (T6) experience impaired descending cortical control of the autonomic nervous system which predisposes them to blood pressure (BP) instability, including includes hypotension, orthostatic hypotension (OH), and autonomic dysreflexia (AD). However, many individuals do not report symptoms of these BP disorders, and because there are few treatment options that have been proven safe and effective for use in the SCI population, most individuals remain untreated. OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of this investigation was to determine the effects of midodrine (10 mg) prescribed TID or BID in the home environment, compared to placebo, on 30-day BP, study withdrawals, and symptom reporting associated with OH and AD in hypotensive individuals with SCI. DESIGN/METHODS: Participants were randomly assigned to received midodrine/placebo or placebo/midodrine, with a 2-weeks washout period in between, and both the participants and investigators were blinded to randomization order. Study medication was taken 2 or 3 times/day, depending on their sleep/wake schedule, BP, and any related symptoms were recorded before and 1 h after each dosage and periodically throughout the day. RESULTS: Nineteen individuals with SCI were recruited; however, 9 withdrew prior to completion of the full protocol. A total of 1892 BP recordings (75 ± 48 recordings/participant/30-day period) were collected in the 19 participants over the two 30-day monitoring periods. Average 30-day systolic BP was significantly increased with midodrine compared to placebo (114 ± 14 vs. 96 ± 11 mmHg, respectively; P = 0.004), and midodrine significantly reduced the number of hypotensive BP recordings compared to placebo (38.7 ± 41.9 vs. 73.3 ± 40.6, respectively; P = 0.01). However, compared to placebo, midodrine increased fluctuations in BP, did not improve symptoms of OH, but did significantly worsen the intensity of symptoms associated with AD (P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Midodrine (10 mg) administered in the home environment effectively increases BP and reduces the incidence of hypotension; however these beneficial effects come at the expense of worsened BP instability and AD symptom intensity.

Effectiveness of Group Wheelchair Maintenance Training for People with Spinal Cord Injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of group wheelchair maintenance training and investigate participant characteristics associated with responsiveness to training. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial with an immediate group and a waitlist control group (WLCG) who received the intervention after a 6-month delay. SETTING: Four Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems Centers. PARTICIPANTS: Manual (MWC; n=80) and power wheelchair (PWC; n=67) users with spinal cord injury (N=147). INTERVENTIONS: Two 90-minute structured wheelchair maintenance training program classes with 12-20 people per class and separate classes for MWC and PWC users. Each class included in-person hands-on demonstrations and practice of wheelchair maintenance. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Separate analysis was completed for MWC and PWC users using the Wheelchair Maintenance Training Questionnaire (WMT-Q) capacity (ability to complete), performance (frequency of completion) and knowledge at baseline, 1 month, 6 months, 6 months pretraining (WLCG only), and 1 year (immediate only). RESULTS: After the intervention, participants in both the immediate and WLCG improved in maintenance capacity (MWC and PWC, P<.001) and performance (MWC and PWC, P<.001) with training. Only PWC users improved knowledge of wheelchair maintenance (P<.001). For both WLCGs (MWC and PWC), there was no difference between the 6-month pretraining time point and baseline. MWC users who responded to training had lower WMT-Q scores for all domains, whereas this was only the case for knowledge for PWC users. CONCLUSIONS: Group wheelchair skills training is effective at improving capacity to complete maintenance and performance of maintenance activities for MWC and PWC users, even in a cohort of experienced wheelchair users. For MWC users, improvements were tied to lower WMT-Q scores at baseline, whereas PWC users improved in capacity and performance independent of baseline score. Delivering this training in a structured group format has a lower cost, which might improve adoption into clinical practice.

Applying a Bookmarking Approach to Setting Clinically Relevant Interpretive Standards for the Spinal Cord Injury-Functional Index/Capacity Basic Mobility and Self-Care Item Bank Scores.

OBJECTIVES: To develop clinically relevant interpretive standards for the Spinal Cord Injury-Functional Index/Capacity (SCI-FI/C) Basic Mobility and Self-Care item bank scores. DESIGN: Modified "bookmarking" standard-setting methodology, including 2 stakeholder consensus meetings with individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) and SCI clinicians, respectively, and a final, combined (consumers and clinicians) "convergence" meeting. SETTING: Two SCI Model System centers in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Fourteen adults who work with individuals with traumatic SCI and 14 clinicians who work with individuals with SCI. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Placement of bookmarks between vignettes based on SCI-FI Basic Mobility and Self-Care T scores. Bookmarks were placed between vignettes representing "No Problems," "Mild Problems," "Moderate Problems," and "Severe Problems" for each item bank. RESULTS: Each consensus group resulted in a single set of scoring cut points for the SCI-FI/C Basic Mobility and Self-Care item banks. The cut points were similar but not identical between the consumer and clinician groups, necessitating a final convergence meeting. For SCI-FI/C Basic Mobility, the convergence group agreed on cut scores of 61.25 (no problems/mild problems), 51.25 (mild problems/moderate problems), and 41.25 (moderate problems/severe problems). For SCI-FI/C Self-Care, the convergence group agreed on cut scores of 56.25 (no/mild), 51.25 (mild/moderate), and 38.75 (moderate/severe). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study provide straightforward interpretive guidelines for SCI researchers and clinicians using the SCI-FI/C Basic Mobility and Self-Care instruments. These results are appropriate for the full bank, computer adaptive test, and short-form versions of the SCI-FI/C Basic Mobility and Self-Care item banks.

Using remote learning to teach clinicians manual wheelchair skills: a cohort study with pre- vs post-training comparisons.

PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that remote learning to teach clinicians manual wheelchair skills is efficacious. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A convenience sample of therapists (physical and occupational) and students were enrolled in pairs in a cohort study with pre- versus post-training comparisons. The intervention was a hybrid of self-study and hands-on practice paired with remote feedback for ten intermediate and advanced manual wheelchair skills. Participants practiced with self-selected frequency and duration, uploading a session log and video(s) to an online platform. A remote trainer provided asynchronous feedback prior to the next practice session. Capacity and confidence in completing the ten skills were evaluated using the Wheelchair Skills Test Questionnaire (WST-Q). Knowledge of wheelchair skills training and motor learning was assessed using a 62-item Knowledge Test. Secondary outcome measures included skill achievement, as confirmed by submitted video recordings, and participant feedback about the training. RESULTS: Across 41participants, scores were higher at follow-up compared to baseline for WST-Q capacity (73.9 ± 19.1 vs 16.8 ± 15.6, p < 0.001), WST-Q confidence (80.1 ± 12.2 vs 47.6 ± 18.2, p = 0.003) and knowledge (70.8 ± 7.5 vs 67.0 ± 5.4, p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Remote learning can increase wheelchair skills capacity and confidence as well as knowledge about such training and assessment. This model should be further investigated as a delivery method for training rehabilitation professionals. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01807728.Implications for rehabilitationWheelchair skills training is one of the 8 steps of wheelchair provision as outlined by the World Health Organization.Wheelchair skills are not a core part of most clinical curriculums and many clinicians cite a lack of resources and uncertainty on how to implement wheelchair skills training into practice as major barriers to providing such training.Remote learning offers the benefits of structured wheelchair skills training with expert feedback on an individual's own schedule that is not afforded by one-day "bootcamp"-type courses or on-the-job training, which are how many clinicians currently learn wheelchair skills.In a sample of physical and occupational therapists and students, remote learning was effective at increasing capacity and confidence to perform manual wheelchair skills as well as knowledge of wheelchair training.

Ultrasound-guided platelet-rich plasma injection for the treatment of recalcitrant rotator cuff disease in wheelchair users with spinal cord injury: A pilot study.

Context/Objective: Wheelchair users with spinal cord injury (SCI) have a high risk of developing shoulder pain, caused by rotator cuff disease. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is a potential treatment after conservative treatments fail and prior to surgical intervention; however, it has not been tested in wheelchair users who have recalcitrant shoulder pain associated with rotator cuff disease. The objective of this pilot project was to test the safety and potential treatment effect of an ultrasound-guided PRP injection for shoulder pain in the aforementioned population.Design: Prospective, quasi-experimental.Setting: Clinical research center.Participants: Six wheelchair users with SCI (3 paraplegia, 3 tetraplegia) who had chronic shoulder pain due to rotator cuff disease (presence of anterior shoulder pain, positive physical examination tests for rotator cuff disease, and tendinopathy demonstrated by ultrasound) and failed at least six months of conservative treatment.Interventions: Ultrasound-guided PRP injection into pathological shoulder tendons, targeting the supraspinatus. Subjects were provided a standardized stretching and strengthening program and were followed for 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks post-intervention with outcomes collected at each time-point.Outcome Measures: Wheelchair User's Shoulder Pain Index (WUSPI); pain Numerical Rating Scale (NRS); physical and ultrasound examinations for supraspinatus tendinopathy; 5-point patient global impression of change (PGIC).Results: WUSPI (69.9%, P < 0.001), NRS (49.6%, P < 0.01), and physical exam scores (35.7%, P < 0.01) decreased 24 weeks after treatment. Participants reported overall improvement in their status as a result of the treatment. No adverse events were noted, and no changes in ultrasound markers for tendinopathy were observed.Conclusion: A single, ultrasound-guided PRP injection into the supraspinatus tendon, followed by a stretching and strengthening exercise program, was safe and provided improvements in shoulder pain outcome measures in this sample for 24 weeks. Lack of blinding, short-term follow-up, and a suitable control group warrant a larger randomized controlled trial.Trial Registration: NCT01355549.

Characterizing the Experience of Spasticity after Spinal Cord Injury: A National Survey Project of the Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems Centers.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the qualities that individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) associate with their experience of spasticity and to describe the relationship between spasticity and perceived quality of life and the perceived value of spasticity management approaches. DESIGN: Online cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Multicenter collaboration among 6 Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems hospitals in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals with SCI (N=1076). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Qualities of Spasticity Questionnaire, modified Spinal Cord Injury-Spasticity Evaluation Tool (mSCI-SET), and the modified Patient-Reported Impact of Spasticity Measure (mPRISM). RESULTS: Respondents indicated that spasms most often occurred in response to movement-related triggering events. However, spontaneous spasms (ie, no triggering event) were also reported to be among the most common types. Frequency of spasms appears to decline with age. The highest frequency of spasms was reported by 56% of respondents aged <25 years and by only 28% of those >55 years. Stiffness associated with spasticity was reported to be more common than spasms (legs, 65% vs 54%; trunk, 33% vs 18%; arms, 26% vs 15%). Respondents reported negative effects of spasticity more commonly than positive effects. Based on their association with negative scores on the mSCI-SET and the mPRISM, the 5 most problematic experiences reported were stiffness all day, interference with sleep, painful spasms, perceived link between spasticity and pain, and intensification of pain before a spasm. Respondents indicated spasticity was improved more by stretching (48%) and exercise (45%) than by antispasmodics (38%). CONCLUSIONS: The experience of spasticity after SCI is complex and multidimensional, with consequences that affect mobility, sleep, comfort, and quality of life. Stiffness, rather than spasms, appears to be the most problematic characteristic of spasticity. Physical therapeutic interventions to treat spasticity warrant in-depth investigation.

Factors Influencing Incidence of Wheelchair Repairs and Consequences Among Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the frequency and consequences of wheelchair repairs, looking at the relationship to usage, components, out-of-pocket costs, number of days affecting the user, and factors associated with the need for repairs or consequences. DESIGN: Survey, cross-sectional. SETTING: Nine spinal cord injury (SCI) Model Systems centers. PARTICIPANTS: Wheelchair users with SCI (N=533). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cost and incidence of wheelchair repairs and consequences and wheelchair usage within the past 6 months. RESULTS: A total of 310 participants (56%) reported repairs, 127 (42%) of whom experienced at least 1 adverse consequence lasting a median of 5 days (interquartile range [IQR], 2-17.3 days). Repair rates were highest for the seating system, electronics, and tires. Participants were most often stranded at home or forced to use a backup chair. Median out-of-pocket costs were $150 (IQR, $50-$620). Active users, based on type of mobility and terrain, experienced more repairs and consequences than less active users. Repairs were more common among those who were Black (odds ratio [OR], 2.42) or power wheelchair (PWC) users (OR, 1.84), whereas consequences were more common among those who were Black (OR, 2.27), PWC (OR, 2.08) or power assist users (OR, 2.76), and those who had public insurance (OR, 1.70). CONCLUSIONS: Wheelchair repairs continue to affect more than 50% of wheelchair users with significant financial and personal cost. High repair rates limited participation inside and outside of the home. Consequences lasted longer than 2 weeks for many and may be minimized by a working backup chair. Disparities exist based on participant and wheelchair factors; repairs and adverse consequences appear to hit those most vulnerable with the least financial resources. Costs may be a barrier to repair completion for some individuals. This ongoing problem of high repair rates and their associated effects requires action such as higher standards, access to quicker service, and better training of users on wheelchair maintenance and repair.

Efficacy of a Remote Train-the-Trainer Model for Wheelchair Skills Training Administered by Clinicians: A Cohort Study With Pre- vs Posttraining Comparisons.

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypotheses that remote training improves trainer confidence and when these trainers train others the capacity and confidence of the trainees improves. DESIGN: Cohort study with pre- vs posttraining comparisons. SETTING: Four spinal cord injury model systems centers. PARTICIPANTS: Convenience sample of 7 clinician trainers and 19 able-bodied trainees (N=26). INTERVENTIONS: Part 1 focused on trainer skill acquisition with self-study of the Wheelchair Skills Program Manual and instructional videos focused on motor learning, spotting, and 10 intermediate and advanced wheelchair skills. Trainers practiced in pairs, receiving asynchronous feedback on video recordings from a remote instructor. Part 2 included additional video modules targeted at "how to" assess and train others in 4 wheelchair skills: gets over obstacle, ascends low curb, ascends high curb with caregiver assistance, and performs stationary wheelie. Upon completion, the trainers each provided 1:1 in-person training for 2-3 trainees. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Trainer confidence was assessed using the Self-Efficacy on Assessing, Training, and Spotting Test for Manual Wheelchairs. Trainee capacity ("Can you do it?") and confidence ("How confident are you?") were evaluated using the Wheelchair Skills Test Questionnaire (WST-Q). RESULTS: Trainer confidence increased for assessment (P=.003) and training (P=.002) but not spotting (P=.056). Trainee 4-item median (interquartile range) WST-Q scores significantly increased with training for capacity (13% [6-31] to 88% [75-88], P<.001) and confidence (13% [0-31] to 88% [81-100], P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Remote training improves trainers' confidence with respect to wheelchair skills testing and training and the wheelchair skills capacity and confidence of their trainees.

Pilot clinical trial of a clinical meditation and imagery intervention for chronic pain after spinal cord injury.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility and potential benefits of clinical meditation and imagery (CMI) for people with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI) and chronic pain. DESIGN: Pilot randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: Outpatients with SCI in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: 24 adults with chronic SCI (>1 year) and a >3 month history of pain rated ≥4/10 on average over the last week. INTERVENTIONS: 4-week program of once-weekly 2-hour group classes, offered in-person and online. CMI group participants were taught mindfulness, mantra meditation, and guided imagery practices. Control group participants received education on topics related to health and function after SCI. OUTCOME MEASURES: Pain interference (primary outcome), pain cognitions, pain intensity/unpleasantness, depressive symptomology, perceived stress. RESULTS: Pain interference decreased to a greater extent in the control group at both Day 42 and Day 70, with a large effect size (d > 1.0). Several secondary outcome measures showed changes consistent with more favorable outcomes in the CMI group at both Day 42 and Day 70, with a large effect size d > 0.80, including worst pain intensity over the last week, depressive symptomology, belief in pain as a sign of harm and perceived control over pain. Perceived stress improved to a greater extent in the control group (d = 1.16 at Day 42, d = .20 at Day 70). CONCLUSION: CMI is feasible and acceptable to implement with people with SCI and chronic pain. Further study is warranted to assess potential benefits for pain-related outcomes.

Effect of an interventional educational wheelchair program on medical students' understanding of manual wheelchair use.

BACKGROUND: There is limited literature exploring the benefits of interactive wheelchair educational programs in medical student curricula. OBJECTIVE: To identify the effect of an educational interactive wheelchair program on medical students' understanding of wheelchair use. Researchers hypothesized that the program would increase understanding. DESIGN: Repeated-measures survey study with postintervention comparison. SETTING: Inpatient acute rehabilitation center. PARTICIPANTS: Out of 123 eligible fourth-year medical students on a mandatory physical medicine and rehabilitation clerkship, 79 students participated. INTERVENTION: All participants underwent a 2-hour educational wheelchair program consisting of (1) a disability lecture; (2) a video on the importance of proper wheelchair type and fit, wheelchair prescription, as well as recreational wheelchair use; and (3) an interactive wheelchair experience. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pre- and postsurvey Likert scale questions measured medical students' understanding of four main areas: (1) impact of manual wheelchair use, (2) challenges of manual wheelchair use, (3) manual wheelchair skills, and (4) wheelchair etiquette. RESULTS: A two-tailed sign test demonstrated a highly significant increase from pre- to postsurvey scores in each survey section (P < .001). Presurvey and postsurvey mean scores for impact of manual wheelchair use, challenges of manual wheelchair use, manual wheelchair skills, and wheelchair etiquette survey sections were 3.9 and 4.4, 3.1 and 4.4, 2.4 and 4.4, and 2.5 and 4.0, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that an interactive educational wheelchair program effectively increases medical students' understanding of manual wheelchair use. The addition of an educational interactive wheelchair program to medical student curricula is recommended to improve medical students' understanding of manual wheelchair use and its impact on users.

A pilot study to evaluate micro-fragmented adipose tissue injection under ultrasound guidance for the treatment of refractory rotator cuff disease in wheelchair users with spinal cord injury.

CONTEXT/OBJECTIVES: Wheelchair users with chronic shoulder pain have few options after conservative treatments fail. This pilot study's purpose was to establish safety and treatment effects of micro-fragmented adipose tissue (MFAT) injections under ultrasound guidance for treatment of refractory shoulder pain caused by rotator cuff disease in wheelchair users with spinal cord injury (SCI) to prepare for a larger trial. DESIGN: Pilot clinical trial. SETTING: Rehabilitation hospital outpatient clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Ten wheelchair users with chronic SCI who had moderate-to-severe shoulder pain caused by refractory rotator cuff disease (diagnosed via ultrasound) for greater than 6 months. INTERVENTIONS: Ultrasound-guided injections of MFAT into the pathologic rotator cuff tendons and other abnormal shoulder structures (e.g. acromioclavicular and glenohumeral joints; subacromial bursa). OUTCOME MEASURES: 6- and 12-month changes in 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS); Wheelchair User's Shoulder Pain Index (WUSPI); Brief Pain Inventory pain interference items (BPI-I7); Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC); ultrasound and physical exams; and adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant adverse events throughout the study period. WUSPI, NRS, and BPI-I7 scores were significantly lower 6 and 12 months post-procedure (P < .05). Of those who remained in the trial, clinically meaningful changes (≥30% decrease) in WUSPI, NRS, and BPI-I7 scores were observed in 77.8%, 77.8%, and 66.7% of participants, respectively. All but one participant reported improvement in clinical status. MFAT injection under ultrasound guidance is potentially a safe and efficacious treatment for refractory shoulder pain caused by rotator cuff disease in wheelchair users with SCI. A larger, randomized controlled trial has been initiated.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03167138.

Increased pulse wave velocity in persons with spinal cord injury: the effect of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system.

Increased pulse wave velocity (PWV), a marker of cardiovascular disease (CVD), has been reported in otherwise healthy individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) compared with age-matched uninjured controls. Due to decentralized descending sympathetic vascular control, individuals with injuries above T6 are prone to orthostatic hypotension and, as a result, depend on the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) to maintain orthostatic blood pressure (BP). The purpose of this study was to determine resting PWV, a noninvasive surrogate of central arterial stiffness, in individuals with cervical (C4-T1; n = 11) and thoracic (T6-T12; n = 11) SCI, compared with age-matched controls (controls; n = 11). Next, our aim was to describe group differences in BP, plasma norepinephrine (NE), and renin response to head-up tilt (HUT). Finally, we sought to determine the relationship between PWV and the orthostatic change in BP, NE, and the plasma renin during HUT among the groups. PWV was significantly increased in both cervical (8.81 ± 1.91 m/s) and thoracic (7.36 ± 1.58 m/s) SCI compared with the controls (5.53 ± 0.95 m/s; P < 0.05). The change from supine to 60° HUT in BP and NE was significantly reduced and change in plasma renin was significantly increased in the cervical group compared with the thoracic and control groups. Group affiliation and change in plasma renin were significant predictors of PWV (R2 = 0.63, P = 0.001). These data suggest that dependency on the RAAS for orthostatic BP maintenance may be associated with increased PWV and risk of CVD in the SCI population.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Our novel findings suggest that increased arterial stiffness in individuals with SCI may be due to greater dependency on the RAAS to maintain hemodynamic stability during an orthostatic challenge. Asymptomatic orthostatic hypotension can occur in persons with SCI during transition from the supine to the seated position and during other upright activities of daily living; however, it is seldom addressed by clinicians.

A Primary Care Provider's Guide to Shoulder Pain After Spinal Cord Injury.

Shoulder pain is a common occurrence after spinal cord injury (SCI) and can have significant negative effects on health and function as many individuals with SCI are reliant on their upper extremities for mobility and self-care activities. Shoulder pain after SCI can be caused by acute injury or chronic pathology, but it is most often related to overuse injuries of the rotator cuff. Both acute strain and chronic overuse shoulder injuries in persons with SCI typically result from increased weight bearing on the upper extremities during transfers, weight-relief raises, and wheelchair propulsion, which are often performed in poor postural alignment owing to strength deficits. This article discusses management of patients with SCI who present with shoulder pain from the perspective of primary care physicians including evaluation and diagnostic procedures, interventions appropriate for both acute and chronic shoulder pain, and strategies for prevention.

The Neural Mechanisms Underlying Processing Speed Deficits in Individuals Who Have Sustained a Spinal Cord Injury: A Pilot Study.

Our objective was to determine differences in brain activation during a processing-speed task in individuals with SCI compared to a group of age-matched healthy controls and to a group of older healthy controls. Ten individuals with cervical SCI (C3-C5), 10 age-matched healthy controls and 10 older healthy controls participated in a cross-sectional study in which performance on neuropsychological tests of processing speed and brain activation were the main outcome measures. The brain areas used by the individuals with SCI during the processing-speed task differed significantly from the age-matched healthy controls, but were similar to the older control cohort, and included activation in frontal, parietal and hippocampal areas. This suggests that individuals with SCI may compensate for processing-speed deficits by relying on brain regions that classically support control cognitive processes such as executive control and memory.

30 Years After the Americans with Disabilities Act: Perspectives on Employment for Persons with Spinal Cord Injury.

The Americans with Disabilities Act, passed in 1990, represented landmark legislation and led to significant improvements in accessibility, such as prohibiting discrimination based on disability in public life, including employment. Now 30 years later, however, employment rates for persons with disabilities, including spinal cord injury, remain low. This article discusses why employment is so important for persons with spinal cord injury and challenges that remain. Presented are previously unpublished employment data from a nationally representative US sample. Finally, the state of the art of vocational rehabilitation, including models proven to facilitate this critical rehabilitation outcome, is discussed.

Double-blinded, placebo-controlled crossover trial to determine the effects of midodrine on blood pressure during cognitive testing in persons with SCI.

STUDY DESIGN: Clinical trial. OBJECTIVES: Individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) above T6 experience impaired descending cortical control of the autonomic nervous system, which predisposes them to hypotension. However, treatment of hypotension is uncommon in the SCI population because there are few safe and effective pharmacological options available. The primary aim of this investigation was to test the efficacy of a single dose of midodrine (10 mg), compared with placebo, to increase and normalize systolic blood pressure (SBP) between 110 and 120 mmHg during cognitive testing in hypotensive individuals with SCI. Secondary aims were to determine the effects of midodrine on cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFv) and global cognitive function. SETTING: United States clinical research laboratory. METHODS: Forty-one healthy hypotensive individuals with chronic (≥1-year post injury) SCI participated in this 2-day study. Seated SBP, CBFv, and cognitive performance were monitored before and after administration of identical encapsulated tablets, containing either midodrine or placebo. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, midodrine increased SBP (4 ± 13 vs. 18 ± 24 mmHg, respectively; p < 0.05); however, responses varied widely with midodrine (-15.7 to +68.6 mmHg). Further, the proportion of SBP recordings within the normotensive range did not improve during cognitive testing with midodrine compared with placebo. Although higher SBP was associated with higher CBFv (p = 0.02), global cognitive function was not improved with midodrine. CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate that midodrine increases SBP and may be beneficial in some hypotensive patients with SCI; however, large heterogeneity of responses to midodrine suggests careful monitoring of patients following administration. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT02307565.

Taking the Next Steps in Regenerative Rehabilitation: Establishment of a New Interdisciplinary Field.

The growing field of regenerative rehabilitation has great potential to improve clinical outcomes for individuals with disabilities. However, the science to elucidate the specific biological underpinnings of regenerative rehabilitation-based approaches is still in its infancy and critical questions regarding clinical translation and implementation still exist. In a recent roundtable discussion from International Consortium for Regenerative Rehabilitation stakeholders, key challenges to progress in the field were identified. The goal of this article is to summarize those discussions and to initiate a broader discussion among clinicians and scientists across the fields of regenerative medicine and rehabilitation science to ultimately progress regenerative rehabilitation from an emerging field to an established interdisciplinary one. Strategies and case studies from consortium institutions-including interdisciplinary research centers, formalized courses, degree programs, international symposia, and collaborative grants-are presented. We propose that these strategic directions have the potential to engage and train clinical practitioners and basic scientists, transform clinical practice, and, ultimately, optimize patient outcomes.