A Mother in Jeopardy: The Ethics of Pregnancy and Chemotherapy.

JM is a 32-year-old primagravida with polycystic ovary disease. She had extreme difficulty conceiving and was started on clomiphene 6 months ago by her fertility specialist. After doubling the dose on the sixth cycle, she successfully became pregnant. On her second prenatal visit at 12 weeks gestation, an ovarian cyst was detected. Ultrasound showed a complex ovarian mass with nodules on the bowel and abdominal wall. There was mild-to-moderate peritoneal fluid. Cytology showed adenocarcinoma of ovarian origin. Further workup demonstrated advanced stage III epithelial ovarian cancer. JM was referred to GYN-oncology who felt pregnancy-sparing debulking was not an option. The oncologist recommended termination of pregnancy due to the risks of delaying chemotherapy. JM refused, citing her fertility difficulties in the past and her desire to carry the pregnancy to term "even if it kills me." She tells the oncologist she cannot bear the thought of terminating her pregnancy under any circumstances. The oncologist wants to comply with her wishes but feels the patient is making a choice that would result in harm to herself. The oncology team requests an ethics consult.

Death or Damnation: Surrogacy and Religious Beliefs.

MC is a 42-year-old female who was in a motor vehicle accident and suffered multiple contusions as well as a fracture of the left femur, pelvic ramus, and left orbit. Due to contusion of the brain, MC has been comatose for over a week and is on mechanical ventilation to protect her airway. There is no written declaration of surrogacy. During the admission, surgery to repair the left femoral fracture was performed and was complicated by severe blood loss. Currently, MC's hematocrit is 24% with a hemoglobin of 7.4. The trauma team asserts that a blood transfusion would be in MC's best interests. Since MC lacks capacity for decision making, she cannot consent to blood transfusion. Her parents are Jehovah's Witnesses and refuse to approve blood transfusion, stating that it is against their faith. MC's brother, however, states that MC is not a practicing Jehovah's Witness and wants the medical team to provide the blood transfusion. The parents insist that decision making is their right; MC's brother feels he should be making decisions. The trauma teams calls for an emergency consultation with the hospital ethics committee.