Safety and Efficacy of Tranexamic Acid in Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Tranexamic acid (TXA) has gained popularity in spinal surgery because of its potential to reduce blood loss. However, concerns regarding its safety and efficacy remain. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of TXA in reducing blood loss and its safety profile in spinal surgeries. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in electronic databases for randomized controlled trials and prospective studies evaluating the use of TXA in spinal surgery. The primary outcomes were intraoperative and total estimated blood loss (EBL), and the secondary outcomes included the incidence and types of complications associated with TXA use. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models. Results: Thirteen studies involving 1,213 participants were included in the meta-analysis. The use of TXA was associated with significant reductions in both intraoperative (mean difference: -46.56 mL [-73.85, -19.26], p<0.01]) and total EBL (mean difference: -210.17 mL [-284.93, -135.40], p<0.01) while also decreasing the need for blood transfusions (risk ratio: 0.68 [0.51, 0.90], p<0.01). No significant difference was found in the incidence and types of thrombotic complications when TXA was used in spinal surgery. Subgroup analysis showed consistent results in instrumentation and fusion surgery and different doses of TXA. Conclusions: TXA is effective in reducing intraoperative and overall blood loss in spinal surgery without increasing the risk of complications. These findings support the use of TXA to improve patient outcomes. However, caution should be exercised because of the heterogeneity among the included studies. Further research is needed to confirm these findings and explore potential long-term complications.

Satisfaction following correction of spinal deformity: Cultural and regional effects on outcome.

Corrective spine surgery for spinal deformities, such as adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and adult spinal deformity (ASD), aims to enhance the quality of life by addressing physical impairments. However, the extent of patient satisfaction after surgery, which includes pain management, functional recovery, and psychological contentment, exhibits considerable variation across different cultural and geographical landscapes. This review describes the influence of cultural and regional disparities on postoperative satisfaction in AIS and ASD surgery with a particular emphasis on the disparities between the US and Japan. This review underscores the intricate relationship between surgical outcomes and patient-reported satisfaction metrics. The investigation reveals significant contrasts in patient satisfaction and clinical results between these 2 countries, attributed to divergent cultural expectations, lifestyle adaptations, and perceptions of bodily image. These distinctions are crucial for healthcare professionals to recognize, as they necessitate a culturally nuanced approach to patient care. This comparative review not only enhances the understanding of patient experiences across cultures but also provides valuable guidance for physicians in customizing their strategies to align with the varied expectations of their patients, thereby improving postoperative satisfaction and overall quality of life. This review emphasizes the necessity of a tailored and culturally sensitive approach to managing spinal deformities, underscoring the need to factor in cultural and regional elements to enhance patient satisfaction and surgical outcomes.

Proximal Junctional Failure in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: An In-depth Review.

Adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery aims to correct abnormal spinal curvature in adults, leading to improved functionality and reduced pain. However, this surgery is associated with various complications, one of which is proximal junctional failure (PJF). PJF can have a significant impact on a patient's quality of life, necessitating a comprehensive understanding of its causes and the development of effective management strategies. This review aims to provide an in-depth understanding of PJF in ASD surgery. PJF is a complex complication resulting from a multitude of factors including patient characteristics, surgical techniques, and postoperative management. Age, osteoporosis, overcorrection of sagittal alignment, and poor bone quality are identified as significant risk factors. The clinical implications of PJF are substantial, often requiring revision surgery and causing a considerable decrease in patients' quality of life. Prevention strategies include careful preoperative planning, appropriate patient selection, and optimization of surgical techniques. Treatment often necessitates a multifaceted approach, including surgical intervention and the management of underlying risk factors. Predictive modeling is an emerging field that may offer a promising avenue for the risk stratification of patients and individualized preventive strategies. A thorough understanding of PJF's pathogenesis, risk factors, and clinical implications is essential for surgeons involved in ASD surgery. Current preventive measures and treatment strategies aim to mitigate the risk and manage the complications of PJF, but the complication cannot be entirely prevented. Future research should focus on the development of more effective preventive and treatment strategies, and predictive models could be valuable in this pursuit.

Revolutionizing Spinal Care: Current Applications and Future Directions of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning.

Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are rapidly becoming integral components of modern healthcare, offering new avenues for diagnosis, treatment, and outcome prediction. This review explores their current applications and potential future in the field of spinal care. From enhancing imaging techniques to predicting patient outcomes, AI and ML are revolutionizing the way we approach spinal diseases. AI and ML have significantly improved spinal imaging by augmenting detection and classification capabilities, thereby boosting diagnostic accuracy. Predictive models have also been developed to guide treatment plans and foresee patient outcomes, driving a shift towards more personalized care. Looking towards the future, we envision AI and ML further ingraining themselves in spinal care with the development of algorithms capable of deciphering complex spinal pathologies to aid decision making. Despite the promise these technologies hold, their integration into clinical practice is not without challenges. Data quality, integration hurdles, data security, and ethical considerations are some of the key areas that need to be addressed for their successful and responsible implementation. In conclusion, AI and ML represent potent tools for transforming spinal care. Thoughtful and balanced integration of these technologies, guided by ethical considerations, can lead to significant advancements, ushering in an era of more personalized, effective, and efficient healthcare.

Clinical Results after Release of Sternocleidomastoid Muscle Surgery for Neglected Congenital Muscular Torticollis-Unipolar vs. Bipolar Release Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Although the surgical release of the sternocleidomastoid muscle (SCM) is required for residual congenital muscular torticollis (CMT), the surgical outcomes between bipolar and unipolar SCM release remained unclear. The purpose of the present study was to assess surgical outcomes after bipolar and unipolar release of SCM in adolescent/adult patients with neglected CMT. METHODS: Twenty-one consecutive adolescent/adult patients with neglected CMT who underwent surgical treatment were enrolled. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were evaluated at preoperative and final follow-up. RESULTS: The bipolar release of SCM was performed in 3 patients (B group; males, n = 1, females, n = 2) and the unipolar release of SCM in 18 patients (U group; males, n = 6, females, n = 12). The mean age at surgery was 40.0 ± 17.0 years in Group B, and that was 32.3 ± 13.1 years in Group U (p = 0.47). The mean follow-up period was 16.0 ± 5.7 months in Group B and 10.4 ± 7.6 months in Group U (p = 0.22). Cervicomandibular angle correction rates were comparable at 75.4 ± 2.4% for the B group and 73.1 ± 11.7% for the U group (p = 0.62). There was no significant difference in clinical outcome according to the modified Cheng and Tang score between the two groups (p = 0.89). No major complications arose, although one patient exhibited a transient neurological deficit of the greater auricular nerve, and one patient developed a hematoma in the B group. CONCLUSIONS: The unipolar SCM release appeared to be a non-inferiority and less invasive procedure, minimizing surgical scars and avoiding potential auricular nerve damage in adolescent/adult patients with neglected CMT.

Translucent Zone Between Autograft and Endplate Two Months Postoperatively Is an Independent Predictor of Delayed Osseous Union in Elderly Patients With Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery.

Background Delayed union or pseudoarthrosis after posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) is associated with poor outcomes in health-related quality of life. Therefore, it is important to achieve earlier solid fusion for a successful clinical outcome after PLIF. A few authors reported that biomechanical factors may influence spinal fusion rates. The purpose of our retrospective study was to evaluate the independent predictors of delayed osseous union related to intraoperative procedures of PLIF, and to find ways to reduce delayed osseous union. Methods This was a retrospective study of a completed trial. We reviewed 66 elderly patients with osteoporosis after PLIF (all female, mean age 71 years, follow-up period over 6 months). Lumbar computed tomography scans at 2 months postoperatively were examined for the presence of a translucent zone between autograft and endplate (more than 50% of vertebral diameter), and autograft position with bone bridging (anterior, central, or posterior). Osseous union was assessed by using computed tomography 6 months postoperatively. Results Thirty-three patients (50%) showed complete osseous union, while 33 did not. A translucent zone between autograft and endplate two months postoperatively was observed in nine patients (27%) in the union group and in 23 (70%) in the nonunion group (p<0.01). Autograft position with bone bridging two months postoperatively was anterior, central, and posterior in 17 (52%), 30 (91%), and 20 patients (61%) in the union group, and in 12 (36%), 20 (61%), and seven patients (21%) in the nonunion group (p=0.22, p<0.01, and p<0.01), respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the presence of a translucent zone between autograft and endplate (odds ratio, 0.101; 95% confidence interval: 0.026-0.398; p<0.01) and teriparatide administration (odds ratio, 8.810; 95% confidence interval: 2.222-34.936; p<0.01) were independently associated with osseous union after PLIF. Conclusions A translucent zone between autograft and endplate at two months postoperatively independently predicted delayed osseous union within six months after PLIF. Complete osseous union rates were higher in patients with posterior bone bridging two months postoperatively than in those without. These findings apart from preoperative predictors of osseous union might serve as indicators of how intraoperative techniques affects osseous union enhancement.

Comparative Study of S2-Alar-Iliac Screw Trajectories between Males and Females Using Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Analysis: The True Lateral Angulation of the S2-Alar-Iliac Screw in the Axial Plane.

The S2 alar-iliac screw (S2AIS) is commonly used for long spinal fusion as a rigid distal foundation in spinal deformity surgeries, and it is also used in percutaneous sacropelvic fixation for providing an in-line connection to the proximal spinal constructs without using offset connectors. Although the pelvic shape is different between males and females, reports on S2AIS trajectories according to gender have been scarce in the literature. In this paper, S2AIS trajectories are compared between males and females using pelvic three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) in a normal Japanese population. After resetting the caudal angulation in CT-imaging plane manipulation, the angulation of S2AIS was more lateral in the axial plane and more horizontal in the coronal plane in females. Mean distances from the midline to starting points of S2AIS tended to be shorter in females, whereas mean distances from the midline to the posterior superior iliac spine was significantly longer in females. We also found that there were positive correlations between the patients' height and the maximal lengths of S2AISs, and the patients' height and minimal areas of S2AIS pathways. Our results are useful not only for conventional open spinal surgery, but also for minimally invasive spine surgery.

Impact of Early Intervertebral Osseous Union After Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion on Health-Related Quality of Life.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: Nonunion after posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) is associated with poor improvements in health-related quality of life (HRQOL). We aimed to investigate the influence of early osseous union after PLIF on HRQOL. METHODS: We reviewed 138 patients with 1-level PLIF (mean age 67 years, follow-up period ≥1 year). Postoperative lumbar computed tomography was performed to assess screw loosening and intervertebral union. HRQOL was assessed using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients (28%) showed complete union at 6 months postoperatively (early union group). Twenty-eight patients (20%) showed complete union at 6 to 12 months postoperatively (delayed union group), while 71 patients demonstrated noncomplete union. Effective improvement of lumbar spine dysfunction and psychological disorders was achieved in 19 (63.3%) and 17 (50.0%) patients in the early union group, in 9 (42.9%) and 14 (53.8%) patients in the delayed union group, and in 22 (34.9%) and 19 (29.2%) patients in the nonunion group, respectively (P = .036 and P = .036, respectively). The nonunion group had a significantly higher proportion of cases with screw loosening at 6 and 12 months postoperatively than the complete union group (P = .033 and P = .022). CONCLUSIONS: Lumbar spine dysfunction and psychological disorders improved in cases with early complete union compared to those with nonunion. Screw loosening occurred in cases with nonunion predominantly from 6 months postoperatively. Therefore, the achievement of early complete union might be helpful for better HRQOL and lower incidence of postoperative complications.

Unilateral C1 Posterior Arch Screw-C2 Laminar Screw Posterior Fixation for Vertebral Artery Preservation in Bow Hunter's Syndrome.

Pedicle or lateral mass screws, which are usually used to fix atlantoaxial instability, increase the risk of vertebral artery (VA) injury in patients with bone or arterial anomalies or osteoporotic bone. Here, we report the use of a unilateral C1 posterior arch screw-C2 laminar screw posterior fixation with a contralateral C1 lateral mass screw for VA preservation in a patient with bow hunter's syndrome (BHS). A 65-year-old male presented with recurrent loss of consciousness in the right rotational and backward-bending head positions for 1 year. Cerebral angiography in the same head position showed that the left VA was disrupted at C1/2 and the right VA was hypoplastic. The patient was diagnosed with BHS. C1-2 posterior fixation and iliac bone grafting were performed. The left VA was on the dominant side, and the VA was in a high position; thus, a C1 posterior arch screw was selected for the left side, a C1 lateral mass screw was selected for the right side, and a C2 laminar screw with O-arm navigation and a C-arm was used to prevent arterial injury. Intraoperative findings revealed no VA injury, and postoperative computed tomography showed the screw at the planned site. In a patient with BHS, posterior fixation with a unilateral C1 posterior arch screw-C2 laminar screw prevented VA injury because the screw could be inserted while avoiding the VA.

Preliminary Clinical Outcome of One-level Mobi-C Total Disc Replacement in Japanese Population.

INTRODUCTION: In 2018, the first Mobi-CⓇ total disk replacement (TDR) case was performed in Japan. In this study, we examined the preliminary clinical outcome of Mobi-CⓇ for degenerative cervical spine disease. METHODS: We examined 24 consecutive patients who underwent 1-level TDR after 2018 and followed up for more than 6 months after surgery. The evaluation criteria included age, gender, diagnosis, follow-up period, surgical level, implant size, surgery time, intraoperative bleeding volume, complications, revision surgery, imaging findings, JOA score, and various questionnaires. RESULTS: The mean age was 52.7 years, 13 males and 11 females. There were 15 cases of cervical disk herniation and 9 cases of cervical spondylosis. The mean follow-up period was 17.4 months. Surgical levels were C3/4 in 4 cases, C4/5 in 2 cases, C5/6 in 16 cases, and C6/7 in 2 cases. The mean operation time was 138.5 minutes, the amount of intraoperative bleeding was 32.1 ml, and there were no serious intraoperative complications. The range of motion of the affected level increased significantly, from 6.6 degrees preoperatively to 12.2 degrees at final follow-up. No patients required revision surgery at final follow-up, and there were no cases of heterotopic ossification or adjacent segment disease. One patient exhibited radiculopathy due to mild subsidence 1 year after surgery, and 1 had asymptomatic contact of device plates. Preoperative and final JOA scores improved from 11.7 to 15.8 points, and NRS improved from 4.3 to 1.3 points for neck pain and 4.3 to 1.7 points for arm pain. Preoperative and final NDI improved from 39.7% to 14.0%, and EQ-5D improved from 0.602 to 0.801. CONCLUSIONS: The short-term treatment outcomes of Mobi-CⓇ TDR were generally favorable. Spine surgeons should comply with guidelines when introducing this procedure and strive to adopt this new technology in Japan.

Idiopathic dorsal spinal cord herniation perforating the lamina: a case report and review of the literature.

Spinal cord herniation (SCH) is a rare condition associated with tethering of the spinal cord at the ventral dural defect. Idiopathic dorsal spinal cord herniation (IDSCH) is an extremely rare clinical entity. Here, we report the first case of IDSCH perforating the lamina in a patient with a history of ossification of the ligamentum flavum and diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis. Untethering of the spinal cord was performed by removing the surrounded ossified dura. Although urological symptoms and impaired proprioception remained, progressive neurological deterioration was prevented. Because this disease condition is extremely rare, it should be differentiated from ventral SCH.

Utility of a Computer-assisted Rod Bending System to Avoid Pull-out and Loosening of Percutaneous Pedicle Screws.

STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective observational study of a cohort of consecutive patients. OBJECTIVE: To compare the influence of (1) manual and (2) computer-assisted (CA) rod bending techniques on pedicle screw pull-out resulting in loosening during rod reduction and final tightening. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Our recent study showed screw pull-out during rod reduction might be a risk factor for loosening of percutaneous pedicle screws (PPSs) postoperatively, resulting in worse postoperative back pain. We retrospectively analyzed data from 53 consecutive patients who underwent minimally invasive lumbar or thoracic spinal stabilization using intraoperative computed tomography image (CT)-guided navigation with conventional manual rod bending or CA rod bending and were followed up for 1 year. METHOD: Screw pull-out length was measured on axial CT images obtained immediately after screw insertion and postoperatively. Loosening of screws and clinical outcome were evaluated radiographically, clinically, and by CT 1 year after surgery. The frequencies of screw pull-out and screw loosening between the 2 rod bending techniques were compared. Lumbar pain-related factors for both groups of patients were determined preoperatively and 1 year after surgery. RESULTS: Overall, 360 pedicle screws were placed in the manual group and 124 pedicle screws were placed in the CA group. There was no significant difference in the mean age, sex, bone mineral density, mean stabilized length, or smoking habits of patients between the groups. The diameters, lengths, and trajectory angle (axial and sagittal) of the screws placed were not significantly different between the groups. Screw pull-out rate/length and loosening in the CA group was significantly lower than that in the manual group. Postoperative low back pain improved significantly in the CA group compared with that in the manual group. CONCLUSION: CA bending is useful to avoid PPS pull-out during rod reduction and screw loosening postoperatively. CA bending is useful to avoid PPS pull-out during rod reduction and screw loosening postoperatively. This result might have been a factor leading to reduced postoperative back pain in the CA group, however, that future studies are need to investigate this association.

Impact of sufficient contact between the autograft and endplate soon after surgery to prevent nonunion at 12 months following posterior lumbar interbody fusion.

OBJECTIVE: Nonunion after posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) is associated with poor long-term outcomes in terms of health-related quality of life. Biomechanical factors in the fusion segment may influence spinal fusion rates. There are no reports on the relationship between intervertebral union and the absorption of autografts or vertebral endplates. Therefore, the purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the risk factors of nonunion after PLIF and identify preventive measures. METHODS: The authors analyzed 138 patients who underwent 1-level PLIF between 2016 and 2018 (75 males, 63 females; mean age 67 years; minimum follow-up period 12 months). Lumbar CT images obtained soon after the surgery and at 6 and 12 months of follow-up were examined for the mean total occupancy rate of the autograft, presence of a translucent zone between the autograft and endplate (more than 50% of vertebral diameter), cage subsidence, and screw loosening. Complete intervertebral union was defined as the presence of both upper and lower complete fusion in the center cage regions on coronal and sagittal CT slices at 12 months postoperatively. Patients were classified into either union or nonunion groups. RESULTS: Complete union after PLIF was observed in 62 patients (45%), while nonunion was observed in 76 patients (55%). The mean total occupancy rate of the autograft immediately after the surgery was higher in the union group than in the nonunion group (59% vs 53%; p = 0.046). At 12 months postoperatively, the total occupancy rate of the autograft had decreased by 5.4% in the union group and by 11.9% in the nonunion group (p = 0.020). A translucent zone between the autograft and endplate immediately after the surgery was observed in 14 and 38 patients (23% and 50%) in the union and nonunion groups, respectively (p = 0.001). The nonunion group had a significantly higher proportion of cases with cage subsidence and screw loosening at 12 months postoperatively in comparison to the union group (p = 0.010 and p = 0.009, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: A lower occupancy rate of the autograft and the presence of a translucent zone between the autograft and endplate immediately after the surgery were associated with nonunion at 12 months after PLIF. It may be important to achieve sufficient contact between the autograft and endplate intraoperatively for osseous union enhancement and to avoid excessive absorption of the autograft. The achievement of complete intervertebral union may decrease the incidence of cage subsidence or screw loosening.

Key Radiographic Parameters That Influence the Improvement of Postoperative Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Patients Treated Surgically for Adult Spinal Deformity With a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. OBJECTIVE: The study objectives were to: (1) determine radiographically which spinal malalignment parameters predominantly influence the risk of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD); (2) evaluate the outcome of GERD 2 years after surgery for adult spinal deformity (ASD); and (3) clarify key factors that influence the improvement of postoperative GERD in ASD. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Spinal deformity is reported to be involved in the pathology of GERD. Our previous study found that approximately 50% of patients treated surgically for ASD had GERD symptoms. However, the postoperative progress of GERD and the key factors that influence the improvement of postoperative GERD are largely unknown. METHODS: Ninety-two patients with ASD treated with thoracolumbar corrective surgery and followed up for a minimum of 2 years were enrolled. All patients were asked to complete the Frequency Scale for Symptoms of GERD (FSSG) questionnaire preoperatively and at 1 and 2 years after surgery. GERD was diagnosed by FSSG score more than 8 points. Before, and at 1 and 2 years after surgery, full-length lateral radiographs were taken and radiographic parameters were obtained. RESULTS: Patients were classified into two groups based on GERD symptoms, with 47 (51.1%) in the GERD+ group. Among parameters assessed, only thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK) was significantly greater in the GERD+ group than in the GERD- group. The FSSG score improved significantly 1 year after surgery, but no significant difference was found between groups at 2 years. A significant correction loss of TLK was observed 2 years after surgery. There was a significant highly positive correlation between the FSSG score and TLK at 2 years after surgery. CONCLUSION: GERD improved with correction of the spinal deformity but significant correction loss of the TLK even within the fusion presumably due to subsidence or proximal junctional kyphosis resulted in a cessation of that improvement over time. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Selecting the C7-LIV Line Vertebra as the Upper Instrumented Vertebra for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Lenke Type 1A Curves: Multicenter and a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up Study.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective multicenter cohort study. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated a new upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) selection method that used the modified Shinshu line (MSL) to establish the selected UIV as the MSL vertebra (MSLV). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: No reports have addressed optimal UIV selection according to the lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) for good trunk balance in Lenke 1A curves. METHODS: Forty-five consecutive patients (44 female, 14.4 ±â€Š2.4 yrs) receiving posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for a Lenke 1A adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) curve were analyzed. We defined the novel MSL as the line between the center of the spinous process of C7 and that of the spinous process of the LIV. The vertebral body with which the MSL first contacted proximally was defined as the MSLV. The groups in which the UIV was at, proximal to, or distal to the MSLV were defined as the matched group (M-group; 15 cases [15 female], 14.7 ±â€Š2.1 yrs), proximal group (P-group; 20 cases, [19 female], 15.0 ±â€Š2.2 yrs), and distal group (D-group; 10 case [10 female], 14.8 ±â€Š2.5 yrs), respectively. We measured Cobb angle, main thoracic (MT) curve correction rate, and C7 plumb line absolute value (C7PL) at pre- and 2 years postoperatively for comparisons using Dunnett test, with the M-group as the control. RESULTS: In the M-group, P-group, and D-group, the Cobb angle correction rate between pre- and postoperative time points were 65.3 ±â€Š1.3%, 62.4 ±â€Š1.6%, and 52.8 ±â€Š6.8%, respectively, and comparable apart from a smaller correction tendency in the D-group versus the M-group (P = 0.08). At 2 years postoperatively, C7PL was 0.5 ±â€Š0.4, 1.0 ±â€Š0.6, and 1.3 ±â€Š0.9 cm, respectively, and significantly smaller for the M-group (both P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Better trunk balance were obtained without reducing correction rate by setting the novel MSLV as the UIV in PSF for Lenke type 1A curves. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Indications and limitations of minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion without osteotomy for adult spinal deformity.

PURPOSE: The global alignment and proportion (GAP) score was recently developed to consider proportional analysis of spinopelvic alignment and has been indicated for setting surgical goals to decrease the prevalence of mechanical complications. The goal of this study was to clarify the limitations and problems with spinal corrective surgery with minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) without osteotomy using GAP score, and to establish a preoperative radiographical evaluation to understand the necessity for three-column osteotomy. METHODS: We included data from 57 consecutive patients treated with spinal corrective surgery with LLIF and without Schwab grade 3-6 osteotomy for ASD. To evaluate flexibility of the pelvis and lumbar spine, we examined full-length lateral radiographs with patients standing and prone. Correlations between pre- and postoperative radiographic parameters and GAP score were determined. RESULTS: Most patients achieved a sufficiently ideal lumbar lordosis (87.7%), but ideal sacral slope (SS) was achieved in only 50.8% of patients. Preoperative prone SS showed a significant positive correlation with postoperative SS and a significant negative correlation with GAP score. Patients whose preoperative prone SS was larger than pelvic incidence × 0.59-7.5 tended to achieve proportioned spinopelvic alignment by using LLIF. CONCLUSIONS: The cause of poor outcome of GAP score for ASD corrective surgery with LLIF without osteotomy is a postoperative small SS. Preoperative prone SS is useful for predicting postoperative SS. When preoperative SS in prone patients is relatively small to ideal as calculated using PI, osteotomy or other correctors should be considered to achieve satisfactory spinopelvic parameters. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Weekly Teriparatide Versus Bisphosphonate for Bone Union During 6 Months After Multi-Level Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Osteoporotic Patients: A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Study.

STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter, prospective randomized study. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the impact of weekly teriparatide (WT) and bone contact (BC) status of grafted bone in patients recovering from multilevel lumbar interbody fusion (M-LIF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: WT has been reported to significantly improve bone fusion following posterior or transforaminal interbody fusion in osteoporosis patients. METHODS: Patients older than 50 years and osteoporotic were recruited. We defined the fusion of two or more consecutive intervertebral levels as M-LIF. All patients were instrumented with pedicle, iliac, or S-2 alar iliac screws after transplanting cages and autogenous bone between vertebral bodies. After surgical indication for M-LIF, the subjects were randomly allocated to receive either subcutaneous WT from 1 week to 6 months postoperatively (WT arm, N = 50) or a bisphosphonate (BP; BP arm, N = 54). Blinded radiological evaluations were performed using computed tomography (CT). Evaluation of bone fusion was performed at the intervertebral disc located at the bottom of the fixed range. The degree of bone fusion was calculated as a score from 2 to 6 points, with 2 defined as complete fusion. Bone fusion rate was also compared at 6 months postoperatively based on BC status of the grafted bone on CT immediately after surgery. RESULTS: Mean bone fusion score at 6 months postoperatively was 3.9 points in the WT group and 4.2 points in the BP group. The bone fusion rate at 6 months postoperatively tended to be higher in the WT group (46.8% vs. 32.7% in the BP group). The 6-month postoperative fusion rate of immediately postoperative of BC+ patients was significantly higher than that of BC- patients (47.4% vs. 9.5%). CONCLUSION: In M-LIF, there were no significant differences in bone fusion score between WT- and BP-treated patients. In contrast, BC status immediately postoperatively had a major impact on 6-month bone fusion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1.

Risk Factors and Assessment Using an Endoscopic Scoring System for Early and Persistent Dysphagia After Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion Surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study. OBJECTIVES: Preoperative and postoperative dysphagia was evaluated by an otolaryngology doctor and a speech-language-hearing therapist using the eating assessment tool (EAT-10) and Hyodo-Komagane scores. The objective was to achieve a more precise evaluation of the incidence and risk factors of early and persistent dysphagia after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although numerous reports have explored the risk factors for dysphagia after ACDF, these factors remain controversial. The main reason for this situation is that the methods for evaluating dysphagia are not adequate or uniform. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study involved a retrospective 47 consecutive patients who had undergone ACDF and been followed up for at least 1 year. Sagittal alignment of the cervical spine was evaluated by a preoperative x-ray. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine risk factors for transient or persistent dysphagia. RESULTS: The study showed that 34% of patients developed dysphagia in the early postoperative period and that 25.5% of patients still had persistent dysphagia 1 year postoperatively. 8.5% of patients had already developed dysphagia preoperatively, with a significant positive correlation observed between preoperative and postoperative dysphagia.Aging and smoking were significant risk factors for transient dysphagia. A preoperative cervical kyphotic angle at the C3/C4, C4/C5 disk-level and change in the kyphotic angle at C4/C5 during surgery were significant risk factors of persistent dysphagia 1 year after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to show dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery using the EAT-10 score and Hyodo-Komagane score with endoscopic evaluation. Aging and smoking were significant risk factors for transient dysphagia, while preoperative local kyphosis angles of C3-C4 and C4-C5 and change in the kyphotic angle at C4/C5 during surgery may be a key alignment of risk factors for postoperative persistent dysphagia. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level: III.

Predictors and Clinical Importance of Postoperative Coronal Malalignment After Surgery to Correct Adult Spinal Deformity.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective observational study of a cohort of consecutive patients. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the correlations between clinical outcomes of spinal surgery to correct adult spinal deformity (ASD) including mechanical complications and coronal malalignment and clarify the risk factors for postoperative coronal malalignment. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Despite the coronal malalignment seen regularly in adult patients who have undergone spinal surgery to correct spinal deformity, the associations between coronal malalignment, and clinical outcomes including mechanical complications after the surgery have remained unclear until now. To understand the associations between coronal malalignment and outcomes of surgery to correct ASD, and risk factors for postoperative coronal malalignment has substantial clinical importance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included data from 121 consecutive patients who had undergone spinal surgery to correct ASD and were followed up for a minimum of 2 years. Iliac screws were used for pelvic fixation in all cases. The coronal balance was defined as the horizontal distance between the midpoint of C7 and the center of the sacrum on the coronal plane, and coronal malalignment was defined as when the absolute coronal balance was >20 mm. Preoperative radiographic parameters, surgical features, and clinical outcomes including mechanical complications were compared between groups of patients with coronal balance and those with malalignment. Univariate and multivariate regression analysis were used to clarify risk factors for postoperative coronal malalignment. RESULTS: Postoperative coronal malalignment had no significant association with the clinical outcome as evaluated by a Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and Oswestry Disability Index but had a significant association with the frequency of rod fracture. A large preoperative coronal imbalance (malalignment), L5 coronal tilt angle, and use of lateral lumbar interbody fusion were found as risk factors for postoperative coronal malalignment. CONCLUSION: Postoperative coronal malalignment had no significant association with the clinical outcome as evaluated by the Oswestry Disability Index and Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire but was significantly associated with the frequency of rod fracture. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.