The Gluteus Deep Investing Fascia Compartment Block: A Novel Technique for Posterior Femoral Cutaneous Nerve Block.

Purpose: The posterior femoral cutaneous nerve (PFCN) block is used in regional anesthesia for lower extremity surgery. This study introduces a new ultrasound-guided technique called the "Gluteus-Deep Investing Fascia compartment Block (GDIF block)" for blocking the PFCN. This approach involves injecting local anesthetic into the potential space between the gluteus maximus muscle and the deep investing fascia, named the 'Gluteus Deep Investing Fascia Compartment'. The study discusses the anatomical and sonographic features crucial for identifying this compartment and explores the potential benefits of this approach for achieving effective PFCN block. Additionally, it examines the clinical application of the GDIF block for PFCN block as part of the Complete Lower Extremity Fascia Tri-compartment Block technique, named "CLEFT Block." This technique combines the suprainguinal fascia iliaca block with GDIF compartment block for PFCN and a sciatic nerve block as exclusive anesthesia technique. Patients and Methods: Nine patients with weapon-related lower limb injuries underwent surgery at district hospitals supported by the International Committee of the Red Cross. Between October and December 2023, seventeen above-knee procedures were performed for the nine patients using the GDIF block as part of a CLEFT block technique. Anesthesia was performed with a CLEFT block technique using a volume ratio of 1:1 of 1% lidocaine and 0.5% levobupivacaine. Results: The GDIF block technique for PFCN blockade was performed successfully in all patients without complications, achieving complete PFCN blockade. The CLEFT block technique proved effective as the sole anesthetic technique for seventeen above-knee procedures. All surgeries were completed successfully without additional pain medication or conversion to general anesthesia. Conclusion: The GDIF block appears to be a promising technique for anesthetic management, alone or as part of the CLEFT block. Further research with a larger patient population is necessary to validate these findings.

Functional recovery of wrist surgery with regional versus general anesthesia: a prospective observational study.

PURPOSE: Regional anesthesia may favour postoperative rehabilitation by inhibiting peripheral sensitization and secondary hyperalgesia. The literature on this subject is limited. In the present FUNCTION study, we sought to compare the functional recovery post orthopedic wrist surgery with regional versus general anesthesia. METHODS: We conducted a single-centre prospective observational cohort study in adult patients with a distal radial fracture. Functional recovery was assessed with validated psychometrics questionnaires (Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand [QuickDASH] and Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation [PRWE]), range of motion, and grip strength. We used a linear mixed regression model to assess the impact of the anesthesia technique on functional recovery. Postoperative pain and patient satisfaction were evaluated using a visual analog scale. RESULTS: We recruited 76 patients. At 12 weeks post surgery, there was no difference between the type of anesthesia and functional recovery with the QuickDASH (higher scores worse; regional anesthesia [RA], 22.7 vs general anesthesia [GA], 19.3; adjusted mean difference [aMD], -0.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], -9.6 to 9.0; P = 0.9) and PRWE (higher scores worse; RA group, 21.0 vs GA group, 20.5; aMD, -3.3; 95% CI, -12.1 to 5.6; P = 0.93) questionnaires. Range of motion, satisfaction, and postoperative pain were similar between groups. Right-hand grip strength was higher in the GA group. CONCLUSION: Regional anesthesia was not associated with improved functional recovery compared with general anesthesia. The dominance of the operated limb was a confusion factor in all evaluation modalities. Further research taking into account the dominance of the hand is necessary to establish the effects of regional anesthesia on functional recovery. STUDY REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04541745); registered 9 September 2020.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: L'anesthésie régionale pourrait favoriser la rééducation postopératoire en inhibant la sensibilisation périphérique et l'hyperalgésie secondaire. La littérature à ce sujet est limitée. Dans la présente étude nommée FUNCTION, nous avons cherché à comparer la récupération fonctionnelle après une chirurgie orthopédique du poignet réalisée sous anesthésie régionale vs sous anesthésie générale. MéTHODE: Nous avons réalisé une étude de cohorte observationnelle prospective monocentrique auprès de patient·es adultes présentant une fracture radiale distale. La récupération fonctionnelle a été évaluée à l'aide de questionnaires psychométriques validés (questionnaires QuickDASH [Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand] et PRWE [Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation]), de l'amplitude des mouvements et de la force de préhension. Nous avons utilisé un modèle de régression linéaire mixte pour évaluer l'impact de la technique d'anesthésie sur la récupération fonctionnelle. La douleur postopératoire et la satisfaction des patient·es ont été évaluées à l'aide d'une échelle visuelle analogique. RéSULTATS: Nous avons recruté 76 personnes. Douze semaines après la chirurgie, il n'y avait aucune différence entre le type d'anesthésie et la récupération fonctionnelle selon le questionnaire QuickDASH (scores plus élevés les pires; anesthésie régionale [AR], 22,7 vs anesthésie générale [AG], 19,3; différence moyenne ajustée [DMa], −0,3; intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95 %, −9,6 à 9,0; P = 0,9) et PRWE (scores plus élevés les pires; groupe AR, 21,0 vs groupe AG, 20,5; DMa, −3,3; IC 95 %, −12,1 à 5,6; P = 0,93). L'amplitude des mouvements, la satisfaction et la douleur postopératoire étaient similaires entre les groupes. La force de préhension de la main droite était plus élevée dans le groupe AG. CONCLUSION: L'anesthésie régionale n'a pas été associée à une amélioration de la récupération fonctionnelle par rapport à l'anesthésie générale. La prédominance du membre opéré était un facteur de confusion dans toutes les modalités d'évaluation. D'autres recherches tenant compte du côté dominant au niveau des mains sont nécessaires pour déterminer les effets de l'anesthésie régionale sur la récupération fonctionnelle. ENREGISTREMENT DE L'éTUDE: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04541745); enregistrée le 9 septembre 2020.

Functional recovery with peripheral nerve block versus general anesthesia for upper limb surgery: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Peripheral nerve block is a common anesthetic technique used during orthopedic upper limb surgery. Injection of local anesthetics around the target nerve inhibits the action of voltage-dependent sodium channels, inhibiting neurotransmission of pain impulses and providing motor immobility. Compared to general anesthesia, it could improve functional recovery by inhibiting nociceptive impulses and inflammation, thus reducing postoperative pain and immobilization and improving postoperative rehabilitation. This systematic review evaluates the impact of peripheral nerve block versus general anesthesia on postoperative functional recovery following orthopedic upper limb surgery. METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, CINHAL, EMBASE, and Scopus trial databases from inception until September 2021 for studies comparing peripheral nerve block to general anesthesia. We collected data on functional recovery, range of motion, patient satisfaction, quality of life, and return to work. We pooled studies using a random-effects model and summarized the quality of evidence with the GRADE approach. RESULTS: We assessed 373 citations and 19 full-text articles for eligibility, and included six studies. Six studies reported on functional recovery, but failed to detect a significant superiority of peripheral nerve block over general anesthesia (3 RCT studies, N = 160; SMD -0.15; CI at 95% -0.60-0.3; I2 = 45%; p = 0.07; low quality of evidence and 3 observational studies, N = 377; SMD -0.35; CI at 95% -0.71-0.01; I2 = 64%; p = 0.06; very low quality of evidence). CONCLUSIONS: Current literature is limited and fails to identify the benefit of peripheral nerve block on functional recovery. More studies are needed to assess the impact on long-term recovery. Considering the potential impact on clinical practice and training, a prospective study on functional recovery is ongoing (NCT04541745). TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO ID CRD42018116298. Registered on December 4, 2018.

Functional recovery with peripheral nerve block versus general anesthesia for upper limb surgery: a systematic review protocol.

BACKGROUND: Peripheral nerve block is a single injection that inhibits the transmission of peripheral nerve impulses to the central nervous system. The inhibition of the nociceptive impulse may decrease the occurrence of muscle spasm following mobilization postoperatively. This mechanism may contribute to a better functional recovery following upper limb surgery. This systematic review will investigate the impact of peripheral nerve block on functional recovery after an upper limb surgery. METHODS: We will search studies comparing peripheral nerve block to general anesthesia for upper limb surgery in the following databases: CENTRAL, MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL, EMBASE, and Scopus. In duplicate, independent reviewers will assess eligibility, evaluate risk of bias, and abstract data on type of peripheral nerve block and functional outcome. Where possible, we will pool results using a random effects model. For each outcome, we will assess the quality of evidence using GRADE methodology. DISCUSSION: We aim to summarize the available evidence comparing functional recovery with peripheral nerve block versus general anesthesia for upper limb surgery. These data will inform the design of a trial on the topic. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42018116298.

Retroclavicular vs Infraclavicular block for brachial plexus anesthesia: a multi-centric randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: The coracoid approach is a simple method to perform ultrasound-guided brachial plexus regional anesthesia (RA) but its simplicity is counterbalanced by a difficult needle visualization. We hypothesized that the retroclavicular (RCB) approach is not longer to perform when compared to the coracoid (ICB) approach, and improves needle visualization. METHODS: This randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial conducted in two hospitals, included patients undergoing distal upper limb surgery. Patients were randomly assigned to a brachial plexus block (ICB or RCB). The primary outcome was performance time (sum of visualization and needling time), and was analyzed with a non-inferiority test of averages. Depth of sensory and motor blockade, surgical success, total anesthesia time, needle visualization, number of needle passes and complications were also evaluated. Subgroup analysis restricted to patients with higher body mass index was completed. RESULTS: We included 109 patients between September 2016 and May 2017. Mean RCB performance time was 4.8 ± 2.0 min while ICB was 5.2 ± 2.3 min (p = 0.06) with a 95% CI reaching up to 5.8% longer. RCB conferred an ultrasound-needle angle closer to 0° and significantly improved needle visibility after the clavicle was cleared and before local anesthetic administration. No differences were found in the secondary outcomes. Similar results were found in the subgroup analysis. CONCLUSION: RCB approach for brachial plexus anesthesia was similar to ICB approach in terms of time performance. Needle visibility, which represent an important clinical variable, was superior and angle between needle and ultrasound probe was close to 0° in the RCB group. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02913625), registered 26 September 2016.

Hemodynamic responses to tracheal intubation with Bonfils compared to C-MAC videolaryngoscope: a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Direct laryngoscopy (DL) produce tachycardia and hypertension that could be fatal in a patient with a brain injury. Bonfils fiberscope and C-MAC videolaryngoscope are associated with little hemodynamic instability compared to DL. Scientific evidence comparing these two alternatives does not exist. We conducted this study to determine the hemodynamic effects of Bonfils compared to C-MAC in patients undergoing elective surgery. METHODS: Fifty (50) patients listed for elective surgery were randomly assigned to endotracheal intubation with Bonfils or C-MAC. After a standardized induction, intubation was done via the retromolar approach (Bonfils group) or via videolaryngoscopy (C-MAC group). A research assistant, who was not blinded to the intervention, recorded heart rate (HR) and arterial blood pressure (systolic, diastolic and mean arterial blood pressure [MAP]) at induction and at every minute during the 5 min post intubation. The primary outcome was the hemodynamic response to intubation, as verified every minute for the first 5 min compared to baseline value. RESULTS: After randomization, the two groups were comparable except for ASA I/II ratio which was slightly higher in the C-MAC group (p = 0.046). Heart rate (p = 0.40) and MAP (p = 0.30) were comparable between the two groups within 5 min post intubation. Intubation time was shorter with C-MAC than with Bonfils (30 ± 2 s vs 38 ± 2 s; p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Hemodynamic responses to tracheal intubation using the Bonfils fiberscope is comparable to the C-MAC videolaryngoscope among patients scheduled for an elective surgery. In light of these findings, using either technique appears to be a reasonable course of action. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN #34923 , retrospectively registered, 26/03/2018.

The Ultrasound-Guided Retroclavicular Block: A Prospective Feasibility Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this feasibility study was to determine the success rate (sensory and surgical) of the novel retroclavicular block and to thoroughly describe the technique. In addition, needle tip and shaft visibility, needling time, procedural discomfort, motor block success rate, patient satisfaction at 48-hour follow-up, and complications were also recorded. METHODS: Fifty patients scheduled for distal upper limb surgery received an in-plane, single-shot, ultrasound-guided retroclavicular block with 40 mL of mepivacaine 1.5% with epinephrine 2.5 µg/mL. Block success was defined as a sensory score of 10/10 for the 5 nerves supplying the distal upper limb at 30 minutes. Surgical success, needle visibility, needling time, axillary artery depth, motor block rate, patient discomfort with technique, satisfaction at 48 hours, and complications were also recorded. All blocks were video-recorded and timed for further independent assessment. A chest x-ray was obtained before discharge. RESULTS: Forty-five patients had a total sensory score of 10/10 at 30 minutes (90% success rate). Surgical success rate was 96%. Mean needling time was 3.77 minutes (25th-75th percentiles, 2.90-6.53 minutes) with a mean axillary artery depth of 3.1 ± 0.7 cm. Procedure-related discomfort (mean visual analog scale, 1.9 ± 1.2) was low. Mean 48-hour patient satisfaction rate (9.2 ± 1.1), mean needle tip (Likert scale, 3.0 ± 0.9), and shaft visibility (3.9 ± 0.9) were high. One vascular puncture and two transient paresthesias were recorded. No pneumothorax was revealed by chest x-ray. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the novel retroclavicular block offered a quick, safe, and reliable alternative for distal arm block. Further studies, comparing this approach with the classic infraclavicular block, are required to validate its efficacy, safety, and reliability.

Percentage, bacterial etiology and antibiotic susceptibility of acute respiratory infection and pneumonia among children in rural Senegal.

Acute respiratory infections (ARI) are still a major health problem in most developing countries. So far no study has evaluated the importance of childhood ARI in rural Senegal. We prospectively studied ARI, the percentage of pneumonia and related mortality, as well as the bacterial composition of nasopharyngeal flora using nasopharyngeal aspirates in 114 children, aged 2-59 months, presenting at Ndioum's pediatric ward. Excluded from the trial were those children that had had antimicrobial therapy in the previous 2 weeks. The Kirby-Bauer method was used to determine antibiotic resistance throughout the study. The percentage of ARI and pneumonia among the population tested was 24 per cent and 11 per cent respectively. Streptococcus pneumonia was often resistant to cotrimoxazole (31 per cent) but only 9 per cent were resistant to chloramphenicol and 14 per cent to penicillin. Haemophilus influenzae (HI) was uniformly sensitive to ampicillin, and only 4 per cent were resistant to chloramphenicol and 11 per cent to cotrimoxazole. We conclude that SP and HI resistance to cotrimoxazole is important and warrants larger clinical trials using chloramphenicol. Information campaigns and intense management of comorbidities are desirable in this type of population. Comorbidities (tuberculosis, malaria, HIV-AIDS, severe malnutrition) are determinant variables in many ARI cases and carry a high negative prognosis value.