Moving toward transdisciplinary approaches to addressing HIV and psychological trauma: Barriers and facilitators to building collaborations.

Most people living with HIV have experienced potentially traumatic events (e.g., physical assault, sexual assault, intimate partner violence) and, consequently, are at risk of trauma-related mental health difficulties, including posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Yet, research and clinical efforts related to HIV and psychological trauma remain siloed. Guided by the four-phase model of transdisciplinary research, the current study explored barriers and facilitators to transdisciplinary HIV/trauma clinical and research collaborations to address the overlap between HIV and psychological trauma. This exploration represents an initial step in the development and conceptualization of a transdisciplinary team known as Team REACH (Resiliency, Engagement, and Accessibility for Comorbid HIV/PTSD), which seeks to address the overlap between HIV and psychological trauma. Barriers and facilitators were explored through individual qualitative interviews with 21 research and clinical staff members across two clinics within an academic medical center (i.e., an infectious diseases clinic and a trauma-focused specialty mental health clinic). The findings revealed a number of barriers, including a lack of awareness, time and funding concerns, and a lack of clarity regarding services or the division of responsibility. The results also highlight perceived facilitators for collaborations, such as existing infrastructure and relationships, shared goals, leadership support, knowledge of other agency activities, and staff/team buy-in. Recommendations for increased collaboration included ongoing communication, needs assessment and goal development, access to partners, and role establishment. These findings will guide the next steps in further developing transdisciplinary collaboration goals and have implications for increasing collaborative approaches to patient care and targeting processes to enhance team effectiveness for transdisciplinary goals.

Development and feasibility testing of an integrated PTSD and adherence intervention cognitive processing therapy-life steps (CPT-L) to improve HIV outcomes: Trial protocol.

Despite high rates of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) in persons living with HIV (PLWH) and poor HIV-related health outcomes associated with PTSD, an effective evidence-based treatment for PTSD symptoms in PLWH does not exist. Negative reinforcement conceptual models posit that avoidant behavior (hallmark symptom of PTSD) demonstrated by PLWH with co-occurring PTSD can contribute to poor antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence. However, research evaluating the impact of evidence-based treatment for PTSD among HIV infected populations on HIV outcomes is scarce. The Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT) protocol is an evidence-based PTSD treatment that may address internalized stigma with targeted modifications and improve ART adherence and subsequent viral suppression through reduction of avoidant coping. This study will be the first pilot open-label randomized control trial (RCT) to test feasibility of an integrated evidence-based PTSD treatment (CPT) with an adherence intervention (Lifesteps) delivered in a Ryan White clinic to improve PTSD symptoms, adherence to ART, and retention in HIV care. Primary aims are to (1) conduct theater testing of the CPT and Lifesteps research protocol and evaluate acceptability (n = 12) and (2) deliver a modified CPT protocol (CPT-Lifesteps, or CPT-L) in 60 PLWH/PTSD exploring impact of CPT-L on PTSD symptoms and HIV outcomes compared to a Lifesteps + Standard of Care condition. This innovative research extends PTSD treatment approaches as a paradigm to reduce barriers to ART adherence. Findings of this innovative study are significant because they support the Undetectable = Untransmittable (U[bond, double bond]U) campaign and can help prevent the transmission of HIV infection through increased viral suppression.

Bone health in HIV-infected children and adolescents.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Chronic HIV infection and exposure to antiretroviral therapy compromises bone health in children and adolescents, potentially impacting their long-term quality of life. Thus, the purpose of this article is to review the most recent literature on this topic in HIV-infected children and adolescents. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent studies continue to demonstrate bone abnormalities in HIV-infected children and adolescents, whether HIV is acquired perinatally or during adolescence. Researchers have employed new modalities, both high tech and those that can be utilized in resource-limited settings, to better assess bone health. New data suggest that this population may also be experiencing an increase incidence of fractures, and they may not acquire the same peak bone mass as their HIV-uninfected counterparts. Reassuringly, however, in-utero tenofovir exposure does not appear to have a significant impact on bone health in HIV-exposed, uninfected infants. SUMMARY: HIV-infected children and adolescents are exposed to HIV and antiretroviral therapy for many decades starting early in life and during the most critical time for skeletal growth and bone mass accrual. Recent findings underscore the need for further research on bone in this population. Longitudinal studies are especially needed to evaluate long-term risk of osteoporosis and fracture.

Statins to improve cardiovascular outcomes in treated HIV infection.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To evaluate evidence that statins reduce cardiovascular risk in patients living with HIV. RECENT FINDINGS: Moderate to high-dose atorvastatin and rosuvastatin appear to reduce noncalcified coronary plaque volume and slow progression of carotid intima-media thickness in patients with treated HIV infection. Expected lipoprotein changes with statins on the background of modern antiretroviral therapy are similar to the general population. In addition to lipids, the statin benefit may be mediated in part by improvements in vascular inflammation and levels of T-cell and monocyte activation. One concern is the potential for rosuvastatin to cause insulin resistance. Decisions to prescribe statins must be done in the context of global risk assessment, but traditional risk calculators such as the Framingham Risk Score or the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association pooled-risk equations underestimate risk in this population. Furthermore, many patients with subclinical disease would not be recommended for statins according to the most recent American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines. SUMMARY: Statins are likely to improve cardiovascular outcomes for patients with HIV, but results of the first outcome study are not expected until 2020. In the meantime, clinicians should individualize statin prescriptions, and should consider using more potent statins (rosuvastatin, atorvastatin, and pitavastatin) when possible.