Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Surgeon ; 2024 May 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38749901

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Medical tourism refers to the process of patients travelling outside of their native country to undergo elective surgical procedures and is a rapidly expanding healthcare phenomenon [1-3]. Whilst a multitude of established Private Healthcare Providers (PHPs) offer cosmetic surgical procedures within the United Kingdom (UK), a growing number of patients are opting to travel outside of the UK to undergo cosmetic surgery. AIM: To assess the number of patients presenting to the Canniesburn Plastic Surgery Unit, with cosmetic surgery tourism complications, from outside of the UK, and the associated costs to NHS Scotland over a five-year period. METHODS: A retrospective case review of a prospectively maintained trauma database, which records all acute referrals, was undertaken analysing patients referred from January 1st 2019 to December 31st 2023 inclusive. RESULTS: 81 patients presented over five years with complications of cosmetic surgery tourism. The most common presenting complaints were wound dehiscence (49.4%) or wound infection (24.7%). The total cost to NHS Scotland was £755,559.68 with an average of £9327.90 per patient. CONCLUSION: This is the largest single centre cohort of cosmetic surgery tourism complications reported within the NHS to date; with rates on the rise, demand grows for increased patient information regarding healthcare tourism risks, a national consensus on the extent of NHS management and urgent international collaboration with policymakers is required to address this issue across borders.

3.
J Med Microbiol ; 71(12)2022 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36748613

RESUMO

Introduction. Aggregatibacter are Gram-negative, facultatively anaerobic rods or coccobacilli that are infrequently encountered as pathogens causing infection.Hypothesis/Gap Statement. The range of invasive infection that Aggregatibacter cause is poorly described. The pathogenicity of species such as Aggregatibacter segnis is debated.Aim. To identify invasive infection due to Aggregatibacter species in a large healthcare organization and to characterize clinical syndromes, co-morbidities and risk factors.Methodology. All microbiological samples positive for Aggregatibacter species were identified by conventional culture or 16S rRNA PCR between October 2017 and March 2021. Electronic records for all patients with positive samples were reviewed and the infection syndrome classified for patients with invasive disease.Results. Twenty-seven patients with invasive infection were identified, with a statistically significant difference in species-specific patterns of invasive infection (P=0.02) and a statistically significant association with residence in the 30 % most deprived households in the UK by postcode (P<0.01). The three most common co-morbidities were periodontitis or recent dental work (29.6%), cardiovascular disease (25.9%) and diabetes (18.5 %).Conclusion. We describe a novel association of Aggregatibacter segnis with skin and soft tissue infection. The propensity of the Aggregatibacter species to cause invasive infection at different body sites and be associated with deprivation is reported. Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans bacteraemia was associated with infective endocarditis, and Aggregatibacter aphrophilus was implicated in severe appendicitis and noted to cause brain abscess. Areas warranting future research include exploring the risk-factors required for invasive infection and those that may determine the species-specific differences in patterns of invasive disease.


Assuntos
Endocardite Bacteriana , Humanos , Aggregatibacter/genética , Estudos Retrospectivos , RNA Ribossômico 16S/genética , Endocardite Bacteriana/microbiologia
4.
J Thorac Dis ; 10(2): 1112-1120, 2018 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29607188

RESUMO

A high prevalence of depression is observed in patients undergoing cardiac surgery, and depression has been shown to be an independent predictor of morbidity and mortality in this patient population. Selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are the first-line recommended therapy for depressive disorders, however due to their platelet inhibitory actions they have been associated with increased incidences of post-operative bleeding. This review has sought to address whether the use of SSRIs is associated with a higher rate of mortality, major adverse events or bleeding events following cardiac surgery. A retrospective literature search selected studies comparing the use of SSRIs with no SSRI use in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Seven of the ten studies analysed reported no significant difference in mortality in SSRI users. Five of the seven studies reporting bleeding events demonstrated no significant difference in SSRI users. Three of the five studies reporting other significant morbidity demonstrated no significant difference in SSRI users. Our study demonstrates the safety of the use of SSRIs for the treatment of depressive disorders in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

5.
Perfusion ; 33(6): 415-422, 2018 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29569518

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Depressive illness has a high prevalence in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). The first line treatment for depression are selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) which inhibit serotonin reuptake in the presynaptic neuronal membrane and uptake by platelets, inhibiting subsequent serotonin-mediated platelet activation. This presents a theoretically increased risk of bleeding and subsequent postoperative mortality. This review aims to investigate the effects of SSRIs on postoperative bleeding, defined as the need for transfusions and re-operation for bleeding, as well as 30-day mortality in patients undergoing CABG. METHOD: Four hundred and thirty-seven papers were screened with seven meeting the full inclusion criteria. RESULTS: Meta-analysis demonstrated that SSRI use increased the risk of red blood cell transfusion (odds ratio (OR) = 1.15; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.06-1.26), but resulted in no difference in the rate of re-operation for bleeding (OR = 1.07; 95% CI: 0.66-1.74). SSRI use had no effect on the rates of platelet (OR = 0.93; 95% CI: 0.79-1.09) or fresh frozen plasma (OR = 0.96; 95% CI: 0.74-1.24) transfusion nor on the mortality rate (OR =1.03; 95 CI: 0.90-1.17). CONCLUSION: This review demonstrates that SSRIs are largely safe in cardiac surgery as no increase in mortality was observed. However, there is a significantly raised chance of red blood cell transfusion. The heterogeneous nature of the current evidence base highlights the need for further research into SSRIs and whether any effect on patient outcomes in cardiac surgery occurs.


Assuntos
Ponte de Artéria Coronária/efeitos adversos , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/induzido quimicamente , Inibidores Seletivos de Recaptação de Serotonina/efeitos adversos , Ponte de Artéria Coronária/mortalidade , Transtorno Depressivo/tratamento farmacológico , Transfusão de Eritrócitos , Humanos , Estudos Observacionais como Assunto , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/mortalidade , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/terapia , Risco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...