The role of intercostal nerve preservation in pain control after thoracotomy.

OBJECTIVES: Pain control after thoracotomy is an important issue that affects the outcome in thoracic surgery. Intercostal nerve preservation (ICNP) has increased interest in the outcomes of conventional thoracotomy. The current study critically evaluates the role of preservation of the intercostal nerve in early and late pain control and its benefit in patients undergoing thoracotomy. METHODS: Data obtained prospectively between January 2006 and December 2010 by a study colleague at our division of General Thoracic Surgery were retrospectively analysed. There were 491 patients who underwent thoracotomy. Eighty-one patients were excluded from the study due to incompatible data. Patients were divided into two groups according to the intercostal nerve state: Group I consisted of patients with ICNP and Group II consisted of patients with intercostal nerve sacrifice. RESULTS: Group I consisted of 288 patients [206 male (71%), P < 0.001, mean age 66 years]. Group II consisted of 122 patients [79 male (64%), P = 0.001, mean age 66 years]. There was less use of opiate in Group I (P = 0.019). Early mobilization of the patients was significantly higher in Group I (P = 0.031). The rate of pneumonia and re-admission to the intensive care unit was higher in Group II (P = 0.017 and 0.023, respectively). The rate of pain-free patients at discharge was significantly higher in Group I (P = 0.028). A 2-week follow-up after hospital discharge showed parasternal hypoesthesia to be more in Group II (P = 0.034). Significant patient contentment in Group I was noticed (P = 0.014). Chronic post-thoracotomy pain (CPTP) was higher in Group II (P = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: ICNP without harvesting an intercostal muscle flap achieves excellent outcomes in controlling acute post-thoracotomy pain and CPTP. ICNP is an effective, simple method to perform, and it should be considered as standard in performing thoracotomy.

Ventilation performance of a mixed group of operators using a new rescue breathing device-the glossopalatinal tube.

INTRODUCTION: We studied how effectively a mixed group of helpers could ventilate a manikin with a new rescue breathing device after a short period of instruction. The device consists of a mouthcap, a "glossopalatinal tube" (GPT) reaching between tongue and palate and a connector for a bag, ventilator or the rescuers mouth. Rather than reaching behind the tongue like an oropharyngeal airway (OP), it is able to scoop the tongue off the posterior pharyngeal wall when tilted by the rescuer. It was compared with a conventional face mask with an OP. METHODS: The study made use of an anaesthesia simulator (MedSim Ltd., Israel) and a manikin. 46 subjects with different professional backgrounds (anaesthesia nurses, medical students, emergency medical technicians (EMTs), physicians training for anaesthesiology) underwent a standard introduction to the GPT and OP (lecture with demonstration on an intubation trainer, illustrated brochure). They ventilated the manikin for 5 min each using the bag plus GPT and the OP plus face mask, respectively, in random order after the simulator had been made apnoeic and the simulated arterial oxygen saturation (S(aO(2))) had dropped to 80%. The actions and the results (tidal volumes (V(t)), S(aO(2))) were recorded on video. The subjects graded difficulty of operation and fatigue on a visual analogue scale (VAS). RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Mean V(t) with the OP plus mask amounted to 463 (230-688 ml), with GPT to 426 (243-610 ml) (median [10-90% percentiles]) (P=0.047). No differences were observed with respect to the time a S(aO(2))> or =90% was maintained (OP plus mask: 255 (139-266 s), GPT: 255 (90-269 s)) or the grades for fatigue (OP plus mask: 58% of VAS, GPT: 48% of VAS, median) and difficulty (OP plus mask: 16% of VAS, GPT: 21% of VAS). Performance and grades were scattered over a wide range. Success with the two devices was correlated, but the subjects judgement tended to diverge. The GPT is an easy to learn alternative to conventional devices and might be helpful in clinical emergencies, including situations of unexpectedly difficult ventilation.