Tissue factor in predicted severe acute pancreatitis.

AIM: to study tissue factor (TF) in acute pancreatitis and evaluate the role of TF as a predictive marker of severity. METHODS: forty-nine consecutive patients admitted to Lund University Hospital, fulfilling the criteria of predicted severe acute pancreatitis (AP), were recruited prospectively between 2002 and 2004. Blood samples for TF analyses were drawn at inclusion in the study and 12 h, 1 d and 3 d later. RESULTS: twenty-seven patients developed mild AP, and 22 patients severe AP. At inclusion in the study, the groups were comparable with respect to gender, aetiology, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, and duration of pain. At inclusion in the study and at 12 h, TF was higher in the severe AP group (P = 0.035 and P = 0.049, respectively). After 1 and 3 d, no differences in TF levels were noted. Interleukin (IL)-6 was significantly higher in the severe AP group at all of the studied time points. C-reactive protein (CRP) was significantly higher in the AP group at 1 and 3 d. In receiver operating characteristic-curves, the area under the curve (AUC) for TF was 0.679 (P = 0.035) at inclusion in the study, and a cut off level for TF of 40 pg/mL showed a sensitivity of 71% and a specificity of 67%, whereas corresponding AUC for IL-6 was 0.775, P = 0.001, and for CRP was 0.653. IL-6 showed better AUC-values than TF at all time points studied. CONCLUSION: TF-levels are raised early in severe AP. TF as an early predictive marker of severe AP is superior to CRP, but inferior to IL-6.

Immediate oral feeding in patients with mild acute pancreatitis is safe and may accelerate recovery--a randomized clinical study.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: In acute pancreatitis, traditional treatment has been initial fasting on purpose to avoid activation of proteolytic enzymes and pancreatic enzyme secretion. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of immediate oral feeding as compared to traditional fasting in patients with mild acute pancreatitis. METHODS: Sixty patients were randomized to the two treatment groups, fasting or immediate oral feeding. The inclusion criteria were pancreas amylase > or =3 times above normal, onset of abdominal pain within 48 h, acute physiological and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) score<8 and C-reactive protein (CRP) <150 mg/L. Outcome measures were pancreas-specific amylase, systemic inflammatory response, feasibility and length of hospital stay (LOHS). RESULTS: The groups were comparable with respect to age, sex, etiology, APACHE, time from onset of pain and amylase at admission. No significant differences were seen between the groups concerning levels of amylase, CRP, leukocytes, abdominal pain or number of gastrointestinal symptoms. The LOHS was significantly shorter in the oral feeding group (4 vs. 6 days; p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: No signs of exacerbation of the disease process were seen in terms of significant differences between treatment groups for amylase or systemic inflammatory response. In mild acute pancreatitis, immediate oral feeding was feasible and safe and may accelerate recovery without adverse gastrointestinal events.

Acute pancreatitis--from cellular signalling to complicated clinical course.

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a common disease that has a mild to moderate course in most cases. During the last decade, a change in diagnostic facilities as well as improved intensive care have influenced both morbidity and mortality in AP. Still, however, a number of controversies and unresolved questions remain regarding AP. These include prognostic factors and how these may be used to improve outcome, diagnostic possibilities, their indications and optimal timing, and the systemic inflammatory reaction (systemic inflammatory response syndrome--SIRS) and its effect on the concomitant course of the disease and potential development of organ failure. The role of the gut has been suggested to be important in severe AP, but has recently been somewhat questioned. Despite extensive research, pharmacological and medical intervention of proven clinical value is scarce. Various aspects on surgical interventions, including endoscopic sphincterotomy, cholecystectomy and necrosectomy, as regards indications and timing, will be reviewed. Last, but not least, are the management of late complications and long-term outcome for patients with especially severe AP.

Severe acute pancreatitis--outcome following a primarily non-surgical regime.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) is associated with a high morbidity and mortality. The aim was to evaluate treatment, risk factors and outcome in SAP in a centre with a restrictive attitude to surgery. METHODS: All cases of acute pancreatitis admitted 1994-2003 were analysed retrospectively. SAP was defined as organ failure and/or hospital stay >7 days together with one or more of: C-reactive protein >150 mg/l within 72 h after admission, necrosis on computed tomography and need for treatment in the intensive care unit. RESULTS: 185 (22%) of patients with acute pancreatitis fulfilled the criteria for SAP. 175 patients were included, mean age 61 +/- 17 years. Hospital stay was in median 13 days. Forty-six patients had some surgical intervention, in 14 cases directed at the pancreas (8%). Hospital mortality was 9% (n = 16), in 88% (n = 14) associated with multiple organ dysfunction and 50% (n = 8) of the deaths occurred within the first week after admission. Of the parameters registered on admission, age and hypotension (systolic blood pressure <100 mm Hg) were identified as risk factors for death. CONCLUSION: The present treatment regime for SAP as defined above resulted in a 9% mortality rate, with age and hypotension at admission as predictive factors for death.

Early nasogastric feeding in predicted severe acute pancreatitis: A clinical, randomized study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of early, nasogastric enteral nutrition (EN) with total parenteral nutrition (TPN) in patients with predicted severe acute pancreatitis (SAP). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: In SAP, the magnitude of the inflammatory response as well as increased intestinal permeability correlates with outcome. Enteral feeding has been suggested superior to parenteral feeding due to a proposed beneficial effect on the gut barrier. METHODS: Fifty patients who met the inclusion criteria were randomized to TPN or EN groups. The nutritional regimen was started within 24 hours from admission and EN was provided through a nasogastric tube. The observation period was 10 days. Intestinal permeability was measured by excretion of polyethylene glycol (PEG) and concentrations of antiendotoxin core antibodies (Endocab). Interleukins (IL)-6 IL-8, and C-reactive protein (CRP) were used as markers of the systemic inflammatory response. Morbidity and feasibility of the nutritional route were evaluated by the frequency of complications, gastrointestinal symptoms, and abdominal pain. RESULTS: PEG, Endocab, CRP, IL-6, APACHE II score, severity according to the Atlanta classification (22 patients), and gastrointestinal symptoms or abdominal pain did not significantly differ between the groups. The incidence of hyperglycemia was significantly higher in TPN patients (21 of 26 vs. 7 of 23; P < 0.001). Total complications (25 vs. 52; P = 0.04) and pulmonary complications (10 vs. 21; P = 0.04) were significantly more frequent in EN patients, although complications were diagnosed dominantly within the first 3 days. CONCLUSION: In predicted SAP, nasogastric early EN was feasible and resulted in better control of blood glucose levels, although the overall early complication rate was higher in the EN group. No beneficial effects on intestinal permeability or the inflammatory response were seen by EN treatment.

Fluid resuscitation and nutritional support during severe acute pancreatitis in the past: what have we learned and how can we do better?

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Severe acute pancreatitis is associated with microcirculatory impairment, increased gut permeability and metabolic changes. The aim of the present study was to evaluate initial fluid resuscitation and nutritional support versus outcome in patients with severe acute pancreatitis. METHODS: All cases of acute pancreatitis admitted 1994-2003 were analyzed retrospectively. The inclusion criteria of severe acute pancreatitis were organ failure and/or local complications according to the Atlanta classification system. Mortality was used as outcome measure. RESULTS: Ninty-nine patients were included in the study. The hospital mortality was 17%. Hypovolemia at arrival was found in 13% (13/99) and correlated with increased hospital mortality (P=0.009). During the first three days in average 11000+/-4100 ml of fluids and 1470+/-820 calories were administered. Total parental nutrition was given to 73% (69/95) and enteral nutrition served as a complement in 29% (28/95) of the patients. Hyperglycemia was seen in 61% (55/90) of the patients and insulin was administered to 53% (29/55) at an average glucose level of 19+/-3 mmol/l. The intake of oral food was reintroduced in average 15+/-9 days after admission and was interrupted in 17% (13/75) because of pain relapse. CONCLUSION: A nutritional treatment regime in severe acute pancreatitis including a moderate and hypocaloric initial fluid resuscitation, parental nutrition as the preferred route for nutritional support and a non-strict glucose control, with an associated mortality of 17%, indicates several modes of improving outcome.