Early Use of Aspirin for Coronary Allograft Prophylaxis in Heart Transplant Recipients.

BACKGROUND: Coronary allograft vasculopathy (CAV) remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality after heart transplantation. The use of aspirin for CAV prophylaxis has recently garnered interest as a possible therapeutic adjunct in this setting. METHODS: This 2-center retrospective cohort study included 372 patients who underwent heart transplantation between January 2009 and March 2018 and were stratified according to the commencement of aspirin during their index transplant admission. The primary outcome was the development of moderate or severe CAV (International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation grade ≥2) at surveillance coronary angiography. Secondary endpoints included mortality at follow-up. RESULTS: There were no differences in age, sex, and cause of heart failure. In the early aspirin group, the preponderant risk factors included use of ventricular assist devices, pretransplant smoking, and mild or moderate rejection. Multivariable analyses to assess for independent predictors of CAV development and mortality demonstrated that aspirin was associated with reduced mortality (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.19; 95% confidence interval, 0.08-0.47, P < 0.01) and a trend toward a protective effect against the development of moderate or severe CAV (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.24; 95% confidence interval, 0.54-1.19; P = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective risk-adjusted 2-center cohort study, early aspirin administration was associated with reduced risk of death and a trend toward a protective effect against CAV development. These findings warrant validation in prospective randomized trials.

Safety and tolerability of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in bridge-to-transplant patients supported with centrifugal-flow left ventricular assist devices.

BACKGROUND: The safety and tolerability of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in patients with end-stage heart failure supported with left-ventricular-assist-devices (LVADs), irrespective of diabetes mellitus, is not known. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 31 outpatients implanted with LVADs as bridge-to-transplant (BTT) was conducted. Patients with biventricular support, aged under 18 years, who were discharged from the index hospitalisation, or were prescribed SGLT2i prior to their first outpatient clinic were excluded. Patient demographics, laboratory studies, pump haemodynamic and adverse event data was collected. RESULTS: Sixteen (51.6%) of 31 patients were prescribed SGLT2i over median 101.5 days (37.5-190.8). No patients discontinued SGLT2i use or reported attributable adverse symptoms. No significant differences between patients prescribed SGLT2i compared to those SGLT2i-naïve were seen in: [1] renal function; [2] weight; [3] mean arterial pressure. There were numerically lower infection-related (n = 4 vs 7, HR 0.32 (0.08-1.28), p = 0.11) and haemocompatibility-related (n = 3 vs 4, HR 0.52 (0.09-2.83), p = 0.45) adverse events in the SGLT2i group, albeit non-significant. CONCLUSIONS: We found SGLT2i to be safe and well-tolerated in the BTT LVAD cohort with no significant difference in rates of infection or haemocompatibility-related adverse events with SGLT2i use. Larger studies will inform further beneficial effects of SGLT2i prescription in this cohort.