Renal transplant from infant and neonatal donors is a feasible option for the treatment of end-stage renal disease but is associated with increased early graft loss.

Kidney transplants from young pediatric donors are uncommonly performed in the UK. Published literature of kidney transplant from donors weighing less than 5 kg is sparse. We present our initial experience of en bloc kidney transplantation (EKT) from donors weighing less than 20 kg, including neonatal donors. All recipients undergoing EKT from donors under 20 kg at our center from January 2005 to October 2016 were included. Donor and recipient details were recorded from a prospective database. Electronic patient records were examined for follow-up data. Of 30 EKTs included, 15 were from ≤5 kg donors and 15 from >5 kg donors (median weight 3.4 and 12.7 kg, respectively). One-year graft survival for ≤5 kg and >5 kg donors for EKT was 86.7% and 93.3% (P = 0.85), respectively. Progressive improvement in estimated GFR (eGFR) was noted in both donor categories through first-year posttransplant but in the ≤5 kg donor category significant improvement was seen at 12 months compared to 3 months after transplantation (median eGFR 37.3 vs 70.0 mL/min/1.73 m2 , P = 0.03). Two early graft losses were attributable to early vascular complications and one graft loss due to primary nonfunction. Our data show that kidney transplantation from such donors is a feasible option at centers with experience of EKT, albeit with increased risk of early graft loss.

Bilateral adrenal hemorrhage in a neonatal kidney donor.

EKT from neonatal donors remains rare despite successful outcome being reported. The surgical aspects of neonatal abdominal organ recovery remain unfamiliar to the vast majority of abdominal organ recovery teams and renal transplant surgeons. BAH is not uncommon in newborn babies suffering distress in the perinatal period. BAH is often also associated with RVT and will impact on utilization of kidneys for transplantation. We present a case of a neonatal kidney donor with massive BAHs discovered at the time of organ recovery. This made the procurement challenging. Both kidneys were recovered en bloc with pancreas and the liver with aorta and inferior vena cave as vascular conduits. The kidneys were successfully implanted into an adult recipient with good function at 1-year follow-up. Association between adrenal hemorrhage and RVT needs to be considered before utilizing such kidneys. This case exemplifies successful outcome after careful assessment and transplantation of such kidneys.

Non-HLA-matched 3rd party vascular allograft in renal transplant may lead to sensitization against donor HLA.

3rd party donor vessels are often used for vascular reconstruction in organ transplantation. While current practice ensures that 3rd party vessels are blood group matched, HLA matching to the non-intended recipient is not performed. This practice potentially sensitizes the recipient and may reduce their future chance of renal transplant from a larger pool of donors. We examined our cohort of renal transplant recipients who received non-HLA-matched 3rd party vessels for the de-novo development of donor-specific HLA antibodies. Our institution's Human Tissue Authority (HTA) blood vessel registers were examined to identify stored donor vessels and their non-intended recipients. Donor vessel HLA status was cross-referenced with the recipient HLA status. Between 2004 and 2014, five patients were identified that received 3rd party non-HLA-matched vessels for vascular reconstruction during renal transplantation. Three patients (60%) subsequently developed donor-specific HLA antibodies. These data provide evidence that use of non-HLA-matched stored 3rd party vascular grafts may lead to sensitization in the recipient. Where time permits, HLA matching should be performed to avoid this allogeneic response. Laboratories monitoring DSA should be aware of any patient receiving a non-HLA-matched 3rd party vascular graft, and recipients may benefit from increased post-transplant immunological vigilance.

Impact of the new fast track kidney allocation scheme for declined kidneys in the United Kingdom.

INTRODUCTION: A "new" fast track kidney allocation scheme (FTKAS) was implemented in the UK in 2012 for offering of previously declined kidneys. We evaluated the impact of the FTKAS in utilization of declined kidneys and outcome. METHODS: Adult renal transplant centers were surveyed. Overall utilization was evaluated using National Health Service Blood and Transplant (NHSBT) data. Outcome of FTKAS kidneys in our center was analyzed. RESULTS: Centers cited graft, patient outcome concerns, and inadequate logistical support for their non-FTKAS participation. In the first year of the scheme, 266 kidneys were offered through the FTKAS, 158 were transplanted in 10 centers (59%). In comparison, 166 kidneys were offered through previous system over five yr (2006-2011), and 65 were utilized in 59 transplants (39%). In our center, 42 kidneys were transplanted in 39 recipients. One-yr graft and patient survival were both 95%. Results were comparable to a matched group of kidney transplants during the same periods allocated via the standard scheme. CONCLUSIONS: The FTKAS has led to effective utilization of the declined kidneys with outcome comparable to kidneys allocated through the standard scheme. Non-participation based on outcome concerns is mostly subjective while logistical issues need to be addressed.

Renal Transplantation From Pediatric Donors in the United Kingdom.

BACKGROUND: Significant disparity exists in the United Kingdom between the need for organ transplant and supply of deceased donor organs. In the recent years, efforts to increase donation has improved the rate of mainly deceased donors after circulatory death and from older donors. The rate of donation from pediatric population has remained low and those younger than 2 years including neonatal donation has remained largely unexplored. METHODS: A retrospective review of the outcome of renal transplantation from pediatric donor (<18 years) kidneys in the United Kingdom. RESULTS: Our results show a poor referral and conversion rate, and high discard rate (43%) of kidneys procured from donors younger than 2 years. During the 15-year study period (1997-2011), 47 donors younger than 2 years were referred (3 per year). Of these, 26 proceeded to donation resulting in 17 transplants (65% utilization). The referral rate for donors 2 years or older to younger than 5 years also remains low (76 in 15 years), but the conversion (88%) and utilization rates (73%) are better in this group. There was better utilization in donors aged 5 years or older to younger than 18 years. Overall graft and patient survival remains excellent in all 3 groups; with comparable survival of 82%, 85%, and 77% (P = 0.29) with mean follow-up periods of 9, 12.5, and 11.8 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Despite excellent outcome, the referral, donation, and utilization of kidneys from donors younger than 5 years and particularly those younger than 2 years remain low. We suggest implementing improved strategies to increase donation from this group of population.

Transplantation of solid organs procured from influenza A H1N1 infected donors.

Following the influenza A H1N1 (swine flu) pandemic, there remains little evidence informing the safety of transplanting organs from donors suspected or diagnosed with H1N1. Limited guidelines from the major transplant societies leave the use of such organs at the discretion of individual transplant centres, and practice varies considerably both nationally and internationally. We present the largest published series of outcome following transplantation of organs from H1N1 positive donors and demonstrate that these organs can be transplanted safely and with good short-term outcome. We discuss our local policy for treatment of recipients with Oseltamivir.

Who should have pelvic vessel imaging prior to renal transplantation?

Current guidelines are vague in their recommendations as to which patients should be imaged prior to renal transplantation and the optimal imaging modality for this purpose. Data on 112 patients who underwent pre-transplant vascular imaging (magnetic resonance angiography or contrast angiography), from a total of 167 evaluated between January 2005 and October 2006, were scrutinized to see whether abnormal results altered clinical management. Several variables were analyzed to determine possible predictors of an abnormal scan result. Sixty-nine patients (61.6%) were either diabetic or aged over 60. Fifty-nine (52.7%) were normal scans, and 53 (47.3%) were abnormal. In the abnormal group, 21 (18.8%) clinical decisions were made. Multivariate analysis revealed that age (OR: 1.1, 1.03-1.13) and diabetes (OR: 3.2, 1.13-9.2) were significant predictors of an abnormal scan. Imaging delayed transplant listing by 83 days. Imaging for all potential transplant recipients is not required and results in unnecessary delay. Risk factors including age and diabetes can be utilized to rationalize imaging via clinical guidelines to target to high-risk groups. The choice of imaging modality in patients with renal insufficiency is not clear cut, but risks and benefits should be addressed on an individual basis and preventative strategies used whenever possible.