RESUMO
STRUCTURED ABSTRACTO_ST_ABSBackgroundC_ST_ABSEndothelial cell (EC) activation, endotheliitis, vascular permeability, and thrombosis have been observed in patients with severe COVID-19, indicating that the vasculature is affected during the acute stages of SARS-CoV-2 infection. It remains unknown whether circulating vascular markers are sufficient to predict clinical outcomes, are unique to COVID-19, and if vascular permeability can be therapeutically targeted. MethodsEvaluating the prevalence of circulating inflammatory, cardiac and EC activation markers, and the development of a microRNA atlas in 241 patients with suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection, allowed their prognostic value to be assessed by a Random Forest model machine learning approach. Subsequent ex vivo experiments assessed EC permeability responses to patient plasma and were used to uncover modulated gene regulatory networks from which rational therapeutic design was inferred. FindingsMultiple inflammatory and EC activation biomarkers were associated with mortality in COVID-19 patients and in severity-matched SARS-CoV-2-negative patients, while dysregulation of specific microRNAs at presentation was specific for poor COVID-19-related outcomes and revealed disease-relevant pathways. Integrating the datasets using a machine learning approach further enhanced clinical risk prediction for in-hospital mortality. Exposure of ECs to COVID-19 patient plasma resulted in severity-specific gene expression responses and EC barrier dysfunction which was ameliorated using angiopoietin-1 mimetic or recombinant Slit2-N. InterpretationIntegration of multi-omics data identified microRNA and vascular biomarkers prognostic of in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients and revealed that vascular stabilizing therapies should be explored as a treatment for endothelial dysfunction in COVID-19, and other severe diseases where endothelial dysfunction has a central role in pathogenesis. RESEARCH IN CONTEXTO_ST_ABSEvidence before this studyC_ST_ABSWhile diagnostic testing has allowed for the rapid identification of COVID-19 cases, the lack of post-diagnosis risk assessment metrics, especially among the highest-risk subgroups, thereby undermined the cascade and allocation of care. To date, the integration of clinical data with broad omics technologies has opened up new avenues for efficiently delineating complex patient phenotypes and their associations with clinical outcomes, with circulating profiles of plasma microRNAs (miRNA), in particular, having been shown to be tightly associated with disease, and capable of providing not only detailed prognostic information but also mechanistic insight. Added value of this studyMarkers of endothelial dysfunction at presentation, while indicative of poor outcomes in COVID-19-positive patients, likely reflect systemic vascular dysfunction in critically ill patients and are not specific to SARS-CoV-2 infection. More so, the generation of a plasma microRNA atlas uncovers COVID-19-specific prognostic markers and multiple disease-specific pathways of interest, including endothelial barrier dysfunction. Furthermore, synthesis of electronic health record data with clinically relevant multi-omic datasets using a machine learning approach provides substantially better metrics by which mortality can be estimated in patients with severe COVID-19. Finally, targeted stabilization of the endothelial barrier with Q-Peptide and Slit2-N are novel therapeutic avenues that should be explored in COVID-19 patients. Implications of all the available evidenceTogether, our work provides biological insight into the role of the endothelium in SARS-CoV-2 infection, the importance of miRNA as disease- and pathway-specific biomarkers, and the exciting possibility that endothelial barrier stabilizing treatments might hold promise in COVID-19.
RESUMO
PurposeSeveral studies have reported adopting prone positioning (PP) in non-intubated patients with COVID-19-related hypoxaemic respiratory failure. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the impact of PP on oxygenation and clinical outcomes. MethodsWe searched PubMed, Embase and COVID-19 living systematic review from December1st 2019 to July23rd 2020. We included studies that reported using PP in hypoxaemic, non-intubated adult COVID-19 patients. Primary outcome measure was the weighted mean difference (MD) in oxygenation parameters (PaO2/FiO2, PaO2 or SpO2) pre and post-PP. ResultsFifteen single arm observational studies reporting PP in 449 patients were included. Substantial heterogeneity was noted in terms of, location within hospital where PP was instituted, respiratory supports, frequency and duration of PP. Significant improvement in oxygenation was reported post-PP: PaO2/FiO2, (MD 37.6, 95%CI 18.8, 56.5); PaO2, (MD 30.4 mmHg, 95%CI 10.9, 49.9); and SpO2, (MD 5.8%, 95%CI 3.7, 7.9). Patients with a pre-PP PaO2/FiO2 [≤]150 experienced greater oxygenation improvements compared with those with a pre-PP PaO2/FiO2 >150 (MD 40.5, 95%CI -3.5, 84.6) vs. 37, 95%CI 17.1, 56.9). Respiratory rate decreased post-PP (MD -2.9, 95%CI -5.4, -0.4). Overall intubation and mortality rates were 21% (90/426) and 26% (101/390) respectively. No major adverse events were reported. ConclusionsDespite significant variability in frequency and duration of PP and respiratory supports, PP was associated with improvements in oxygenation parameters without any reported serious adverse events. Major limitation being lack of control arm and adjustment for confounders. Clinical trials are required to determine the effect of awake PP on patient-centred outcomes. Systematic review registrationRegistration/protocol in PROSPERO (CRD42020194080). What is the key question?Is the novel approach of prone positioning in non-intubated patients associated with improvement in oxygenation? What is the bottom line?Prone position in non-intubated severe COIVD 19 suffers is associated with improvement of oxygenation while the short- and long-term patient centred out comes in this awake prone patient need more investigation. Why read on?Our study is first of its kind (Systematic review and Meta-analysis) summarising the evidence surrounding the less invasive innovate technique of prone position in non-intubated COVID-19 patients.
