Patients want to know about the 'cardiac blues'.

BACKGROUND: Much attention has been given to identifying and supporting the minority of patients who develop severe clinical depression after a cardiac event. However, relatively little has been given to supporting the many patients who experience transient but significant emotional disturbance that we term the 'cardiac blues'. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate patients' preferences regarding information provision about cardiac blues. METHODS: One hundred and sixty consecutive cardiac patients admitted to two Victorian hospitals in Australia were interviewed three times over six months. They were asked about emotional issues, including information provision preferences. RESULTS: Four out of five (81%) patients would like to have received information about the cardiac blues, but only a minority received this information. CONCLUSION: Most patients want to know about cardiac blues. The development and evaluation of resources for health professionals and patients to support recovery through cardiac blues appears warranted.

Red flags for persistent or worsening anxiety and depression after an acute cardiac event: a 6-month longitudinal study in regional and rural Australia.

BACKGROUND: While early symptoms of anxiety and depression resolve for many patients soon after an acute cardiac event, the persistence or worsening of symptoms indicates increased mortality risk. It is therefore important to identify the predictors, or red flags, of persistent or worsening anxiety and depression symptoms. Most previous research has focussed on metropolitan patients, hence the need for studies of regional and rural dwellers. METHOD: In this study, 160 cardiac patients consecutively admitted to two hospitals in regional Victoria, Australia, were interviewed in hospital and 2 and 6 months after discharge. Anxiety and depression were assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Growth mixture modelling was used to identify the trajectories of anxiety and depression over the 6 months after the acute event, and post-hoc tests identified predictors of persistent or worsening symptoms. RESULTS: For both anxiety and depression, three common symptom trajectories were identified. Inhospital anxiety symptoms tended to persist over time, whereas inhospital depression symptoms resolved for some patients and worsened for others. A mental health history, younger age, smoking, financial stress, poor self-rated health, and social isolation were red flags for persistent anxiety and worsening depression. Additionally, diabetes, and other comorbidities were red flags for persistent anxiety. CONCLUSIONS: The results highlight several potential red flags for increased risk of persistent anxiety or worsening depressive symptoms after a cardiac event, including demographic, psychosocial, and behavioural indicators. These red flags could assist with identification of at-risk patients on admission to or discharge from hospital, thereby enabling targeting of interventions.

Airway obstruction from accidental ingestion of a live fish.

We present a case of a fisherman who swallowed a live fish, which resulted in severe upper airway obstruction. The firm attachments of the fish's external fins and scales to the airway limit the removal when impacted. We outline our emergency airway management strategies and focus our discussion on the technique used to remove the impacted fish from the upper airway, which was paramount for the successful outcome of this case.

Prehospital rapid sequence intubation improves functional outcome for patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether paramedic rapid sequence intubation in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) improves neurologic outcomes at 6 months compared with intubation in the hospital. BACKGROUND: Severe TBI is associated with a high rate of mortality and long-term morbidity. Comatose patients with TBI routinely undergo endo-tracheal intubation to protect the airway, prevent hypoxia, and control ventilation. In many places, paramedics perform intubation prior to hospital arrival. However, it is unknown whether this approach improves outcomes. METHODS: In a prospective, randomized, controlled trial, we assigned adults with severe TBI in an urban setting to either prehospital rapid sequence intubation by paramedics or transport to a hospital emergency department for intubation by physicians. The primary outcome measure was the median extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOSe) score at 6 months. Secondary end-points were favorable versus unfavorable outcome at 6 months, length of intensive care and hospital stay, and survival to hospital discharge. RESULTS: A total of 312 patients with severe TBI were randomly assigned to paramedic rapid sequence intubation or hospital intubation. The success rate for paramedic intubation was 97%. At 6 months, the median GOSe score was 5 (interquartile range, 1-6) in patients intubated by paramedics compared with 3 (interquartile range, 1-6) in the patients intubated at hospital (P = 0.28).The proportion of patients with favorable outcome (GOSe, 5-8) was 80 of 157 patients (51%) in the paramedic intubation group compared with 56 of 142 patients (39%) in the hospital intubation group (risk ratio, 1.28; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.64; P = 0.046). There were no differences in intensive care or hospital length of stay, or in survival to hospital discharge. CONCLUSIONS: In adults with severe TBI, prehospital rapid sequence intubation by paramedics increases the rate of favorable neurologic outcome at 6 months compared with intubation in the hospital.

Impact of an ICU Liaison Nurse Service on major adverse events in patients recently discharged from ICU.

AIM: To identify the effect of an ICU Liaison Nurse (LN) on major adverse events in patients recently discharged from the ICU. METHODS: Case-control study using a chart audit protocol to assess controls retrospectively and cases prospectively. Controls did not receive ICU-based follow-up care. Cases received at least three visits over 3 days from the ICU LN. The LN service operated 7 days/week 0800-1800. Data on a range of predictors and three major adverse events (unexpected death, surgical procedure needed, and transfer to a higher level of care) were collected using a purpose built audit form. RESULTS: A total of 388 patients (201 controls and 187 cases) were included in the study. Demographic and clinical characteristics were similar for both groups. A total of 165 major adverse events were identified in 129 patients. After controlling for all other potential predictors, patients who received the LN intervention were 1.82 times more likely to be transferred to a higher level of care (P=0.028) and 2.11 times more likely to require a surgical procedure (P=0.006). Surgical patients were 7.20 times as likely to require a surgical procedure (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the claim that ICU LN has a role in preventing adverse events. However as the control data was retrospective and the study was conducted at one site, other unknown factors may have influenced the results.

Recognition and communication of patient deterioration in a regional hospital: a multi-methods study.

OBJECTIVE: In this study we aimed to identify the cues that ward nurses and doctors use to identify patient deterioration and, secondly, examine the assessment and communication of deterioration in patients on acute wards of a regional hospital. METHODS: Mixed methods case study design in a 220 bed regional hospital. Case studies originated from patients admitted unexpectedly to ICU from general wards (n=17). Data collection occurred within 72 h of the patient's admission to ICU. Interviews with 11 nurses and 14 doctors, and chart audit of 17 patient records for the 24 h prior to ICU were undertaken. RESULTS: The results demonstrate reliance on vital signs for nurses and doctors for initial identification of patient deterioration. Subsequent to this, nurses relied on assessment of the patient's physical capabilities whilst doctors undertook additional clinical investigations. Admission category and co-morbidities increased clinicians' identification of deterioration but the extent of assessment was dictated by 'usual practice' for the regional hospital, the ward or particular patient category. A lack of timely referral to more senior clinicians was identified. Chart audit found that 13 (76%) patients had clinical markers prior to ICU admission and 10 (56%) had these markers for >2h in the previous 24h. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights inadequate communication between clinicians and lack of process for ensuring timely management when patients deteriorate in a regional hospital. The use of casual or locum staff who are less familiar with the clinical culture of regional hospitals may influence the recognition of, and response to, deteriorating ward patients.