Comparison of clinical and radiographic outcomes of arthroscopic-assisted percutaneous fixation versus open reduction internal fixation of lateral tibial plateau fractures.

PURPOSE: Treatment for tibial plateau fractures continues to evolve but maintains primary objectives of anatomic reduction of the joint line and a rapid recovery course. Arthroscopic-assisted percutaneous fixation (AAPF) has been introduced as an alternative to traditional open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). The purpose of the study is to compare clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients with low-energy Schatzker type I-III tibial plateau fractures treated with AAPF versus ORIF. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed at a level 1 trauma centre to compare outcomes of 120 patients (57 AAPF, 63 ORIF) with low-energy lateral Schatzker type I-III tibial plateau fractures who underwent tibial plateau fixation between 2009 and 2018. Demographic information, injury characteristics, and surgical treatment were recorded. The main outcome measurements included reduction step-off, joint space narrowing, time to weight bearing, and implant removal. RESULTS: There was no difference in age, gender distribution, BMI, ASA, Schatzker classification distribution, initial displacement, blood loss, and reduction step-off between the two groups (p > 0.05). Shorter tourniquet time (74.1 ± 21.7 vs 100.0 ± 21.0 min; p < 0.001), shorter time to full weight bearing (47.8 ± 15.2 vs. 69.1 ± 17.2 days; p < 0.001), and lower rate of joint space narrowing (3.5% vs. 28.6% with more than 1 mm, p < 0.001) were associated with the AAPF cohort, with no difference in pain, knee range of motion, or implant removal rate between the two cohorts. CONCLUSION: AAPF may be a viable alternative to ORIF for the management of low-energy tibial plateau fractures with outcomes not inferior compared to the traditional ORIF method.

Complications in the 2-Year Postoperative Period Following Pediatric Syndactyly Release.

PURPOSE: Syndactyly surgical release is one of the most common congenital hand surgeries performed by pediatric hand surgeons. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the complications associated with syndactyly release and determine factors that correlate with higher complication rates within the 2-year postoperative period. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was completed for patients who underwent syndactyly release at a single pediatric center between 2005 and 2018. Patients were included if they had a diagnosis of syndactyly and underwent surgical release, and excluded for a diagnosis of cleft hand, incomplete surgical documentation, surgery performed at an outside institution, or follow-up care that did not extend beyond the first postoperative visit. Complications were classified using the Clavien-Dindo (CD) system. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients met the inclusion criteria, which included 143 webs released in 85 surgeries. A total of 27 complications occurred for the 85 surgeries performed. The severity of complications was CD grade I or II in 23% of surgeries, most commonly unplanned cast changes, and CD grade III in 8% of surgeries. No CD grade IV or V complications occurred. The CD grade III complications included 6 reoperations. The complication rate was higher when performing >1 syndactyly release per surgery. It also was higher for patients undergoing >1 surgical event. Rates of complication per surgery were similar between patients with multiple surgeries compared with those with a single surgery. Concomitant diagnoses and complexity of syndactyly was not associated with a higher complication rate. CONCLUSIONS: Syndactyly release was associated with a complication rate of 31% per surgical event with 44% of these complications related to unplanned cast changes and 8% of complications that required admission or reoperation. Risk factors for complications following syndactyly release include >1web operated on per surgery and undergoing >1 surgical event. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognosis IV.

Easing of suffering in children with cancer at the end of life: is care changing?

PURPOSE: In the past decade studies have documented substantial suffering among children dying of cancer, prompting national attention on the quality of end-of-life care and the development of a palliative care service in our institutions. We sought to determine whether national and local efforts have led to changes in patterns of care, advanced care planning, and symptom control among children with cancer at the end of life. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study from a US tertiary level pediatric institution. Parent survey and chart review data from 119 children who died between 1997 and 2004 (follow-up cohort) were compared with 102 children who died between 1990 and 1997 (baseline cohort). RESULTS: In the follow-up cohort, hospice discussions occurred more often (76% v 54%; adjusted risk difference [RD], 22%; P < .001) and earlier (adjusted geometric mean 52 days v 28 days before death; P = .002) compared with the baseline cohort. Do-not-resuscitate orders were also documented earlier (18 v 12 days; P = .031). Deaths in the intensive care unit or other hospitals decreased significantly (RD, 16%; P = .024). Parents reported less child suffering from pain (RD, 19%; P = .018) and dyspnea (RD, 21%; P = .020). A larger proportion of parents felt more prepared during the child's last month of life (RD, 29%; P < .001) and at the time of death (RD, 24%; P = .002). CONCLUSION: Children dying of cancer are currently receiving care that is more consistent with optimal palliative care and according to parents, are experiencing less suffering. With ongoing growth of the field of hospice and palliative medicine, further advancements are likely.

Understanding of prognosis and goals of care among couples whose child died of cancer.

PURPOSE: Little is known about how couples care for the terminally ill child with cancer. We assessed both parents' understanding of prognosis and treatment goals for children with cancer and explored whether sex mediates these views. We also investigated whether discordance within couples regarding treatment goals was related to parental perception of the child's end-of-life (EOL) experience. METHODS: We surveyed mothers and fathers of children who died of cancer and were cared for at Children's Hospital (Boston, MA) and the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (Boston, MA) between 2000 and 2004. Our sample included 38 couples (response rate, 56%). RESULTS: Willingness to participate did not differ by sex. At diagnosis, fathers and mothers held a similar understanding of the child's prognosis, and 58% of couples agreed on the goal of cure. During the EOL period, a majority of fathers and mothers reported lessening suffering as the primary goal. However, within couples there was poor agreement about the primary goal of care (kappa = 0.07). When parents did not agree on the primary goal of lessening suffering, both parents were more likely to report that the child suffered significantly from cancer-directed treatment (P = .03). CONCLUSION: Though parent goals are often concurrent at diagnosis, they frequently differ during the EOL period. Parent disagreement about the goal of lessening suffering at the EOL appears to impact how parents describe their child's experience of suffering. Creating opportunities for parents to work through their goals together may lead to improvements in the child's EOL experience.