The Impact of Racial Disparities and the Social Determinants of Health on Esophageal and Gastric Cancer Outcomes.

Reducing long-standing inequities in gastric and esophageal cancers is a priority of patients, providers, and policy makers. Many social determinants of health influence risk factors for disease development, incidence, treatment, and outcomes of gastric and esophageal cancers.

Report from the Workforce on Diversity and Inclusion-The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Members' Bias Experiences.

Diversity and inclusion within The Society of Thoracic Surgeons is paramount to the growth and excellence of our specialty. As such, discussions about challenges that prevent our Society from achieving this goal are necessary. The Workforce on Diversity and Inclusion has been tasked with understanding our membership's comprehension and experience with bias, which is known to have a negative impact on those of female gender, minority race, sexual orientation status, and religious status. Bias contributes to the fact that we are far from gender parity within our Society's leadership and that we must make significant changes in order to achieve a diverse membership. Within this report, we discuss the literature regarding experience with gender- and racial/ethnic-directed implicit and explicit bias during surgical training and within the cardiothoracic surgical workforce. We also share survey results on members' experience with racial/ethnic-, gender-, and other minority demographic-directed bias.

What Constitutes Optimal Management of T1N0 Esophageal Adenocarcinoma?

PURPOSE AND DESIGN: Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) develops as a consequence of gastroesophageal reflux disease and Barrett's esophagus (BE). While combination therapy with chemotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by esophagectomy improves survival in more advanced tumors, the optimal treatment strategy for early-stage EAC is undefined. Endoscopic eradication therapy, consisting of endoscopic resection and mucosal ablation, has revolutionized therapy for superficial (T1a) EAC in BE and allows for esophageal preservation in appropriate patients at low risk for lymph node metastasis (LNM). This review critically examines the literature regarding evaluation, treatment, and outcomes in patients with T1 EAC. METHODS: The literature was queried via the PubMed database to include articles published between 1990 and 2017. Search terms were generated from the key statements "Endoscopic eradication therapy results in equivalent overall survival when compared to esophagectomy for clinical T1aN0 EAC" and "Esophagectomy provides better overall survival than endoscopic eradication therapy for cT1b EAC". Abstracts were reviewed and included according to predefined selection and exclusion criteria, and were then assessed according to the GRADE system. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: In patients with T1aN0 EAC, overall survival with endoscopic eradication therapy is equal to esophagectomy. Given the substantial risk of LNM in patients with submucosal (T1b) EAC, esophagectomy remains the standard of care for surgical candidates. In the case of inoperability or low-risk lesions, endoscopic resection may be considered adequate therapy. Chemotherapy and radiation can be offered as primary therapy for non-surgical candidates with lesions not amenable to endoscopic therapy, but does not have a clear role in the adjuvant setting after either endoscopic or surgical resection.

Defining Proficiency for The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Participants Performing Thoracoscopic Lobectomy.

BACKGROUND: Parameters defining attainment and maintenance of proficiency in thoracoscopic video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy remain unknown. To address this knowledge gap, this study investigated the institutional performance curve for VATS lobectomy by using risk-adjusted cumulative sum (Cusum) analysis. METHODS: Using The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database, the study investigators identified centers that had performed a total of 30 or more VATS lobectomies. Major morbidity, mortality, and blood transfusion were deemed primary outcomes, with expected incidence derived from risk-adjusted regression models. Acceptable and unacceptable failure rates for outcomes were set a priori according to clinical relevance and informed by regression model output. RESULTS: Between 2001 and 2016, 24,196 patients underwent VATS lobectomy at 159 centers with a median volume of 103 (range, 30 to 760). Overall rates of operative mortality, major morbidity, and transfusion were 1% (244 of 24,189), 17.1% (4,145 of 24,196), and 4% (975 of 24,196), respectively. Of the highest-volume centers (≥100 cases), 84% (65 of 77) and 82 % (63 of 77) (p = 0.48) were proficient by major morbidity standards by their 50th and 100th cases, respectively. Similarly, 92% (71 of 77) and 90% (69 of 77) (p = 0.41) of centers showed proficiency by transfusion standards by their 50th and 100th cases, respectively. Three performance patterns were observed: (1) initial and sustained proficiency, (2) crossing unacceptability thresholds with subsequent improved performance; and (3) crossing unacceptability thresholds without subsequent improved performance. CONCLUSIONS: VATS lobectomy outcomes have improved with lower mortality and transfusion rates. The majority of high-volume centers demonstrated proficiency after 50 cases; however, maintenance of proficiency is not ensured. Cusum provides a simple yet powerful tool that can trigger internal audits and performance improvement initiatives.

Disparity between recent graduates' and experienced surgeons' assessment of time to operative independence.

BACKGROUND: In cardiothoracic surgery, little data exist on the transition to operative independence. We aimed to compare current perceptions of operative autonomy of junior cardiothoracic surgeons and senior colleagues who oversee transitional years. METHODS: An anonymous online survey was sent to currently practicing North American board-certified/eligible cardiothoracic surgeons to assess reported time to operative independence and comfort with cardiothoracic operations. The χ2 test, Fisher exact test, and Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare junior surgeons' self-reported experience to the junior experience as reported by the midcareer and senior surgeons with whom they practiced. Logistic regression was performed to assess factors associated with operative independence. RESULTS: Responses from 436 completed surveys were analyzed (82 juniors and 354 midcareer/seniors). Two hundred fifty-four midcareer/senior surgeons reported on the experience of 531 junior partners. Juniors reported high immediate posttraining comfort with basic cardiac cases and moderate comfort with all other categories. Time to operative independence was significantly different between juniors' self-report and midcareer/senior reports of junior partners except for complex thoracic cases. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, senior, and not midcareer, surgeon status was independently associated with junior operative independence status for cardiac cases and for basic thoracic cases. CONCLUSIONS: Most junior surgeons perceived operative independence with basic thoracic, basic cardiac, and complex cardiac operations earlier in their surgical career than that reported by senior colleagues. Objective measures of operative independence may clarify this discrepancy. This study establishes a baseline by which to compare the effects of integrated 6-year programs on operative independence. The discrepant perceptions may have implications for how training programs prepare graduates for the transition to independent practice.

Complications After Esophagectomy Are Associated With Extremes of Body Mass Index.

BACKGROUND: Body mass index (BMI) is not routinely taken into consideration for risk stratification prior to esophagectomy. Extremes of BMI are associated with adverse surgical outcomes in a variety of surgical specialties. We assessed the relationship of BMI to outcomes after esophagectomy for cancer. METHODS: Patients in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database (2009 to 2016) who underwent elective esophagectomy for cancer were selected for analysis. Open and minimally invasive approaches were included. Complications were categorized based on the Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group recommendations. Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for confounding variables. RESULTS: We evaluated 9,389 patients grouped by BMI: underweight (<18.5 kg/m2; 3%), normal (18.5 to 24.9 kg/m2; 32%), overweight (25 to 29.9 kg/m2; 36%), obese I (30 to 34.9 kg/m2; 19%), obese II (35 to 39.9 kg/m2; 7%), and obese III (≥40 kg/m2; 3%). Most patients underwent open Ivor Lewis (33%), open transhiatal (23%), or minimally invasive Ivor Lewis (22%) approaches. The operative mortality rate was 3.4%; the frequency of complications by category ranged from 4% to 28%. On multivariable analysis, overall differences were identified among BMI categories for 7 out of 9 complication types. Underweight and obese III categories were associated with increased risk. In contrast, overweight and obese I BMI were associated with decreased risk for most complication types. CONCLUSIONS: BMI is associated with postoperative complications after esophagectomy. Postoperative risk assessment and prehabilitation regimens should be adjusted accordingly when planning an esophagectomy for a patient with very low or very high BMI.

Paragonimus kellicotti Presenting With Hemoptysis and a Left Upper Lobe Mass.

A 46-year-old man presented to the thoracic surgery clinic with a 6-month history of cough and hemoptysis refractory to treatment. Examination of specimens from repeated biopsies was nondiagnostic, so the patient underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic left upper lobe wedge resection. Pathologic examination revealed Paragonimus organisms, and the patient was prescribed praziquantel, with resolution of his symptoms. Although Paragonimus infections are common in Asia, they are rare in the United States despite P kellicotti being endemic. Clinicians should have a high index of suspicion for patients presenting with unusual lung symptoms in endemic areas to avoid prolonged evaluations with potentially unnecessary diagnostic modalities.

The National Emphysema Treatment Trial: summary and update.

Surgery for severe emphysema involves a cohort of patients who are already at risk for increased perioperative morbidity and mortality. Through the careful screening and selection process, improved intraoperative techniques and rigorous attention to postoperative care, the NETT managed to yield acceptable improvements in survival and functional outcomes in this fragile patient cohort and these benefits were sustained over the long-term. Identification of the characteristics associated with a higher risk of death has provided tangible patient selection criteria for the ongoing application of LVRS. Because the NETT was such a large-scale study, the protocols that were developed had to be standardized across several centers. This produced reliable and reproducible standards for evaluation and treatment that can be applied to the surgical treatment of emphysema. When considering these criteria, although individualized patient selection is important, only patients with upper-lobe predominant disease on chest CT and possibly those with non-upper-lobe predominant disease who also have low baseline exercise capacity are appropriate candidates for LVRS. Expectedly, questions remain regarding the exact mechanism whereby the benefits derived from LVRS are obtained. Additionally, the benefit of LVRS in patients with heterogeneous but non-upper-lobe predominant disease remains to be further elucidated. In spite of the limitations of the study, the NETT, through a tremendous coordinated effort, provided valuable outcomes data, answered the pressing questions regarding lung volume reduc-tion surgery that existed at the time, and provided valuable insight into other facets of emphysema physiology and management through direct observation. Based on the NETT findings, in November 2003, CMS published criteria for expanded coverage for LVRS to include non-high-risk patients who demonstrated either upper-lobe predominant emphysema, or non-upper-lobe predominant emphysema and low baseline exercise capacity and who met the screening guidelines.29 This study not only provided data regarding the clinical efficacy of LRVS, but it was instrumental in determining health policy guidelines for the surgical management of emphysema.