RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Elderly patients are a rapidly expanding segment of the population. Recent studies suggest that octogenarians have mortality and morbidity after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) similar to that in their younger cohort. Outcomes of CEA performed in nonagenarians have not been commonly reported; this study seeks to determine the safety of CEA in nonagenarians in general practice. STUDY DESIGN: All patients in nonfederal Connecticut hospitals undergoing CEA between 1990 and 2002 were identified using the state discharge database (Chime Inc; ). RESULTS: A total of 14,679 procedures were performed during the 12 study years. Sixty-four patients were nonagenarians (0.4%). Perioperative mortality was higher among nonagenarians (3.1%) compared with younger patients, including the 2,379 octogenarians (0.6%; p = 0.008, chi-square; odds ratio = 9.1, p = 0.006). No statistically significant difference was noted in perioperative stroke rates between nonagenarians (3.1%) and octogenarians (1.2%; p = 0.35, chi-square; odds ratio 2.3, p = 0.28). Nonagenarians had longer hospital lengths of stay (7.3 days, p < 0.0001), intensive care unit lengths of stay (1.2 days, p = 0.0013), and greater hospital charges ($17,967 +/- $1,907, p < 0.0001) than younger patients. Nonagenarians underwent operative procedures more frequently in an emergent setting (22%) compared with octogenarians (11%, p < 0.001) and had a greater percentage of symptomatic presentations (stroke: 14% versus 11%, p = 0.04; transient ischemic attack: 8% versus 5%, p = 0.04, respectively). All perioperative deaths and strokes occurred in symptomatic nonagenarians (15% versus 0%, p = 0.038; 15% versus 0%, p = 0.038; respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Carotid endarterectomy is performed in nonagenarians, as a group, with greater rates of perioperative mortality and morbidity than in younger patients, including octogenarians. But nonagenarians have a greater rate of symptomatic and emergent presentations than younger patients, which may account for their increased mortality, morbidity, length of stay, and incurred charges. Asymptomatic nonagenarians have similar outcomes after carotid endarterectomy compared with younger patients, including octogenarians, with low rates of mortality and morbidity.
Assuntos
Doenças das Artérias Carótidas/cirurgia , Endarterectomia das Carótidas/efeitos adversos , Segurança , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Connecticut , Endarterectomia das Carótidas/mortalidade , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Fatores de Risco , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Because cardiac complications may predict long-term survival after carotid endarterectomy (CEA), this study evaluates contemporary outcome, including cardiac complications, after CEA. Patients in Connecticut hospitals undergoing CEA between 1991 and 2002 were identified using the state discharge database (Chime, Inc.;
Assuntos
Endarterectomia das Carótidas/efeitos adversos , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Endarterectomia das Carótidas/tendências , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Cardiopatias/etiologia , Cardiopatias/mortalidade , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/mortalidade , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Our prior laboratory work has permitted adding a whole donor heart to a preserved recipient right heart, producing a heart-and-a-half preparation able to cope with pulmonary hypertension in the recipient. The experiments in the present study explore the feasibility of the converse operation: adding an isolated donor right heart to an entire preserved heart. METHODS: Eight adult mongrel dogs (4 donors and 4 recipients) were used in 4 transplant operations performed through a right thoracotomy without cardiopulmonary bypass (using side-biting control of recipient vessels). The donor heart underwent resection of the left atrium and left ventricle, leaving an isolated donor right heart. Blood supply to the donor right ventricle was preserved from the donor ascending aorta. Through a right thoracotomy, the donor right heart was transplanted in parallel to the native right heart of the recipient by using the following anastomoses: (1) donor superior vena cava to recipient superior vena cava (end-to-side anastomosis); (2) donor pulmonary artery to recipient pulmonary artery (end-to-side anastomosis); (3) donor ascending aorta to recipient aorta (through a great vessel [end-to-end anastomosis] to provide arterial inflow to donor coronary arteries). Animals were euthanized within 1 hour after completion of transplantation. RESULTS: Isolation of the right ventricle by excision of the left chambers was technically feasible. Transplantation without cardiopulmonary bypass was feasible in all cases. The isolated right heart beat well after transplantation in all animals, demonstrating sinus rhythm. Three of 4 animals were able to sustain good hemodynamics on support with epinephrine. Bleeding from the septum or aortic valve of the donor (now open to the pericardial space) was not problematic. Mean arterial pressure was 85 mm Hg (mean) at a right atrial pressure of 6 mm Hg (mean). In 2 animals the recipient superior vena cava was ligated to obligate upper body flow to pass through the accessory ventricle; hemodynamics were preserved under these circumstances. CONCLUSION: Transplantation of an isolated right heart is feasible. Such a technique has potential as a novel therapeutic alternative for obstructive or hypoplastic lesions of the right heart in human children.