Dose to organs at risk for total body irradiation: Single-institution data using the modulated arc total body irradiation technique.

BACKGROUND: Organs at risk (OAR) dose reporting for total body irradiation (TBI) patients is limited, and standardly reported only as mean doses to the lungs and kidneys. Consequently, dose received and effects on other OAR remain unexplored. To remedy this gap, this study reports dose data on an extensive list of OAR for patients treated at a single institution using the modulated arc total body irradiation (MATBI) technique. METHOD: An audit was undertaken of all patients treated with MATBI between January 2015 and March 2021 who had completed their course of treatment. OAR were contoured on MATBI patient treatment plans, with 12 Gy in six fraction prescription. OAR dose statistics and dose volume histogram data are reported for the whole body, lungs, kidneys, bones, brain, lens, heart, liver and bowel bag. RESULTS: The OAR dose data for 29 patients are reported. Mean dose results are body 11.77 Gy, lungs 9.86 Gy, kidneys 11.84 Gy, bones 12.03 Gy, brain 12.12 Gy, right lens 12.31 Gy, left lens 12.64 Gy, heart 11.07 Gy, liver 11.81 Gy and bowel bag 12.06 Gy. Dose statistics at 1-Gy intervals of V6-V13 for lungs and V10-V13 for kidneys are also included. CONCLUSION: This is the first time an extensive list of OAR data has been reported for any TBI technique. Due to the paucity of reporting, this information could be used by centres implementing the MATBI technique, in addition to aiding comparison between TBI techniques, with the potential for greater understanding of the relationship between dose volume data and toxicity.

An evaluation of ankle and foot bolus in paediatric modulated arc total body irradiation (MATBI).

INTRODUCTION: This retrospective planning study aimed to evaluate the role of bolus in achieving dose uniformity in the ankles and feet in paediatric patients undergoing Modulated Arc Total Body Irradiation (MATBI) treatment and to identify patient factors that may negate or warrant its use. METHODS: The clinically treated plans of 20 paediatric patients who received MATBI treatment utilising ankle and foot bolus (Bolus plan) were compared with two retrospectively generated plans; a plan with bolus removed and no re-optimisation (No Bolus plan), and a re-optimised plan without bolus attempting to achieve equal dosimetry to the clinical plan via monitor unit adjustment (MU plan). Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate the dose uniformity criteria of ±10% coverage of the reference dose (RD) for each subregion of the ankle and foot for the three plans. The impact of patient height, weight, and age at the time of treatment was evaluated using Spearman's correlation. RESULTS: Variation in doses >10% RD was minimal across the three plans, with an average D1cc difference < 0.4Gy. For the ankle and foot regions in the Bolus plans, the volume receiving at least 90% of the RD (V90) was on average > 92%. In No Bolus and MU plans, there was an average reduction of 24.5% and 23.2% V90 coverage respectively in the toes. Spearman's correlation suggests height has the strongest relationship to D1cc. CONCLUSION: This study validated the continued use of ankle and foot bolus to achieve dosimetric goals for paediatric MATBI treatments, particularly V90 coverage across all heights.

Considerations and adaptions to the modulated arc total body irradiation technique: dosimetry description.

Total body irradiation (TBI) is a complex treatment technique, which has been slow to transition to a three-dimensional (3D) planning approach. There is limited literature available providing a detailed description on methods to plan TBI on a 3D planning system. 3D planning using the modulated arc TBI (MATBI) technique is a complex process involving a significant number of quality assurance processes and scripts, due to more than 40 treatment beams and two patient positions. This article will focus on the workflow and technical planning aspects of our institution's MATBI technique and identify reasons for modifications made to the developing institution's original MATBI approach. Included is a description of specific simulation equipment, detailed explanation of the four-stage computing process including the role of scripting to standardise and streamline what is otherwise a complex number of steps. The information provided is specific to one centre's approach but shows the fundamental planning process and demonstrates a streamlined method, which can be adapted to other planning systems. Overall, the ability to accurately represent the TBI technique in 3D on a planning system will be shown.