Has the outcome for extremely low gestational age (ELGA) infants improved following recent advances in neonatal intensive care?

The objectives of this paper are to examine (a) the survival of extremely low-gestational-age (ELGA) infants born at 23-28 weeks' gestational age (GA) and (b) the neurodevelopmental outcome at 18 months corrected age for those born at 23-25 weeks' GA during 1991-1993, when antenatal steroids, surfactant, and dexamethasone for bronchopulmonary dysplasia had become accepted treatments; and to compare with an earlier (1983-1989), previously published large cohort (in a presurfactant era) from our institution. Perinatal and neonatal data on all births delivered at 23-28 weeks' GA at British Columbia's tertiary perinatal center were analyzed for survival rates by GA. Survivors of those born at 23-25 weeks' GA underwent neurodevelopmental assessment at a corrected chronological age of 18 months. The recent cohort (n = 333) of live birth infants, compared to the earlier cohort (n = 911 ) showed a trend toward an overall improved survival to discharge (72 vs. 65%, p = 0.06). Further analysis showed that improved survival was seen only in 26- to 28-week GA infants (86 vs. 76%, p = 0.01), but not in 23- to 25-week GA infants (44 vs. 44%, p = 0.9), even when adjusted for gender or twin births. In addition, the incidence of major impairment at 18 months (36% in both periods) remained high. Reanalysis of 24- to 25-week GA infants again showed no evidence of improved survival (53 vs. 50%) or improved outcome at 18 months (major handicap rate 32%; vs. 34%). Survival rates improved for 26- to 28-week GA infants, but the survival rate and incidence of major impairment had not improved for of 23- to 25-week GA infants.

Perinatal outcomes of a large cohort of extremely low gestational age infants (twenty-three to twenty-eight completed weeks of gestation).

OBJECTIVES: To determine gestational age (GA)-specific mortality rates; the effects of GA, birth weight, sex, and multiple gestation on mortality rates; short-term morbidity for infants born at 23 to 28 weeks GA; and impairment rates at a corrected chronologic age of 18 months for those born at 23 to 25 weeks GA. METHODS: A data base analysis was performed with a linked obstetric and a neonatal database. GA was determined by obstetric data and confirmed by early ultrasonography (available in 88%) on all births < 30 weeks GA at British Columbia's tertiary perinatal center from 1983 to 1989. RESULTS: Of 1024 births occurring between 23 and 28 weeks GA, 911 were live born. The mortality rate decreased with increasing GA: 84% at 23 weeks; 57% at 24 weeks; 45% at 25 weeks; 37% at 26 weeks; 23% at 27 weeks; and 13% at 28 weeks GA. For each GA, mortality rate versus birth weight plots showed a decreasing mortality rate with increasing birth weight, except for infants who were large for GA. Male infants had a higher mortality rate than female infants (odds ratio, 1.8; confidence interval, 1.4 to 2.5). Twins fared worse than singletons with a decreasing effect from 24 weeks GA (odds ratio, 10.3) to no effect at 28 weeks GA. The median number of days supported by mechanical ventilation and the length of stay in the neonatal intensive care unit decreased markedly with increasing GA. Eighteen-month outcome of survivors between 23 and 25 weeks GA with 93% follow-up rate revealed an overall impairment rate of 36%, but 6 of the 9 surviving 23-week infants had major impairments. CONCLUSIONS: The GA-specific perinatal outcome results of this large cohort provide information to assist in perinatal management decision making and for counseling parents prenatally.

Effect of delivery method on outcomes in the very low-birth weight breech infant: is the improved survival related to cesarean section or other perinatal care maneuvers?

The perinatal mortality rate among very low-birth weight infants has been decreased by 20% during the last 4 years of the 1973 to 1980 period here reported. The concurrent increase in the cesarean section rate from 11.9% to 49.1% during the same time frames has been assumed to be responsible for the improved outcome. The changes were most marked in the extremely low-birth weight group (less than 1,000 gm). The survival rates and cesarean section rates were examined among infants of similar birth weight and gestational age in the vertex presentation, in the same time frames. A similar or greater reduction in mortality rate (from 85% to 45%) was noted in the very low-birth weight vertex infants, whereas the cesarean section rate remained minimally and not significantly increased (14.2% to 22.2%). The interpretation of this finding is by no means clear but must include the hypothesis that the increased cesarean section rate may be incidental and in no way related to the improved outcome. The most statistically significant determinants of outcome remain birth weight and gestational age strata, with no significant difference in outcomes when the extremely low-birth weight group is analyzed separately from the entire very low-birth weight group. As yet unidentified perinatal care practices, other than cesarean section, may be more likely to affect outcome in this high-risk group.

The prenatal prediction of thrombocytopenia in infants of mothers with clinically diagnosed immune thrombocytopenia.

The management of the pregnant patient with immune thrombocytopenia is complicated by the unavailability of the fetal platelet count. Since the transplacental passage of antiplatelet antibodies mediates infant thrombocytopenia, measurement of maternal platelet-associated IgG might predict infant outcome. We related the maternal platelet count and platelet-associated IgG level to the infant's platelet count in 41 pregnancies in 38 patients who were clinically diagnosed as having immune thrombocytopenia. Fifteen of 39 live-born infants were thrombocytopenic at delivery. Maternal platelet-associated IgG was predictive of infant platelet count but maternal platelet count was not; only one of the 20 infants delivered of the 18 thrombocytopenic mothers with normal platelet-associated IgG was affected, whereas 11 of 12 thrombocytopenic mothers with elevated platelet-associated IgG had thrombocytopenic infants. Five infants died in utero between 18 and 28 weeks' gestation, but otherwise there was no significant morbidity in the live births. Measurement of platelet associated IgG in mothers with immune thrombocytopenia during pregnancy can be used to predict infant thrombocytopenia, although it does not predict the severity of the thrombocytopenia.

Gynecologic aspects of the "routine" checkup.

A Pap test, advice about contraception, and instruction in breast self-examination--these are important components in the routine physical checkup of female patients. The practice of office gynecology is a demanding but rewarding part of general medical practice.

Relationship between cortisol and lecithin/sphingomyelin ratios in human amniotic fluid.

Amniotic fluid was obtained from 85 women during the last trimester of gastation and analyzed for cortisol by a radioimmunoassay procedure and for lecithin/sphingomyelin (L/S) ratios by a combined thin-layer chromatography densitometer scanning technique. A total of 114 samples were examined. Cortisol values ranged from 38 to 438 ng. per milliliter; L/S ratios ranged from 0.3 to 9.2. Comparison of cortisol levels with L/S ratios by multiple regression analysis gave an "r" value of 0.371. From less than 32 weeks' gestation to 41 or 42 weeks there was an increase in cortisol levels from 139 plus or minus 124 to 290 plus or minus 78 ng. per milliliter whereas the L/S ratios increased from 1.8 plus or minus 2.3 to 3.9 plus or minus 2.0. These data indicate that there is no good correlation between cortisol and L/S ratios in the samples of amniotic fluid analyzed.

Fetal monitoring.

The severe risk situations characterized by fetal growth retardation are outlined. The small fetus, whether growth retarded or severely premature, is best delivered where both fetal monitoring and newborn resuscitation are available. The moderate risk fetus can be monitored at home base with clinical skills described in this article.The recognition of fetal intrauterine growth retardation using a simple tool (tape measure) is stressed, and the criteria for interpretation of FHR patterns are briefly reviewed, with their relationships to true fetal distress.

Perinatal death and damage: predictive and preventive considerations.

The author reviews some of the classical clinical entities which carry with them major degree of risk to the fetus and newborn. He lists systems which facilitate the identification of high risk patients on a statistical basis, and describes easily applied clinical examination techniques which may help in screening and diagnosing previously unrecognized serious problems of feto-placental malfunction.The author then discusses the more sophisticated methods of detecting and managing serious high risk pregnancies, highlighting the severe degree of risk created by the additional stress of labor, superimposed on previous chronic feto-placental malfunction.Dr. Effer concludes that the nature of the sequelae, i.e. death or brain damage, are the product of catastrophic failures; these demand that we consider all the high risk pregnancies with a great deal of respect, and develop increasing cooperative efforts to investigate and institute the already known measures which may create substantial improvement.

Management of high-risk pregnancy: report of a combined obstetrical and neonatal intensive care unit.

The methodology, equipment and personnel required to carry out an intensive-care program in the management of high-risk pregnancies have been outlined. The perinatal mortality rate has been determined and its etiology has been analyzed.There appear to be three conditions in which the degree of high risk is such as to warrant provision of the complete facilities of the service we described, viz., (a) severe pre-eclampsia; (b) marked intrauterine growth retardation with placental insufficiency as determined from serial measurements of uterine growth and estriol determinations; and (c) irreversible labour in premature pregnancies where a birth weight of 2200 g. or less is anticipated. Numerous other conditions that we have monitored have perhaps had their good outcome because of monitoring facilities. A less sophisticated and more easily applied method of monitoring should be available within the context of routine labour and delivery rooms.There is a pressing need to re-evaluate and change some of our methods of educating our undergraduate, postgraduate and practising physicians and to provide continuing education in the realm of prenatal care and recognition of high-risk pregnancy. Regionalization and centralization of this type of intensive care for high-risk pregnancies are required.Indispensable to the success of this type of project is the incorporation, without physical, emotional or intellectual barriers, of both a pediatric and an obstetrical component within the intensive-care unit.