Descent of fetal head during active pushing: secondary analysis of prospective cohort study investigating ultrasound examination before operative vaginal delivery.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate if descent of the fetal head during active pushing is associated with duration of operative vaginal delivery, mode of delivery and neonatal outcome in nulliparous women with prolonged second stage of labor. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study of nulliparous women with prolonged second stage of labor, conducted between November 2013 and July 2016 in five European countries. Fetal head descent was measured using transperineal ultrasound. Head-perineum distance (HPD) was measured between contractions and on maximum contraction during active pushing, and the difference between these values (ΔHPD) was calculated. The main outcome was duration of operative vaginal delivery, estimated using survival analysis to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) for vaginal delivery, with values > 1 indicating a shorter duration. HR was adjusted for prepregnancy body mass index, maternal age, induction of labor, augmentation with oxytocin and use of epidural analgesia. Pregnancies were grouped according to ΔHPD quartile, and delivery mode and neonatal outcome were compared between groups. RESULTS: The study population comprised 204 women. Duration of vacuum extraction was shorter with increasing ΔHPD. Estimated mean duration was 10.0, 9.0, 8.8 and 7.5 min in pregnancies with ΔHPD in the first to fourth quartiles, respectively, and the adjusted HR for vaginal delivery, using increasing ΔHPD as a continuous variable, was 1.04 (95% CI, 1.01-1.08). Mean ΔHPD was 7 mm (range, -10 to 37 mm). ΔHPD was either negative or ≤ 2 mm in the lowest quartile. In this group, 7/50 (14%) pregnancies were delivered by Cesarean section, compared with 8/154 (5%) of those with ΔHPD > 2 mm (P < 0.05). There was no significant association between umbilical artery pH < 7.10 or 5-min Apgar score < 7 and ΔHPD quartile. CONCLUSION: Minimal or no fetal head descent during active pushing was associated with longer duration of operative vaginal delivery and higher frequency of Cesarean section in nulliparous women with prolonged second stage of labor. © 2019 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

ISUOG Practice Guidelines: intrapartum ultrasound.

PURPOSE AND SCOPE: The purpose of these Guidelines is to review the published techniques of ultrasound in labor and their practical applications, to summarize the level of evidence regarding the use of ultrasound in labor and to provide guidance to practitioners on when ultrasound in labor is clinically indicated and how the sonographic findings may affect labor management. We do not imply or suggest that ultrasound in labor is a necessary standard of care.

Umbilical vein vasomotion detected in vivo by serial three-dimensional pixelwise spatially angle-corrected volume flow measurements.

OBJECTIVE: To explore changes in volume flow in the umbilical vein in healthy second-trimester fetuses. METHODS: This was a prospective observational pilot study performed at Stavanger University Hospital, Norway, between May and October 2013. Serial three-dimensional ultrasound recordings from the umbilical vein were acquired every 30 s in a 5-min period in 43 fetuses at 17-20 weeks' gestation. The recordings were analyzed with pixelwise spatially angle-corrected volume flow measurements. RESULTS: We observed variation in the umbilical vein volume flow in all fetuses, ranging from a mean minimum of 1.01 mL/s to a mean maximum of 2.60 mL/s. The minimum of all measurements was 57% compared with the mean value and the maximum was 148% of the mean value. The individual flow volume measurements ranged between 0.11 and 4.14 mL/s (mean, 1.76 mL/s). Within this range, an undulating course of all perfusion parameters was observed, with a full period of 4-5 min duration. CONCLUSION: Healthy second-trimester fetuses show cyclical variation in blood flow in the umbilical vein. Copyright © 2015 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Prediction of delivery mode by ultrasound-assessed fetal position in nulliparous women with prolonged first stage of labor.

OBJECTIVES: To ascertain if fetal head position on transabdominal ultrasound is associated with delivery by Cesarean section in nulliparous women with a prolonged first stage of labor. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study performed at Stavanger University Hospital, Norway, and Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK, between January 2012 and April 2013. Nulliparous pregnant women with a singleton cephalic presentation at term and prolonged labor had fetal head position assessed by ultrasound. The main outcome was Cesarean section vs vaginal delivery, and secondary outcomes were association of fetal head position with operative vaginal delivery and duration of remaining time in labor. RESULTS: Fetal head position was assessed successfully by ultrasound examination in 142/150 (95%) women. In total, 19/50 (38%) women with a fetus in the occiput posterior (OP) position were delivered by Cesarean section compared with 16/92 (17%) women with a fetus in a non-OP position (P = 0.01). On multivariable logistic regression analysis, the OP position predicted delivery by Cesarean section with an odds ratio (OR) of 2.9 (95% CI, 1.3-6.7; P = 0.01) and induction of labor with an OR of 2.4 (95% CI, 1.0-5.6; P = 0.05). Fetal head position was not associated with operative vaginal delivery or with remaining time in labor. The agreement between a digital and an ultrasound assessment of OP position was poor (Cohen's kappa = 0.19; P = 0.18). CONCLUSION: OP fetal head position assessed by transabdominal ultrasound was significantly associated with delivery by Cesarean section.

Sonographic assessment of fetal occiput position during the second stage of labor: how reliable is the transperineal approach?

OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy of transperineal (TP) ultrasound with transabdominal (TA) approach in the sonographic assessment of fetal occiput position during the second stage of labour. METHODS: A series of low-risk women at term attending the labour ward of three university hospitals were prospectively recruited for the purpose of this study. During the second stage of labor patients were evaluated first by TP and than by TA ultrasound to determine the fetal position. The occiput position was labelled as DOA (direct occiput anterior), ROA (right occiput anterior), LOA (left occiput anterior), DOP (direct occiput posterior), ROP (right occiput posterior), LOP (left occiput posterior), ROT (right occuput transverse) and LOT (left occiput transverse). The agreement between the two techniques was assessed. RESULTS: Overall 80 patients were recruited in the study group. Ultrasound examination was performed at 21(± 8) minutes from the beginning of the active pushing. The ultrasound findings of the fetal occiput position were recorded. In all cases TA ultrasound confirmed the fetal occiput position as determined at TP approach except in one case of ROA that had been recorded as ROT using TP ultrasound. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound TP examination is accurate in the diagnosis of fetal occiput position during the second stage of labor.

Sonographic prediction of vaginal delivery in prolonged labor: a two-center study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether head-perineum distance (HPD) measured by transperineal ultrasound is predictive of vaginal delivery and time remaining in labor in nulliparous women with prolonged first stage of labor and to compare the predictive value with that of angle of progression (AoP). METHODS: This was a prospective observational study at Stavanger University Hospital, Norway and Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK from January 2012 to April 2013, of nulliparous women with singleton pregnancies with cephalic presentation at term with prolonged first stage of labor. We used transperineal ultrasound to measure HPD (shortest distance between the outer bony limit of the fetal skull and the perineum) and AoP (angle between a line through the long axis of the symphysis and the tangent to the fetal head) and transabdominal ultrasound to classify fetal head position. The main outcomes were vaginal delivery and time remaining in labor. RESULTS: Of 150 women enrolled, 39 underwent delivery by Cesarean section. The area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve for the prediction of vaginal delivery was 81% (95% CI, 73-89%) using HPD as the test variable and 72% (95% CI, 63-82%) using AoP. HPD was ≤ 40 mm in 84 (56%) women, of whom 77 (92%; 95% CI, 84-96%) delivered vaginally. HPD was > 40 mm in the other 66 (44%) women, of whom 34 (52%; 95% CI, 40-63%) delivered vaginally. AoP was ≥ 110° in 84 of the 145 (58%) in whom this was available and, of these, 74 (88%; 95% CI, 79-93%) delivered vaginally. AoP was < 110° in the other 61 (42%) women, of whom 35 (57%; 95% CI, 45-69%) delivered vaginally. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that HPD ≤ 40 mm (odds ratio (OR), 4.92; 95% CI, 1.54-15.80), AoP ≥ 110° (OR, 3.11; 95% CI, 1.01-9.56), non-occiput posterior position (OR, 3.36; 95% CI, 1.24-9.12) and spontaneous onset of labor (OR, 4.44; 95% CI, 1.42-13.89) were independent predictors for vaginal delivery. Both ultrasound methods were predictive for the time remaining in labor. CONCLUSION: Transperineal ultrasound measurement of HPD and AoP provide important information about the likelihood of vaginal delivery and the time remaining in labor in nulliparous women with prolonged labor.

The sonopartogram: a novel method for recording progress of labor by ultrasound.

OBJECTIVES: Progress of labor has hitherto been assessed by digital vaginal examination (VE). We introduce the concept of a non-intrusive ultrasound (US)-based assessment of labor progress (the 'sonopartogram') and investigate its feasibility for assessing cervical dilatation and fetal head descent and rotation. METHODS: This was a prospective study performed in 20 women in the first stage of labor in two European maternity units. Almost simultaneous assessment of cervical dilatation and fetal head descent and rotation were made by US and digital VE. RESULTS: The total number of paired US and digital VE assessments was 52, with a median of three per woman. Overall, 5% of sonopartogram parameters were not obtained compared with 18% of conventional digital VE parameters (P < 0.001). Assessment of cervical dilatation was possible in 86.5% of US examinations and 100% of digital VEs (P = 0.02), and dilatation was assessed as being greater by digital VE than by US (mean difference, 1.16 (95% limits of agreement, -0.76, 3.08) cm, r(2) = 0.68, P = 0.01). Fetal head descent was measured in all 52 cases by both methods (r(2) = 0.33, P < 0.001), but correlation between the two was only moderate. Head rotation was obtainable in 98% of US examinations and 46% of digital VEs (P < 0.001), with a mean difference of -3.9° (95% limits of agreement, -144.1°, 136.3°). CONCLUSION: In this proof-of-concept study, the acquisition of data regarding progress of labor was more successful for the sonopartogram than the conventional partogram. The agreement between digital VE and US was good for cervical dilatation and head rotation but less so for head descent. US assessment of the progress of labor is feasible in most cases.

Occiput posterior position diagnosis: vaginal examination or intrapartum sonography? A clinical review.

The occiput posterior (OP) position is one of the most frequent malposition during labor. During the first stage of labor, the fetal head may stay in the OP position in 30% of the cases, but of these only 5-7% remains as such at time of delivery. The diagnosis of OP position in the second stage of labor is made difficult by the presence of the caput succedaneum or scalp hair, both of which may give some problem in the identification of fetal head sutures and fontanels and their location in relationship to maternal pelvic landmarks. The capability of diagnosing a fetus in OP position by digital examination has been extremely inaccurate, whereas an ultrasound approach, transabdominal, transperineal and transvaginal, has clearly shown its superior diagnostic accuracy. This is true not only for diagnosis of malpositions, detected in both first and second stage of labor, but also in cases of marked asynclitism.

Comparison between ultrasound parameters and clinical examination to assess fetal head station in labor.

OBJECTIVE: Several ultrasound parameters, including intrapartum transperineal ultrasound (ITU) head station, angle of progression (AOP), head-perineum distance (HPD) and head-symphysis distance (HSD), have been suggested to assess fetal head station during labor. The aim of this study was to analyze the relationship between these ultrasound parameters and to compare them with digital palpation. METHODS: We analyzed 106 stored volume dataset pairs that had been acquired at Stavanger University Hospital, Norway, from nulliparous women at term with prolonged first stage of labor. The volumes were acquired using a three-dimensional transducer applied between the labia majora in a mid-sagittal plane and perineally in a transverse plane. Digitally palpated head station and cervical dilatation were also noted. The results were compared using regression and correlation coefficients. RESULTS: There were good correlations between ITU head station and HPD (r = 0.71), between ITU head station and HSD (r = 0.74) and between HSD and HPD (r = 0.75). Palpated head station showed only moderate correlation with ITU head station (r = 0.52). Cervical dilatation showed a weak correlation with ITU head station (r = 0.30). CONCLUSION: The ultrasound parameters showed a high degree of correlation with each other, but only moderate correlation to vaginally palpated fetal head station.

Simple two-dimensional ultrasound technique to assess intrapartum cervical dilatation: a pilot study.

OBJECTIVES: To describe a two-dimensional (2D) ultrasound technique to measure cervical dilatation in labor, and to compare ultrasound with digital measurements. METHODS: 2D transperineal ultrasound was performed in 21 nulliparous women in labor with a singleton fetus in cephalic presentation and cervical dilatation measured before or after a digital vaginal examination. The absolute difference was calculated and Bland-Altman analysis was used to assess the mean difference between digital vaginal examination and ultrasound examination of cervical dilatation. Pearson analysis was used to determine the correlation between digital and ultrasound measurements. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) with 95% CI were used to evaluate the reliability of the two methods. RESULTS: Satisfactory quality images of the cervix were obtained in 19 of 21 cases. There was positive correlation between 2D ultrasound measurement of cervical dilatation and digital vaginal examination (Pearson coefficient r = 0.821, n = 19, P < 0.001). Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean difference between digital and ultrasound measurements of 0.08 cm (95% limits of agreement: -1.83 to 2.00) and the mean absolute difference was 1.24 cm. The ICC between the two methods was 0.81 (95% CI, 0.58-0.92). CONCLUSIONS: Assessment and measurement of cervical dilatation by 2D transperineal ultrasound is feasible, with close agreement shown between the technique and digital vaginal examination. The technique that we describe could represent an important component of a 'sonopartogram' for ultrasound assessment of labor progress.

Agreement between two- and three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound methods in assessing fetal head descent in the first stage of labor.

OBJECTIVE: To study intraobserver repeatability and intermethod agreement between two- (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) transperineal ultrasound methods in assessing fetal head descent during the first stage of labor. METHODS: Fetal head descent was measured with transperineal ultrasound as the fetal head-perineum distance and the angle of progression in 106 primiparous women with prolonged first stage of labor. A single obstetrician performed all the scans, and another obstetrician analyzed the acquired 2D images and 3D volumes, blinded to clinical assessments and labor outcome. Intraobserver repeatability and intermethod agreement between 2D and 3D methods were analyzed. RESULTS: The repeatability coefficient was ± 4.1 mm in 2D acquisitions and ± 1.7 mm in 3D acquisitions of fetal head-perineum distance. The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were 0.94 for 2D and 0.99 for 3D measurements. The angle of progression repeatability coefficients were ± 6.7° using 2D and ± 5.7° using 3D ultrasound and ICCs were 0.91 and 0.94, respectively. The intermethod ICC for fetal head-perineum distance in 2D vs 3D acquisitions was 0.95 and for angle of progression it was 0.93; the intermethod 95% limits of agreement were - 5.8 mm to + 7.2 mm and - 8.9° to + 13.7°, respectively. Cohen's kappa for 2D vs 3D acquisitions was 0.85 using 40 mm as a cut-off level for fetal head-perineum distance and 0.79 using 110° as cut-off level for angle of progression. CONCLUSIONS: For one ultrasound operator the intraobserver repeatability and agreement between 2D and 3D ultrasound methods in prolonged first stage of labor were good. Given that 2D methods are simpler to learn and can be analyzed quickly online, 2D equipment might therefore be preferred in the labor room.

Prediction of delivery mode with transperineal ultrasound in women with prolonged first stage of labor.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate if fetal head-perineum distance and angle of progression measured with two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) transperineal ultrasound could predict outcome of labor in primiparous women with prolonged first stage of labor. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study of 110 primiparous women with singleton cephalic presentation at term diagnosed with prolonged first stage of labor. Digital assessment of fetal station was related to the ischial spine. Fetal head descent was measured with transperineal ultrasound as the shortest distance from the fetal head to the perineum, and the angle between the pubic symphysis and the fetal head. Receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curves were constructed and 2D and 3D data acquisitions were compared. The stored 3D volumes were assessed by an examiner blinded to all other data. Vaginal delivery vs. Cesarean section was the primary outcome. RESULTS: Cesarean section was performed in 25% of the women. Areas under the ROC curves for prediction of vaginal delivery were 81% (95% confidence interval (CI), 71-91%) (P < 0.01) and 76% (95% CI, 66-87%) (P < 0.01) for fetal head-perineum distance and angle of progression, respectively, as measured by 2D ultrasound and 66% (95% CI, 54-79%) for digital assessment of fetal station (P = 0.01). In 50% of women fetal head-perineum distance was ≤ 40 mm and 93% (95% CI, 83-97%) of them delivered vaginally vs. 18% (95% CI, 5-48%) with distance > 50 mm. In 48% of women the angle of progression was ≥ 110° and 87% (95% CI, 75-93%) of them delivered vaginally vs. 38% (95% CI, 21-57%) with angle < 100°. Results from 2D and 3D acquisitions were similar. CONCLUSION: Fetal head-perineum distance and angle of progression measured with 2D or 3D ultrasound can predict labor outcome, with similar predictive values for the two techniques.

A new population-based term prediction model vs. two traditional sample-based models: validation on 9046 ultrasound examinations.

OBJECTIVES: To compare results of predictions of date of delivery from a new population-based model with those from two traditional regression models. METHODS: We included 9046 fetal biparietal diameter (BPD) measurements and 8776 femur length (FL) measurements from the routine ultrasound examinations at Stavanger University Hospital between 2001 and 2007. The prediction models to be validated were applied to the data, and the resulting predictions were compared with the actual time of the subsequent deliveries. The primary measure was the median bias (the difference between the true and the predicted date of delivery), calculated for each method, for the study population as a whole and for three subgroups of BPD/FL measurements. We also assessed the proportion of births within ± 14 days of the predicted day, and rates of preterm and post-term deliveries, which were regarded as secondary measures. RESULTS: For the population-based model, the median bias was -0.15 days (95% confidence interval (CI), -0.43 to 0.12) for the BPD-based, and -0.48 days (95% CI, -0.86 to -0.46) for the FL-based predictions, and both biases were stable over the inclusion ranges. The biases of the traditional regression models varied, depending on the fetal size at the time of the examination; the extremes were -3.2 and + 4.5 days for the BPD-based, and -1.0 and + 5.0 days for the FL-based predictions. CONCLUSIONS: The overall biases, as well as the biases for the subgroups, were all smaller with the population-based model than with the traditional regression models, which exhibited substantial biases in some BPD and FL subcategories. For the population-based model, the FL-based predictions were in accordance with the BPD-based predictions.

Ultrasound assessment of fetal head-perineum distance before induction of labor.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate fetal head-perineum distance measured by ultrasound imaging as a predictive factor for induction of labor, and to compare this distance with maternal factors, the Bishop score and ultrasound measurements of cervical length, cervical angle and occiput position. METHODS: The study included 275 women admitted for induction of labor. The fetal head-perineum distance was measured by transperineal ultrasound imaging as the shortest distance from the outer bony limit of the fetal skull to the skin surface of the perineum. Cervical length and angle was measured by transvaginal ultrasound examination, and fetal head position was assessed by transabdominal ultrasound imaging. The Bishop score was assessed without knowledge of ultrasound measurements. Receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curves were used for evaluation of the probability of a successful vaginal delivery. The time from induction to delivery was tested using Cox regression analysis with ultrasound measurements, parity and body mass index (BMI) as possible predictive factors. RESULTS: Areas under the ROC curve for prediction of vaginal delivery were 62% (95% CI, 52-71%) for fetal head-perineum distance (P = 0.03), 61% (95% CI, 51-71%) for cervical length (P = 0.03), 63% (95% CI, 52-74%) for cervical angle (P = 0.02), 61% (95% CI, 52-70%) for Bishop score (P = 0.03) and 60% (95% CI, 51-69%) for BMI (P = 0.05). The Cesarean delivery rate was 22% among nulliparous and 5% among parous women (P < 0.01). Parity, fetal head-perineum distance, cervical length and cervical angle were contributing factors predicting vaginal delivery within 24 h in a Cox regression model. Occiput posterior position had no significant predictive value. CONCLUSIONS: Fetal head-perineum distance measured by transperineal ultrasound examination can predict vaginal delivery after induction of labor, with a predictive value similar to that of ultrasonographically measured cervical length and the Bishop score. However, we judge none of these methods used alone to be good enough in a clinical setting.