Psychosocial distress and desire for support among inpatients with skin cancer.

BACKGROUND: Regular assessment of psychosocial distress is an important component of adequate psycho-oncological and social support in cancer patients. To date, relevant studies on skin cancer patients have primarily included individuals with melanoma. OBJECTIVES: (1) Does the need for psychosocial support vary with the type of skin cancer? (2) Do mentally distressed patients desire support? (3) From the various individuals in the treatment team, whom do patients choose as potential contact person? PATIENTS UND METHODS: Inpatients with skin cancer were asked to self-assess their psychosocial situation using the Hornheide questionnaire. In addition, they were asked about their desire for psychosocial support and the preferred potential contact person. RESULTS: The need for support among the 116 patients surveyed varied significantly depending on the diagnosis (p = 0.007). However, the direct comparison between patients with melanoma (n = 38; 32.8 %) and squamous cell carcinoma (n = 9; 7.8 %) (p = 0.724) or other types of skin cancer (n = 20; 17.2 %) (p = 0.366) revealed no such difference. The prevalence of psychosocial distress (n = 49; 42.2 %) and the desire for support (n = 20; 17.4 %) showed considerable differences. Patients primarily chose a physician (n = 14/35) or a psychologist (n = 13/35) as potential "go-to" person for their mental distress. CONCLUSIONS: Apart from psychosocial distress, the desire for support should be assessed, and patients should be provided access to additional psychosocial care options. With respect to the need for psychosocial support, it does not seem to be justified to preferentially - or even exclusively - consider melanoma patients in clinical practice and research.

Psychosocial burden and desire for support in outpatients with skin cancer.

BACKGROUND: An important basis for adequate psycho-oncological and psychosocial care of cancer patients is the regular assessment of their psychosocial distress and thus their need for care. For this purpose, there are numerous questionnaires available. The objective of the present study was to assess whether distressed patients require professional support and which screening instrument outpatients with skin cancer prefer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a cross-sectional survey, we asked outpatients with skin cancer to fill out three questionnaires assessing psychosocial stress, and to indicate which one they considered most adequate. Patients were offered the following three instruments: Hornheide Questionnaire (27 items), Hornheide Screening Instrument (7 items), and the Distress Thermometer. In addition, we inquired about the patients' desire for support. RESULTS: (1) Comparing subjective distress and patients' declared desire for support revealed a marked divergence. While one-third of the 137 patients were identified as being in need of care, only 11.5% of the sample requested such support. (2) 63.7% of patients chose the long version of the Hornheide Questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to their psychosocial burden, patients' desire for support should be assessed. Moreover, apart from screening tools, other ways to provide access to psychosocial care should be considered.