Clinical challenges in the treatment of a patient with decompensated heart failure and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency (G6PDd).

We present a case of a man in his 60s, known with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency (G6PDd) and cor pulmonale, admitted to the department of cardiology due to cardiac decompensation and anaemia. The main complaint was dyspnoea. Echocardiography confirmed severe cor pulmonale with compression of the left ventricle. G6PDd has been linked with pulmonary hypertension which could contribute to aforementioned echocardiographic findings. Diuretics are the first line of treatment when it comes to cardiac decompensation, but sulfonamide diuretics can induce or exacerbate haemolysis in patients with G6PDd. Due to the respiratory distress of the patient, a treatment plan including sulfonamide diuretics was initiated in collaboration with the haematologists. Unfortunately, the patient died 2 days after admission. This case emphasises that not all cardiac patients can tolerate standard treatment with sulfonamide diuretics; despite this, they remain essential in the acute setting, and they are associated with foreseeable but only partly manageable complications in susceptible patients.

Comparison of international guideline recommendations for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.

Pulmonary embolism is one of the leading causes of death due to cardiovascular disease. Timely diagnosis is crucial, but challenging, as the clinical presentation of pulmonary embolism is unspecific and easily mistaken for other common medical emergencies. Clinical prediction rules and D-dimer measurement allow stratification of patients into groups of expected prevalence and are key elements in adequate selection of patients for diagnostic imaging; however, the strengths and weaknesses of the multiple proposed prediction rules, when to measure D-dimer, and which cutoff to apply might be elusive to a significant proportion of physicians. 13 international guidelines authored by medical societies or expert author groups provide recommendations on facets of the diagnostic investigations in suspected pulmonary embolism, some of which are hallmarked by pronounced heterogeneity. This Review summarises key recommendations of each guideline, considers the most recent evidence on the topic, compares guideline recommendations on each facet of the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism, and provides a synthesis on the most common recommendations.

Multiorgan ultrasonographic findings in patients with pulmonary embolism at diagnosis and clinical follow-up: a proof of concept study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this descriptive feasibility study was to assess the clinical impact and feasibility of conducting a multiorgan ultrasound examination of patients with pulmonary embolism at both time of diagnosis and at clinical follow-up. METHODS: Hemodynamically stable patients with pulmonary embolism verified by CT pulmonary angiography or ventilation perfusion scintigraphy were eligible for inclusion. Enrolled patients underwent multiorgan ultrasound investigation encompassing echocardiography supplemented with focused lung and deep venous ultrasound emphasizing right ventricular strain, subpleural consolidations and presence of deep venous thrombi. Identical investigations were conducted at 3 months follow-up. The presence of ultrasonographic findings at diagnosis and follow-up was compared and the clinical impact of any remaining pathology or strain was described. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were enrolled in the study of whom 20 survived to attend follow-up. Mean age was 62 ± 15 years and 48% were female. At diagnosis, the most prevalent ultrasonographic findings were subpleural consolidations in 11 patients and right ventricular dilation in eight. At follow-up, signs of right ventricular strain had resolved in all patients. However, in one patient, no resolution was seen in a subpleural consolidation observed at the time of pulmonary embolism diagnosis, resulting in referral to a chest CT. Additionally, one patient exhibited residual deep venous thrombotic material, leading to prolongation of anticoagulative treatment. CONCLUSION: In patients with pulmonary embolism, multiorgan ultrasound is feasible in follow-up and adequately powered studies should determine the clinical utility of such an approach.

Diagnostic Accuracy of a Bespoke Multiorgan Ultrasound Approach in Suspected Pulmonary Embolism.

Purpose The aims of this study were to prospectively assess the diagnostic accuracy of a bespoke multiorgan point-of-care ultrasound approach for suspected pulmonary embolism and evaluate if this model allows reduced referral to further radiation diagnostics while maintaining safety standards. Materials and Methods Patients with suspected pulmonary embolism referred for CT pulmonary angiography or ventilation/perfusion scintigraphy were included as a convenience sample. All patients were subject to blinded ultrasound investigation with cardiac, lung, and deep venous ultrasound. The sensitivity and specificity of applied ultrasound signs and the hypothetical reduction in the need for further diagnostic workup were calculated. Results 75 patients were prospectively enrolled. The Wells score was below 2 in 48 patients, between 2 and 6 in 24 patients, and above 6 in 3 patients. The prevalence of pulmonary embolism was 28%. The most notable ultrasound signs were presence of a deep venous thrombus, at least two hypoechoic pleural-based lesions, the D-sign, the 60/60-sign, and a visible right ventricular thrombus which all had a specificity of 100%. Additionally, a multiorgan ultrasound investigation with no findings compatible with pulmonary embolism yielded a sensitivity of 95.2% (95%CI: 76.2-99.9). CT or scintigraphy could be safely avoided in 70% of cases (95%CI: 63.0-83.1%). Conclusion The findings of our study suggest that implementation of a multiorgan ultrasound assessment in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism may safely reduce the need for CT or scintigraphy by confirming or dismissing the suspicion.

[Rapid and secure exclusion of myocardial infarctionwithout ST-segment elevation].

Rapid identification of acute myocardial infarction (MI) is important for the early initiation of evidence-based therapy. In the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 0/1h-algorithm (also called early-rule-out algorithm) high-sentivity cardiac troponin is measured at admission and one hour later. By using assay-specific cut-off levels patients are triaged to three different groups; "rule-out", "observation" or "rule-in" of acute MI. The ESC 0/1h-algorithm has high diagnostic accuracy and safety to rule out MI. This review summaries the current knowledge and practical use of the new early-rule-out algorithm.

Risk of Myocardial Infarction and Death After Noncardiac Surgery Performed Within the First Year After Coronary Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation for Acute Coronary Syndrome or Stable Angina Pectoris.

This study aimed to examine the 30-day risk of myocardial infarction (MI) and death in patients who underwent noncardiac surgery within 1 year after coronary drug-eluting stent implantation for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or stable angina pectoris (SAP) and to compare it with the risk in surgical patients without known coronary artery disease. Patients with drug-eluting stent implantation for ACS (n = 2,291) or SAP (n = 1,804) who underwent noncardiac surgery were compared with a cohort from the general population without known coronary artery disease matched on the surgical procedure, hospital contact type, gender, and age. In patients with ACS, the 30-day MI risk was markedly increased when surgery was performed within 1 month after stenting (10% vs 0.8%; adjusted odds ratio [ORadj] 20.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 8.85 to 45.6), whereas mortality was comparable (10% vs 8%, ORadj 1.17, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.79). When surgery was performed between 1 and 12 months after stenting, the 30-day absolute risk for MI was low but higher than in the comparison cohort (0.6% vs 0.2%, ORadj 2.18, 95% CI 0.89 to 5.38), whereas the mortality risks were similar (2.0% vs 1.8%, ORadj 1.03, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.55). In patients with SAP, the 30-day MI risk was low but higher than in the comparison cohort (0.4% vs 0.2%, ORadj 1.90, 95% CI 0.70 to 5.14), whereas the mortality risks were similar (2.2% vs 2.1%, ORadj 0.91, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.37). In conclusion, patients with ACS and SAP who underwent surgery between 1 and 12 months after stent implantation had a risk for MI and death that was similar to the risk observed in surgical patients without coronary artery disease.

Validation of the European Society of Cardiology and European Society of Anaesthesiology non-cardiac surgery risk score in patients treated with coronary drug-eluting stent implantation.

Aims: The current guidelines from the European Society of Cardiology and European Society of Anaesthesiology on non-cardiac surgery (ESC/ESA-NCS) divide surgical procedures into those associated with low risk (<1%), intermediate risk (1-5%), and high risk (>5%) of major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Evaluating surgical risk might be particularly appropriate in patients with recent stent implantation, and thus we validated the ESC/ESA-NCS classification in patients undergoing NCS within 1 year after coronary drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. Methods and results: By record-linking the Western Denmark Heart Registry and the Danish National Patient Registry, we identified 4046 patients, who underwent NCS between 1 and 12 months after DES implantation. Primary outcomes were MACE [cardiac death and myocardial infarction (MI)] and a combined endpoint of mortality and MI within 30 days after surgery. Both MACE (low risk 0.6%, intermediate risk 1.2%, and high risk 3.4%) and the combined endpoint of mortality and MI (1.5%, 4.6%, and 14.9%) were associated with the ESC/ESA-NCS classification. As compared with low-risk surgery, the odds ratios (OR) for MACE were 1.9 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.9-4.1] for intermediate-risk surgery and 5.8 (95% CI 1.7-20.1) for high-risk surgery. For the combined endpoint of mortality and MI, the OR's were 3.1 (95% CI 2.1-4.7) for intermediate-risk surgery and 11.3 (95% CI 5.9-21.9) for high-risk surgery. Conclusion: The ESC/ESA-NCS classification is a valid tool to predict the risk of both MACE and the combined endpoint of mortality and MI for patients undergoing NCS.

Coronary stent implantation and adverse cardiac events after surgery.

BACKGROUND: In the risk assessment of patients considered for non-cardiac surgery and with recent coronary stent implantation, coronary drug-eluting stent implantation procedure characteristics may be taken into account. We aimed to evaluate associations between coronary drug-eluting stent implantation procedure characteristics and the risk of myocardial infarction and all-cause death within 30 days after non-cardiac surgery. DESIGN: Patients with coronary drug-eluting stents were identified using the Western Denmark Heart Registry. Surgical procedures performed after stent implantation were detected using the Danish National Patient Registry. We used registry-based detection of myocardial infarction and all-cause death. RESULTS: Of 22 590 patients treated with drug-eluting stents between 2005 and 2012, 4046 underwent non-cardiac surgery within 1 and 12 months after stent implantation. We found no significant association between the risk of myocardial infarction or all-cause death within 30 days after surgery and number of arteries treated (1 [reference] vs more), number of lesions treated (1 [reference] vs more), segments treated (left main and proximal left anterior descending artery vs other [reference]), total stent length (<20 mm [reference] vs ≥20 mm), number of stents (1 [reference] vs >1) and largest balloon diameter (≥3 mm [reference] vs <3 mm). All-cause death, but not myocardial infarction, risk was lower among patients treated with first-generation vs second-generation stents (odds ratio 0.58). CONCLUSIONS: We identified no significant associations between stent implantation procedure characteristics and risk of myocardial infarction or all-cause death among patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. All-cause death was lower with first- vs second-generation drug-eluting stents.

Coronary artery disease and risk of adverse cardiac events and stroke.

BACKGROUND: Patients with acute myocardial infarction are at increased risk of ischaemic stroke. Previous myocardial infarction is an important part of risk assessment for ischaemic stroke. However, there is a lack of information regarding the association between the severity and extent of coronary artery disease and long-term risk of ischaemic stroke. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cohort study of coronary angiographies performed in western Denmark from 1 January 2003 to 31 December 2012. Patients were stratified according to the number of vessels affected by obstructive coronary artery disease (lumen narrowing ≥50%) at the time of angiography: zero-, one-, two- or three-vessel disease and diffuse vessel disease. We followed patients for a maximum of 7 years. Endpoints were all-cause death, cardiac death, myocardial infarction and ischaemic stroke. Cumulative risks and crude and adjusted rate ratios were estimated. RESULTS: The study population included 78 195 patients. Of these, 32 061 (41·0%) had zero-vessel disease, 6205 (7·9%) had diffuse vessel disease, 20 202 (25·8%) had one-vessel disease, 10 675 (13·7%) had two-vessel disease, and 9038 (11·6%) had three-vessel disease. Median follow-up was 3·6 years (interquartile range 1·7-6·0 years). Increasing severity of obstructive coronary artery disease was associated with an increasing risk of all-cause death, cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI) and ischaemic stroke during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The presence and extent of coronary artery disease was associated with an incremental risk of not only death, cardiac death, myocardial infarction, but also ischaemic stroke over a 7-year period.

Patients With Diabetes Without Significant Angiographic Coronary Artery Disease Have the Same Risk of Myocardial Infarction as Patients Without Diabetes in a Real-World Population Receiving Appropriate Prophylactic Treatment.

OBJECTIVE: The risk of myocardial infarction (MI) in patients with diabetes is greater than for patients without diabetes. Consequently, prophylactic treatment is recommended for patients with diabetes and risk factors for ischemic heart disease. We aimed to estimate the risk of adverse cardiac events in patients with and without diabetes with and without coronary artery disease (CAD) after coronary angiography (CAG). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A population-based cohort of patients registered in the Western Denmark Heart Registry who underwent CAG between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2012 was stratified according to the presence or absence of obstructive CAD and diabetes. End points were death, cardiac death, and MI. Unadjusted and adjusted rate ratios (RRs) were calculated by using patients without diabetes and without CAD as the reference group. RESULTS: We included 93,866 patients of whom 12,544 (13.4%) had diabetes at the time of CAG. Median follow-up was 4.1 years. Patients with and without diabetes without obstructive CAD had the same adjusted risk of death (RR 1.03 [95% CI 0.92-1.15]), cardiac death (RR 1.21 [95% CI 0.90-1.64]), and MI (RR 0.88 [95% CI 0.65-1.17]). Patients with diabetes without CAD were more often treated with statins (75.3% vs. 46.0%) and aspirin (65.7% vs. 52.7%) than patients without diabetes and CAD. CONCLUSIONS: In a real-world population, patients with diabetes with high rates of statin and aspirin treatment had the same risk of cardiovascular events as patients without diabetes in the absence of angiographically significant CAD.

Risk Associated With Surgery Within 12 Months After Coronary Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend postponing surgery for at least 6 months after treatment with a drug-eluting stent by percutaneous coronary intervention (DES-PCI). OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to evaluate the surgical risk associated with DES-PCI compared with that in nonstented patients without ischemic heart disease (IHD). METHODS: Between 2005 and 2012, a total of 22,590 patients underwent DES-PCI in western Denmark. By record-linking the Western Denmark Heart Registry and the Danish National Patient Register, we evaluated 4,303 DES-PCI-treated patients with a surgical procedure and compared them with a control group of patients without previous IHD undergoing similar surgical procedures (n = 20,232). Events of interest were myocardial infarction (MI), cardiac death, and all-cause mortality within 30 days after surgery. RESULTS: Surgery in DES-PCI-treated patients was associated with an increased risk of MI (1.6% vs. 0.2%; odds ratio [OR]: 4.82; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.25 to 7.16) and cardiac death (1.0% vs. 0.2%; OR: 5.87; 95% CI: 3.60 to 9.58) but not all-cause mortality (3.1% vs. 2.7%; OR: 1.12; 95% CI: 0.91 to 1.38). When stratified for time from PCI to surgery, only surgery within the first month was associated with a significant increased risk of events. CONCLUSIONS: Patients requiring surgery within 12 months after DES-PCI had an increased risk of MI and cardiac death compared with patients without IHD. The increased risk was only present within the first month after DES-PCI, suggesting that surgery might be undertaken earlier than currently recommended.

Evaluation of algorithms for registry-based detection of acute myocardial infarction following percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: Registry-based monitoring of the safety and efficacy of interventions in patients with ischemic heart disease requires validated algorithms. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate algorithms to identify acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the Danish National Patient Registry following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: Patients enrolled in clinical drug-eluting stent studies at the Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark, from January 2006 to August 2012 were included. These patients were evaluated for ischemic events, including AMI, during follow-up using an end point committee adjudication of AMI as reference standard. RESULTS: Of 5,719 included patients, 285 patients suffered AMI within a mean follow-up time of 3 years after stent implantation. An AMI discharge diagnosis (primary or secondary) from any acute or elective admission had a sensitivity of 95%, a specificity of 93%, and a positive predictive value of 42%. Restriction to acute admissions decreased the sensitivity to 94% but increased the specificity to 98% and the positive predictive value to 73%. Further restriction to include only AMI as primary diagnosis from acute admissions decreased the sensitivity further to 82%, but increased the specificity to 99% and the positive predictive value to 81%. Restriction to patients admitted to hospitals with a coronary angiography catheterization laboratory increased the positive predictive value to 87%. CONCLUSION: Algorithms utilizing additional information from the Danish National Patient Registry yield different sensitivities, specificities, and predictive values in registry-based detection of AMI following PCI. We were able to identify AMI following PCI with moderate-to-high validity. However, the choice of algorithm will depend on the specific study purpose.

Staged re-evaluation of non-culprit lesions in ST segment elevation myocardial infarction: a retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: It remains unknown whether complete revascularisation is optimally performed in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) during the index or at staged procedures. The aims of this study were to quantify the number of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedures in which non-culprit lesions needed further evaluation, to determine the consequence of the re-evaluation and to quantify adverse cardiac events during the waiting time for re-evaluation and intervention. METHODS: The study was observational and retrospective and included all patients with STEMI treated with primary PCI during 1 year at our centre. RESULTS: Among the 507 patients with STEMI, 374 were considered sufficiently treated with culprit lesion PCI only. Complete primary multivessel revascularisation was performed in 11 patients. Non-culprit lesion re-evaluation was planned for 122 patients (24%). Of these 122 patients, 3 patients died during their index admission. Follow-up data were not available for 3 patients. Among the 116 patients, 187 non-culprit lesions were re-evaluated and 77 patients (66.4%) underwent revascularisation with treatment of 119 lesions (63.3%). Re-evaluation was performed after a median of 30 days (25th centile: 9 days, 75th centile: 35 days). During the waiting time for re-evaluation, two patients underwent a new primary PCI due to stent thrombosis of the index culprit lesion. CONCLUSIONS: Staged re-evaluation of non-culprit lesions observed in patients with STEMI was required in 24% of a primary PCI cohort. Intervention was performed in 66.4% of patients scheduled for re-evaluation. We observed no adverse events related to the non-culprit lesions during the waiting time for a staged re-evaluation or intervention.

Gastroscopy-related adverse cardiac events and bleeding complications among patients treated with coronary stents and dual antiplatelet therapy.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is recommended following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stent (DES). DAPT is a risk factor for gastrointestinal bleeding. We aimed to quantify (1) the rate of gastroscopy within 12 months after PCI, (2) the rate of adverse cardiac events and gastroscopy-related bleeding complications within 30 days of gastroscopy, and (3) the association between antiplatelet therapy and these events. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients receiving gastroscopy within 12 months of PCI were identified and two nested case-control analyses were performed within the PCI cohort by linking Danish medical registries. Cases were patients with adverse cardiac events (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis) or hemostatic intervention. In both studies, controls were patients with gastroscopy including biopsy without adverse cardiac events and hemostatic intervention, respectively. Medical records were reviewed to obtain information on exposure to DAPT. RESULTS: We identified 22 654 PCI patients of whom 1497 patients (6.6 %) underwent gastroscopy. Twenty-two patients (1.5 %) suffered an adverse cardiac event, 93 patients (6.2 %) received hemostatic intervention during or within 30 days of the index gastroscopy. Interrupting DAPT was associated with a 3.46 times higher risk of adverse cardiac events (95 %CI 0.49 - 24.7). Discontinuation of one antiplatelet agent did not increase the risk (OR 0.65, 95 %CI 0.17 - 2.47). No hemostatic interventions were caused by endoscopic complications. CONCLUSION: Gastroscopy can be safely performed in PCI patients treated with DES and single antiplatelet therapy while interruption of DAPT may be associated with an increased risk of adverse cardiac events.

Dual anti-platelet therapy after coronary drug-eluting stent implantation and surgery-associated major adverse events.

Surgery may necessitate interruption of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) within the first year after coronary drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. We conducted a population-based cohort study to assess the rate of surgery within the first year after DES implantation, surgery-associated major adverse cardiac events (MACE), reoperation for bleeding within 30 days after surgery, and two nested case-control analyses to explore any association between preoperative antiplatelet therapy, MACE, and reoperation for bleeding. In the cohort of 22,654 patients treated with DES, 1,944 patients (8.6 %) underwent moderate- to high-risk surgery within 12 months. Of these, 62 (3.2 %) experienced MACE and 54 (2.8 %) needed reoperation for bleeding within 30 days. In the nested case-control analyses of 458 cases and controls, where 70 % (n=324) had a first generation DES, absence of preoperative antiplatelet therapy was associated with an increased MACE rate (OR 2.36, 95 % CI 1.02-5.48) compared to single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) or DAPT. Preoperative SAPT versus DAPT showed no difference in MACE rates (OR 0.85, 95 % CI 0.30-2.40). Surgery within the first month was associated with increased MACE rate (OR 4.67, 95 % CI 2.22-9.83) compared to surgery 2-12 months after DES implantation. Absence of preoperative antiplatelet therapy did not reduce reoperation for bleeding as compared to patients on SAPT or DAPT (OR 1.32, 95 % CI 0.56-3.12). In conclusion, absence of preoperative antiplatelet therapy and surgery within the first month after DES implantation were associated with increased MACE rates.

Drug-Induced Rhabdomyolysis with Elevated Cardiac Troponin T.

The essential role of cardiac troponin in the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction has led to the development of high-sensitivity assays, which are able to detect very small amounts of myocardial necrosis. The high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T assay, however, is not entirely specific for myocardial injury. This case report describes a 48-year-old woman, who, two years after cardiac transplantation, presented with rhabdomyolysis. During the course of the disease, her troponin T level was elevated on repeated occasions, but other definitive evidence of myocardial injury was not found. Asymptomatic cardiac troponin T elevations during rhabdomyolysis may be due to either cardiac involvement or false positive results stemming from skeletal muscle injury.

[Clinical considerations in the interpretation of elevated troponin levels]. / Kliniske overvejelser ved forhøjede troponinværdier.

The essential role of cardiac troponin (cTn) in the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction has led to the development of high-sensitivity assays, which are able to detect very small amounts of myocardial necrosis. However, although elevated blood levels of cTn indicate myocardial injury, they do not provide a causal explanation. The differential diagnosis of minor elevations of the cTn-level is broad and includes both acute and chronic cardiac and non-cardiac conditions. The purpose of this paper is to review common causes of elevated cTn-levels in daily clinical practice.