Severe Neuro-COVID is associated with peripheral immune signatures, autoimmunity and neurodegeneration: a prospective cross-sectional study.

Growing evidence links COVID-19 with acute and long-term neurological dysfunction. However, the pathophysiological mechanisms resulting in central nervous system involvement remain unclear, posing both diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Here we show outcomes of a cross-sectional clinical study (NCT04472013) including clinical and imaging data and corresponding multidimensional characterization of immune mediators in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and plasma of patients belonging to different Neuro-COVID severity classes. The most prominent signs of severe Neuro-COVID are blood-brain barrier (BBB) impairment, elevated microglia activation markers and a polyclonal B cell response targeting self-antigens and non-self-antigens. COVID-19 patients show decreased regional brain volumes associating with specific CSF parameters, however, COVID-19 patients characterized by plasma cytokine storm are presenting with a non-inflammatory CSF profile. Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome strongly associates with a distinctive set of CSF and plasma mediators. Collectively, we identify several potentially actionable targets to prevent or intervene with the neurological consequences of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

[Radical nephrectomy and partial nephrectomy]. / Radikale Nephrektomie und Nierenteilentfernung.

Renal cell carcinoma is the 2nd most frequent urological malignancy in women and the third most frequent in men, with an age peak in the seventh decade of life. If detected early in a local non-metastatic stage, options for complete recovery are excellent. While two decades ago, even locally limited cancers of the kidney were cured by radical nephrectomy, treatment today mostly consists of local treatment for locally confined cancers. Guidelines today recommend local surgical excision (open or minimally-invasive) or - in selected cases - topical energy application (radio-frequency ablation, cryoablation). The surgeon's expertise is most important in the selection of the appropriate kind of surgery and different guidelines have slightly different recommendations.Treatment decisions should be made on an individual basis in due consideration of an individual's age and co-morbidities. This may lead to the recommendation that, due to low perioperative morbidity, even localised carcinomas should be treated by (minimally-invasive) radical nephrectomy instead of nephron-sparing surgery and, in other cases, a non-interventional, active surveillance strategy may be pursued without compromising the patient's life expectancy. For higher-grade renal cell carcinomas, there is usually an indication for radical nephrectomy, as long as no metastases are detected. This also applies to carcinomas with venous thrombi extending into the atrium of the heart. Complications in the treatment of renal carcinomas are usually rare and easily treatable in most cases.