Biphasic effect of epinephrine on blood glucose during hyperinsulinemia in borderline hypertensive young men.

We aimed to study the glycemic response to epinephrine during hyperinsulinemia and infused epinephrine (0.03 microg/kg/min) for 30 min after 90 min of hyperinsulinemic glucose clamp in 14 borderline hypertensive young men. Plasma epinephrine was increased from 0.34 +/- 0.08 to 2.33 +/- 0.33 nmol/L while insulin and glucose infusions were kept constant with consequent changes in blood glucose. Initially (90 to 95 min), there was a decrease in blood glucose (P = .016) that correlated negatively with glucose disposal rate corrected for insulin (r = -0.55, P = .040) and positively with fasting insulin (r = 0.55). Thereafter, there was an increase in blood glucose (95 to 120 min) (P < .001) that persisted during the recovery period (120 to 140 min). The glucose increase (90 to 140 min) correlated positively with fasting insulin (r = 0.55), systolic blood pressure (r = 0.57), delta epinephrine 90 to 120 min (r = 0.59), and baseline epinephrine (r = 0.57). Blood glucose remained unchanged (P = .207) in a saline control group (n = 6) with a significant group X treatment effect versus epinephrine (P = .003). Thus, epinephrine caused a biphasic response in blood glucose during hyperinsulinemia. The initial dip in glucose was more pronounced with higher insulin sensitivity, corresponding to previous observations during mental stress test. The following increment in blood glucose was positively related to insulin, systolic blood pressure, and epinephrine levels. These data suggest that insulin may modify the glycemic response to epinephrine in a potentially favorable direction and indicate some lag time before epinephrine gains effect. Subjects who are insulin sensitive and have low blood pressure and resting epinephrine levels seem to be less prone to hyperglycemia induced by epinephrine.

Gender specific sympathetic and hemorrheological responses to mental stress in healthy young subjects.

OBJECTIVE: Activation of the sympathetic nervous system may increase hematocrit (Hct), whole blood viscosity (WBV), and possibly cardiovascular risk. The aim was to study gender specific differences of mental stress on sympathetic reactivity and blood rheology. METHODS: Responses in blood pressure, heart rate (HR), Hct, WBV (Bohlin rotational viscosimeter), and plasma catecholamines to a mental arithmetic stress test (MST) were measured in male (n = 10, 23 +/- 3 years, BMI 23 +/- 2 kg/m2) and female (n = 10, 21 +/- 4 years, BMI 24 +/- 2 kg/m2) students. RESULTS: Systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and HR increased during MST in men and women, and declined to baseline levels after 15 min of recovery. In men, plasma adrenaline increased by 217% during MST (p < 0.01, ANOVA). and plasma noradrenaline increased by 68% (p < 0.05). Hct and WBV at low shear rates (0.5 and 1.1 l/s) increased as well (p < 0.001, p < 0.05, and p < 0.05, respectively). In women, the increase in plasma adrenaline averaged 118% during MST (p < 0.05) while plasma noradrenaline (-3%, p = 0.38), Hct, and WBV at all shear rates remained unchanged. Men and women differed in A adrenaline (p < 0.05), A noradrenaline (p = 0.01), delta Hct (p < 0.05), and delta WBV (p < 0.05). A Hct tended to correlate with delta SBP (r= 0.60, p = 0.07), A DBP (r = 0.57. p = 0.09). and delta HR (r = 0.50, p = 0.14), and correlated significantly with A noradrenaline (r = 0.66, p < 0.05) in men only. Multiple regression analysis showed that gender independently explained 22% of the change in Hct during mental stress. CONCLUSION: Data suggest gender specific differences in sympathetic and hemorrheological responses to mental stress in healthy young subjects. In men, sympathetic responses were related to hemorrheological responses, but not in women. It may be speculated whether such differences in stress responses may contribute to lower cardiovascular risk in premenopausal women than in men.

Effects of hyperinsulinemia on sympathetic responses to mental stress.

In a recent study, we could not find evidence to support the hypothesis that insulin activates the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) during a hyperinsulinemic glucose clamp procedure. Mental stress tests (MST), however, may be used to detect differences in blood pressure and SNS activity that are not present during baseline or resting conditions. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effects of hyperinsulinemia during glucose clamp on blood pressure and sympathetic responses to mental stress. Borderline hypertensive but otherwise healthy 21-year-old men (n = 18) underwent 5 min of mental arithmetic stress testing (MST-1) before and at the end of 120 min of isoglycemic hyperinsulinemic glucose clamp (MST-2) with infusion rates of glucose and insulin kept constant. Insulin concentration increased from 119 +/- 10 pmol/L to 752 +/- 65 pmol/L. We observed highly significant increases in blood pressure and heart rate in response to MST, but neither insulin nor saline solution infusions affected these responses. During MST-1, norepinephrine increased by 461 +/-165 pmol/L (mean +/- SEM) and epinephrine by 218 +/- 76 pmol/L. During MST-2 the changes were 372 +/- 112 pmol/L and 187 +/- 60 pmol/L, respectively. The norepinephrine (P = .8) and epinephrine (P = .7) responses were unchanged by insulin. Thus, there were similar increases in blood pressure, heart rate, and plasma catecholamine concentrations in arterialized venous blood in response to MST despite the infusion of insulin. A possible time effect was excluded by including a saline solution control group (n = 7) that showed almost identical results. Our results suggest that acute hyperinsulinemia during isoglycemic glucose clamp does not interfere with cardiovascular or sympathetic responses to mental stress.

Increased forearm blood flow during glucose clamp is related neither to insulin sensitivity nor to hyperinsulinemia in borderline hypertensive young men.

It is controversial whether raised insulin within the physiological concentration range increases forearm blood flow (FBF). The aim of the present study was therefore to examine the effect of the isoglycemic hyperinsulinemic glucose clamp procedure on FBF and to relate the increase to the glucose disposal rate (GDR), i.e. insulin sensitivity. Borderline hypertensive young men were examined with the clamp technique or received saline infusion, and FBF was measured using plethysmography. It is of particular interest to study this group of subjects because their GDR correlates to a number of metabolic and hemodynamic variables, and these subjects hyperreact to stressful stimuli. There was no correlation between deltaFBF during clamp and GDR (r = -0.002, p = 0.99, n = 28). While serum insulin increased from 107 +/- 5 to 628 +/- 31 pmol/l in the hyperinsulinemic group and remained unchanged (135 +/- 11 vs 116 +/- 11 pmol/l) in the saline group, FBF increased from 3.5 +/- 0.3 to a maximum of 5.1 +/- 0.4 ml/min/100 ml (p < 0.001, n = 28) and from 2.8 +/- 0.5 to a maximum of 4.5 +/- 0.5 ml/min/100 ml (p = 0.01, n = 8), respectively. The increase in FBF (delta%) was similar in the two groups (p = 0.9). Thus, we could not demonstrate any relationship between insulin sensitivity and increments in FBF during hyperinsulinemic glucose clamp in borderline hypertensive young men. The moderate increases in FBF during insulin infusion with serum concentrations within the physiological range seem to be time-dependent and not caused by hyperinsulinemia.

Insulin modifies the glucose response to mental stress independently of forearm blood flow.

In the present study we aimed to reproduce and extend our recent finding that insulin infusion modifies the glucose response to mental stress and to determine whether the altered glucose response, i.e. glucose uptake, may be explained by a rise in forearm blood flow (FBF). The subjects were borderline hypertensive; there was one former blood pressure measurement > or =140/90 mm Hg, but otherwise they were healthy 21-year-old men. In the first series (n = 18) the subjects were exposed to a 5-min mental arithmetic stress test prior to (MST-1) and at the end of (MST-2) 120 min of hyperinsulinemic glucose clamp. Blood glucose was unchanged (0.067+/-0.05 mmol/l, p = 0.24) during MST-1 and decreased (-0.37+/-0.09 mmol/l, p = 0.001) during MST-2. Blood glucose also decreased in a second series (n = 28) in which the subjects were exposed to MST after 120 min of glucose clamp (-0.33+/-0.09 mmol/l , p = 0.001), and FBF increased from 4.4+/-0.4 to 7.7+/-1.1 ml/min/100 ml (p<0.0001). Glucose was unchanged (p = 0.48) in response to MST in a saline time control group (n = 8). However, FBF increased in response to MST from 3.7+/-0.5 to 7.0+/-1.2 ml/min/100 ml (p<0.01). The increase in FBF averaged 3.3 ml/min/100 ml in both groups. Serum insulin remained unchanged in response to MST in controls, but decreased in response to MST during insulin infusion in both series (p = 0.04 and p = 0.004, respectively). The fall in glucose in response to MST during insulin infusion correlated with glucose disposal rate (GDR) (r = -0.40, p = 0.034, n = 28) and inversely with fasting insulin (r = 0.52, p = 0.004, n = 28). Thus, insulin infusion alters the glucose response to mental stress, i.e. there is a decrease in blood glucose concentration concomitant with an increased uptake. This glucose uptake is unrelated to FBF, but related to higher skeletal muscle insulin sensitivity and inversely to the fasting insulin level. Our data therefore suggest that infused insulin modifies the stress response through a mechanism at the tissue level. It may be speculated whether insulin counteracts unfavourable effects of mental stress and sympathetic activation on glucose metabolism.

Metabolic and adrenergic characteristics of young men with insulin resistance.

The primary site of insulin resistance, as measured by the euglycaemic glucose clamp technique, is skeletal muscle. We used the euglycaemic hyperinsulinaemic glucose clamp technique to assess insulin sensitivity (glucose disposal rate, GDR). We aimed at clarifying the demographic, metabolic, haemorrheological, haemodynamic, and by mental stress test the adrenergic characteristics of 21-year-old men grouped in tertiles according to their insulin (I) sensitivity index (GDR/I); insulin resistant group (GDR/I < 5.5 a.u., n = 17), intermediate group (5.5 < GDR/I < 9.5 a.u., n = 16) and insulin sensitive group (GDR/I > 9.5 a.u., n = 17). Insulin resistance was characterized by higher body mass index (p = 0.002, analysis of variance), triglycerides (p = 0.001), total cholesterol/high density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (p = 0.002), haemoglobin (p = 0.013), haematocrit (p = 0.017) and resting heart rate (p = 0.041) but not resting blood pressure or catecholamines in arterialized blood. However, the mental stress caused by announcement of a forthcoming arithmetic stress test increased diastolic blood pressure and plasma epinephrine dependent on insulin resistance (p = 0.006 and p = 0.012, respectively) with a similar trend also for the maximal increases in heart rate and plasma norepinephrine during arithmetic. Thus, in healthy young men, insulin resistance is not associated with differences in baseline blood pressure but is characterized by higher body weight, disorders in blood lipids and haemorrheology and a hyperadrenergic response to mental stress that even involves blood pressure. We suggest that the sympathetic nervous system may be involved in the pathophysiology of the characteristic insulin resistance or metabolic cardiovascular syndrome in young men.

Effects of losartan on insulin sensitivity in severe hypertension: connections through sympathetic nervous system activity?

Angiotensin II (Ang II) is one of the most potent vasoconstrictors, and the first specific and orally available Ang II-receptor antagonist, losartan (MK-954, DuP-753), has now come into clinical use. The primary site of insulin resistance, as measured by the glucose clamp technique, is skeletal muscle. Losartan specifically blocks Ang II-induced vasoconstriction, namely causes vasodilation, and may thus increase glucose delivery to skeletal muscle. We used the euglycaemic hyper-insulinaemic glucose clamp technique to assess insulin sensitivity (glucose disposal rate, GDR) or insulin (I) sensitivity index (GDR/I). In 21-year-old men we found negative correlations between GDR/I and blood viscosity (r = -0.69), haematocrit (r = -0.65), fibrinogen (r = -0.50), cholesterol/HDL ratio (r = -0.45), triglycerides (r = -0.46), body mass index (r = -0.64), waist/hip ratio (r = -0.57), resting heart rate (r = -0.46) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (r = -0.43), and with DBP (r = -0.62) and plasma adrenaline (r = -0.36) during mental arithmetic stress. In the Losartan Severe Hypertension Study five patients with a record of DBP > or = 115 mm Hg were examined before and on losartan monotherapy for an average of 6 weeks. GDR increased 27% and plasma noradrenaline decreased 40% (P < 0.05 for both) during treatment with losartan. Calculated whole blood viscosity decreased on losartan (P = 0.04) and the changes in GDR correlated with the changes in viscosity (r = 0.89). These results suggest that losartan, possibly by a sympathicolytic effect, lowers blood viscosity, causes vasodilation, and improves insulin sensitivity in essential hypertension.

Insulin resistance and sympathetic nervous system activity in hypertensive and normotensive premenopausal women.

The aim of the present study was to compare insulin sensitivity and catecholamine responses to insulin in lean, hypertensive (HT) and normotensive (NT) premenopausal women. HT (BP 149 5/99 +/- 2 mmHg, n = 14) and NT (BP 128 +/- 4/81 +/- 2 mmHg, n = 12) were matched for age (46 +/- 1 vs. 47 +/- 1 years) and body mass index. Insulin sensitivity was determined by fasting serum insulin, glucose disposal rate (GDR) and insulin sensitivity index (GDR/I) using euglycemic hyperinsulinemic glucose clamp technique. Sympathetic nervous system activity was assessed by plasma adrenaline and noradrenaline in arterialized venous blood at baseline and during euglycemic hyperinsulinemic glucose clamp. Insulin sensitivity index correlated negatively with total cholesterol in HT (r = -0.57, p < 0.05) and with body mass index (r = -0.42, p < 0.05, n = 26). The response in catecholamines to euglycemic hyperinsulinemia in HT differed from NT with an increase both in noradrenaline and adrenaline. Blood pressure and heart rate responses, however, did not differ between HT and NT. Fasting serum glucose did not differ between the two groups (4.7 +/- 0.1 mmol/l in HT vs. 4.9 +/- 0.1 mmol/l in NT), nor did fasting serum insulin (16 2 mU/l vs. 13 mU/l). Glucose disposal rate (8.8 +/- 0.5 vs. 8.7 +/- 0.7 mg kg-1 body weight min-1) and insulin sensitivity index were similar (7.3 +/- 0.8 vs. 7.6 +/- 0.8 arbitrary units). We conclude that in lean, premenopausal hypertensive women insulin sensitivity is not reduced compared with age- and weight-matched normotensive women, but the hypertensives respond to hyperinsulinemia with increased plasma catecholamines, i.e. sympathetic nervous systemic activity. Also, insulin sensitivity correlates negatively with serum cholesterol. Thus, an insulin-hyperadrenergic interaction may possibly be involved as a pathogenetic factor in lean hypertensive women.

[How to combine antihypertensive drugs?]. / Hvordan kombinere blodtrykkssenkende medikamenter?

Many hypertensive patients do not respond adequately to single-drug therapy and may therefore require two or more drugs to reach the treatment goal. The drugs used in combination therapy should have additive or synergistic effects on blood pressure. A potential benefit of combinations is to use lower doses of each drug, which may attenuate or abolish the occurrence of side effects. Different combinations are discussed, as well as the inhibition of compensatory mechanisms that may otherwise counteract the antihypertensive effect.

Effect of dietary counselling on blood pressure and arterial plasma catecholamines in primary hypertension.

There is still a need of support for nonpharmacologic treatment of uncomplicated, mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. We investigated whether a low sodium-based diet implemented by a nutritionist could lower blood pressure and affect sympathetic activity. Middle-aged, otherwise healthy men with never-treated essential hypertension (n = 95) were randomized to an intervention group, a blood pressure control group, and a time control group. The intervention group was advised to use less sodium chloride in their diet, and if necessary, less saturated fat and decrease body weight. They attended regular clinic visits as did the blood pressure control group. After 1 year, the intervention group had achieved on average 72 mmol/24 h lower urinary sodium excretion (P < .001) and a decrease in body weight of 2.7 +/- 0.5 kg (P < .001). Both supine and standing mean blood pressure were on average 8 to 10 mm Hg lower after intervention compared with the two control groups (P < .001). Arterial plasma epinephrine, measured in all 40-year-old subjects (n = 30), decreased in parallel in all three groups (P < .05), indicating some habituation to the invasive procedure and clinic visits. However, the decrease in norepinephrine was significant (P < .001) only in the intervention group; it correlated with the weight loss (r = 0.76, P < .05) and was significantly higher (P < .05) than in both control groups. These results suggest that broad dietary advice (ie, low intake of sodium chloride, saturated fat and energy), implemented by a nutritionist, may have a significant blood pressure lowering effect and a favorable sympathicolytic effect in uncomplicated, mild-to-moderate essential hypertension.

[Refractory hypertension]. / Refraktaer hypertensjon.

Resistant hypertension is a common disorder in general practice, and poses a challenge to clinicians. It is generally defined as failure to reduce blood pressure adequately despite the use of at least three different antihypertensive agents with different modes of action. The importance of recognizing expansion of plasma volume as a mediator of resistance to therapy is emphasized. Some patients may have white-coat hypertension. An even larger group of patients may fail to comply with the prescribed medication. A good physician-patient relationship is vital, and education of the patient is crucial for obtaining better adherence to the medication.

Haemodynamic and neurohumoral effects of cold pressor test in severe heart failure.

The effect of a cold pressor test (CPT) on haemodynamics in relation to general and regional sympathetic activity and arginin vasopressin (AVP), was studied in eleven patients with severe congestive heart failure (CHF). Compared to an age-matched control group (C), resting arterial plasma noradrenaline (NA) (419 +/- 77 vs. 182 +/- 15 pg ml-1), and adrenaline (A) (142 +/- 28 vs 54 +/- 10 pg ml-1) were higher (P less than 0.05) in CHF. AVP showed no significant difference (14 +/- 4 vs. 9 +/- 4 pg ml-1). During CPT systolic and diastolic blood pressure and systemic vascular resistance increased (P less than 0.01), as did NA (delta 114 +/- 39 pg ml-1, P less than 0.01), A (delta 33 +/- 10 pg ml-1, P less than 0.01) and heart rate (delta 10 beats min-1, P less than 0.01). The myocardial v-a difference of NA decreased (P less than 0.05), but was unchanged across the renal vascular bed during CPT. The a-v difference of NA in the hepatic vascular bed, and fractional extraction of A in the coronary sinus, renal and hepatic vascular beds remained unchanged during CPT. AVP did not change significantly and no change in cardiac index or left ventricular filling pressure was observed during CPT. These data suggest that despite an increased activation of the sympathetic nervous system at rest, a further increase in blood pressure and catecholamines took place during CPT. Thus, the effect of a CPT which activates the central sympathetic system seems not to be altered in patients with severe CHF.

The sympathetic nervous system may modulate the metabolic cardiovascular syndrome in essential hypertension.

The association between blood pressure and coronary artery disease may be caused by a concurrence of atherogenic biochemical abnormalities in hypertensive patients, i.e., the metabolic cardiovascular syndrome (increased total cholesterol, triglycerides, and insulin; decreased high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol; and insulin resistance, glucose intolerance, and blood platelet dysfunction). There are numerous reports of sympathetic nervous system overactivity in hypertensive subjects that could be of importance for the pathophysiology of the high blood pressure. Plasma catecholamines have metabolic hormonal effects at concentrations slightly above low normal resting levels. Even transiently and certainly chronically raised plasma catecholamine levels may cause biochemical abnormalities. Catecholamines may raise total cholesterol, triglycerides, and insulin, decrease HDL cholesterol, and cause insulin resistance and glucose intolerance, and recent evidence supports an in vivo influence of epinephrine on blood platelets, causing dysfunction in hypertensive subjects. Thus, the sympathetic nervous system may modulate the metabolic cardiovascular syndrome in essential hypertension. Hypertensive subjects may respond to environmental stimuli with larger sympathoadrenal responses than normal subjects. Furthermore, emotional stress has been associated with coronary artery disease. Thus, the metabolic hormonal effects of catecholamines, by causing the metabolic cardiovascular syndrome, may be the crucial link between "stress" and cardiovascular disease.

Renal haemodynamic and sympathetic responses to head-up tilt in essential hypertension.

Nine mild-to-moderate hypertensive patients (HT), aged 41 +/- 0.6 years (mean +/- SEM) and nine age-matched normotensive control subjects (NT) were tilted to 60 degrees for 10 min. During tilt, both systolic (S) blood pressure (BP) (p less than 0.01) and diastolic (D) BP (p less than 0.05) increased in HT, but not in NT. At supine rest renal blood flow was higher in HT than in NT and increased by 17% in HT during tilt, while a decrease of 13% was observed in NT (p less than 0.05). Renal vascular resistance was unchanged in HT during tilt, while a significant increase (p less than 0.01) was observed in NT. Arterial plasma noradrenaline increased in both groups (p less than 0.05) during tilt, significantly more in HT than in NT (p less than 0.05). No statistically significant difference was observed between the groups in renal catecholamine uptake or release. Our data indicate enhanced general sympathetic and circulatory responses to tilt in subjects with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. However, the enhanced haemodynamic and sympathetic responses were not shared by hypertensive kidneys and renovascular resistance remained unaffected by tilt.

Awareness of hypertension increases blood pressure and sympathetic responses to cold pressor test.

The present study was aimed at examining the effects of awareness of hypertension on blood pressure and sympathetic responses to the cold pressor test. Nineteen-year-old men with similarly elevated mean blood pressure at a medical screening, but without knowledge of this, were randomized into two groups. The first group (n = 16) was sent a letter saying that their pressure was too high, and the second (n = 13) was sent a neutral letter. Information increased mean blood pressure both after 15 min sitting, by an average of 11.5 mm Hg (P less than .01), and after 30 min supine rest, by an average of 4.5 mm Hg (P less than .05). Changes in heart rate (8.4 +/- 2.4 v 1.9 +/- 1.7 beats/min) and plasma epinephrine (0.11 +/- 0.04 v 0.01 +/- 0.03 nmol/L) during execution of a cold pressor test were significantly greater in the informed group (P less than .05). Plasma dopamine was lower in the informed group (P less than .05). Thus, psychological stress caused by the awareness of hypertension may increase blood pressure and sympathetic responses to a provocative maneuver. Ideally, studies on sympathetic function in essential hypertension should be undertaken on subjects unaware of their blood pressure status.

Increased erythrocyte magnesium in never treated essential hypertension.

In the present study we aimed at evaluating the intracellular concentrations of magnesium, potassium and sodium in 50-year-old, otherwise healthy white men with never treated, essential hypertension (n = 12) and in normotensive control subjects (n = 12) matched for age, sex, race, height, weight and smoking habits. Intraerythrocyte magnesium was significantly increased in the hypertensive group (P less than .001) and correlated positively and significantly to blood pressure in the total group (P less than .01). The intracellular potassium to sodium ratio tended to be lower in the hypertensive group (P less than .05). Thus, the present study supports increased intracellular magnesium probably unrelated to intracellular potassium-sodium imbalance in never treated, essential hypertension.

Increased erythrocyte magnesium content in essential hypertension.

The present study aimed at testing the hypothesis of decreased erythrocyte magnesium content and magnesium deficiency in essential hypertension. Atomic absorption was used to measure the erythrocyte content of total magnesium in 50-year-old otherwise healthy white males with essential hypertension (n = 12, blood pressure (mean +/- SE) 155 +/- 4/109 +/- 2 mmHg) that had never been treated and in normotensive control subjects (n = 12, blood pressure 128 +/- 2/88 +/- 1 mmHg) matched for age, sex, race, height, weight and smoking habits. The erythrocyte magnesium content was significantly increased in the hypertensive group (2.266 +/- 0.063 vs 1.903 +/- 0.069 mmol/l erythrocytes, p less than 0.001). No significant difference between the groups was detected for serum concentration or the 24-h urinary excretion of magnesium. In conclusion, the present study indicates increased rather than decreased erythrocyte content of magnesium in 50-year-old white males with 'never-treated', essential hypertension. Magnesium deficiency is, therefore, unlikely in this subset of critically selected and matched hypertensive patients.

Effects of beta 1- and beta 2-blockade on blood pressure and sympathetic responses to flight phobia stress.

Cardiovascular and sympathoadrenal effects of short-term oral treatment with beta 1-blockade (atenolol, 50 mg, administered two times) and beta 2-blockade (ICI 118,551, 50 mg, administered three times) were compared with placebo during actual flying in subjects with flight phobia (n = 34). beta 1-Blockade lowered resting blood pressure and heart rate and prevented a heart rate response but not a blood pressure response to this psychologic stress. beta 2-Blockade minimally lowered resting heart rate and prevented a heart rate response, but it failed to lower resting blood pressure or blood pressure response to the stress. Plasma epinephrine increased with all three treatments and more with beta 1-blockade than with placebo. Plasma norepinephrine decreased with administration of beta 2-blockade. Thus neither beta 1- nor beta 2-blockade prevents an increase in blood pressure during acute flight phobia stress. Increased plasma epinephrine seems to be the sympathetic variable that is closest related to this increase in blood pressure. Norepinephrine may be less consistently related to the blood pressure rise during flight phobia stress as shown by the decrease in plasma norepinephrine with administration of beta 2-blockade.

Increased erythrocyte magnesium in untreated essential hypertension.

In the present study we tested the hypothesis of magnesium deficiency and intracellular magnesium depletion in essential hypertension. Atomic absorption was used to determine the erythrocyte content of magnesium in 50-year-old otherwise healthy white men with never-treated, essential hypertension (n = 12, supine blood pressure 155 +/- 4/109 +/- 2 mmHg) and in a group of particularly well-matched normotensive control subjects. The erythrocyte magnesium content was higher in the hypertensive group (P less than 0.001). No significant difference between the groups was detected for serum concentration or the 24-h urinary excretion of the magnesium. In conclusion, magnesium deficiency is unlikely in white middle-aged hypertensive men.