DynaCT in pre-treatment evaluation of aortic aneurysm before EVAR.

OBJECTIVE: DynaCT(®) is a method for obtaining computed tomography (CT)-like images using a C-arm system. Our aim was to compare the accuracy of these images to multidetector CT (MDCT) images prior to endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). METHODS: A non-consecutive group of 20 elective patients were prospectively exposed to MDCT and one additional DynaCT before EVAR. Six arterial measurements and nine anatomical areas were chosen to: (1) visualise the peri-aortic soft tissue and assess the possibility to diagnose a potential haemorrhage from a ruptured aneurysm and (2) make the pre-treatment measurements before insertion of stent graft. Differences between modalities and readers were statistically compared using a linear mixed model. RESULTS: For maximum aortic diameter, a significant difference of 1.3 mm was found between techniques (p = 0.043). Visibility scores were significantly better for all areas in MDCT data. Pre-treatment evaluation with DynaCT before EVAR was possible for all areas; evaluation of the iliac arteries were suboptimal due to a limited imaging volume size. Significant inter-reader differences were found for all anatomical areas. CONCLUSION: The result indicates that DynaCT gives sufficient information to determine the correct treatment and for selecting the proper stent graft before EVAR. A limited volume size reduces the evaluation of the iliac arteries.

DynaCT during EVAR--a comparison with multidetector CT.

OBJECTIVES: We have explored the usefulness of an on-table, cross-sectional radiological imaging (DynaCT) in endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). DynaCT images were compared to images from a regular multidetector (16 slice) CT. In the comparison, we tested the accordance of firstly 5 relevant clinical measurements and secondly the visibility of 9 anatomical areas in the two different types of images. This imaging was carried out in addition to the usual angiographic imaging. DESIGN, MATERIAL AND METHOD: 20 patients with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) were prospectively enrolled in the study. We compared Images from DynaCT with two different doses of contrast medium to MDCT-images in two different ways. Firstly relevant arterial diameters and lengths and secondly, 9 anatomical areas were evaluated regarding visibility which was scored on a 4-point scale. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the measured arterial diameters and lengths. MDCT had a significantly higher visibility score than both DynaCT investigations. However, with the highest contrast medium dose we found acceptable diagnostic quality in 78-94% of the cases for 8 of the 9 investigated anatomical areas. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that on-table DynaCT are of sufficient quality to give relevant information of arterial measurements, needed in endovascular repair of infrarenal aortic aneurysms.