RESUMO
Introduction: Tumor-induced osteomalacia (TIO) is a rare paraneoplastic disorder where patients present with hypophosphatemia, chronic diffuse bone pain, and occasionally fractures. Benign phosphaturic mesenchymal tumors (PMT) are responsible for the TIO and are largely soft tissue tumors. Cases: Two male patients with TIO secondary to PMT were reported-one in the bony scapula and the other in the plantar foot soft tissue. The first case describes a 63-year-old Caucasian male, who sustained an intertrochanteric proximal femur stress fracture and approximately two years of diffuse bone pain and hypophosphatemia. Wide excision of a left scapula boney lesion resulted in immediate resolution of his electrolyte abnormalities and bone pain. Case 2 describes a 58-year-old male with four years of multifocal bone pain and atraumatic fractures. A 68Ga-DOTATATE-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scan identified a soft tissue tumor in his plantar foot, which was ultimately excised. He also experienced near immediate resolution of his pain and no additional fractures. Conclusion: TIO is a rare condition presenting with chronic multifocal bone pain, stress fractures, and hypophosphatemia. These two cases highlight that the causative tumor may originate in soft tissue or bone. Furthermore, a high index of suspicion, along with fibroblast growth factor-23 testing and DOTATATE-PET/CT localization, can help with diagnosis and minimize treatment delays.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The decision to resurface the patella in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is controversial. While there is some consensus that leaving the patella unresurfaced increases risk of reoperation, there is conflicting evidence about patient reported outcomes or indications for resurfacing. This study sought to determine recent rates of patellar resurfacing, examine factors affecting rates of resurfacing, and analyze the associations between patellar resurfacing and both revision rates and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). METHODS: The American Joint Replacement Registry was used to identify primary TKAs performed for osteoarthritis between 2012 and 2021. Cases were classified as resurfaced patella and unresurfaced patella (URP). Outcomes analyzed included trends in patellar resurfacing, factors influencing rate of resurfacing, revision rates, operative time, and 2 PROMs. RESULTS: Rates of patellar resurfacing decreased and rates of URP increased significantly faster in ambulatory surgery centers and among high volume surgeons. Operative time was significantly lower in URP versus resurfaced patella (88.15 versus 89.90 minutes). The URP were significantly more likely to require revision surgery (odds ratio = 1.206 (1.078, 1.35), P = .0011). There was no significant difference in the likelihood of achieving the minimal clinically important difference in PROMs between resurfaced and nonresurfaced TKAs at 1 year (odds ratio = 1.060 (0.710, 1.581), P = .7755). CONCLUSION: There was no difference in minimal clinically important difference between resurfaced and URPs and no clinically relevant difference in operative time. However, URPs were more likely to require revision surgery. Therefore, the decision not to resurface should be made carefully considering the known risk of revision and the uncertain benefit.
