Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 30(11): 1525-31, 2015 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26319887

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Anastomotic leak (AL) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality associated with complications of colorectal surgery. Furthermore, AL results in prolonged hospital stays and significant increase in costs of medical resources. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, we investigated the impact of anastomosis technique on the rate of anastomotic leak. The rate of leak was compared between two groups performing end-to-end (E-E) vs. side-to-end (S-E) anastomosis. The impact of various risk factors was also compared between the two groups. RESULTS: There were 382 E-E and 363 S-E anastomoses after left colectomy or rectal resections. The anastomotic leak rate was 8.64 % using E-E compared to 1.93 % using S-E anastomosis technique (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that the rate of anastomotic leak after left colon and rectum resections could be significantly reduced utilizing S-E anastomosis technique.


Assuntos
Fístula Anastomótica/etiologia , Colectomia/efeitos adversos , Reto/cirurgia , Anastomose Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Colectomia/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Grampeamento Cirúrgico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...