Quantum alchemy beyond singlets: Bonding in diatomic molecules with hydrogen.

Bonding energies play an essential role in describing the relative stability of molecules in chemical space. Therefore, methods employed to search chemical space need to capture the bonding behavior for a wide range of molecules, including radicals. In this work, we investigate the ability of quantum alchemy to capture the bonding behavior of hypothetical chemical compounds, specifically diatomic molecules involving hydrogen with various electronic structures. We evaluate equilibrium bond lengths, ionization energies, and electron affinities of these fundamental systems. We compare and contrast how well manual quantum alchemy calculations, i.e., quantum mechanics calculations in which the nuclear charge is altered, and quantum alchemy approximations using a Taylor series expansion can predict these molecular properties. Our results suggest that while manual quantum alchemy calculations outperform Taylor series approximations, truncations of Taylor series approximations after the second order provide the most accurate Taylor series predictions. Furthermore, these results suggest that trends in quantum alchemy predictions are generally dependent on the predicted property (i.e., equilibrium bond length, ionization energy, or electron affinity). Taken together, this work provides insight into how quantum alchemy predictions using a Taylor series expansion may be applied to future studies of non-singlet systems as well as the challenges that remain open for predicting the bonding behavior of such systems.

Evaluating quantum alchemy of atoms with thermodynamic cycles: Beyond ground electronic states.

Due to the sheer size of chemical and materials space, high-throughput computational screening thereof will require the development of new computational methods that are accurate, efficient, and transferable. These methods need to be applicable to electron configurations beyond ground states. To this end, we have systematically studied the applicability of quantum alchemy predictions using a Taylor series expansion on quantum mechanics (QM) calculations for single atoms with different electronic structures arising from different net charges and electron spin multiplicities. We first compare QM method accuracy to experimental quantities, including first and second ionization energies, electron affinities, and spin multiplet energy gaps, for a baseline understanding of QM reference data. Next, we investigate the intrinsic accuracy of "manual" quantum alchemy. This method uses QM calculations involving nuclear charge perturbations of one atom's basis set to model another. We then discuss the reliability of quantum alchemy based on Taylor series approximations at different orders of truncation. Overall, we find that the errors from finite basis set treatments in quantum alchemy are significantly reduced when thermodynamic cycles are employed, which highlights a route to improve quantum alchemy in explorations of chemical space. This work establishes important technical aspects that impact the accuracy of quantum alchemy predictions using a Taylor series and provides a foundation for further quantum alchemy studies.