How sleepy patients differ from non-sleepy patients in mild obstructive sleep apnea?

To aim is investigate whether demographic, polysomnographic or sleep behaviour data differ between non-sleepy, sleepy and very sleepy patients with mild obstructive sleep apnea. The study population consisted of 439 consecutive adult patients diagnosed with mild obstructive sleep apnea (5 ≤ apnea-hypopnea index < 15) after a complete polysomnographic evaluation. The patients were divided into three groups based on subjective sleepiness: very sleepy (Epworth Sleepiness Scale ≥ 16, n = 59); sleepy (10 < Epworth Sleepiness Scale < 16, n = 102); and non-sleepy (Epworth Sleepiness Scale ≤ 10, n = 278). Demographic, polysomnographic and sleep behaviour data were compared between the groups. There were no statistically significant differences in breathing abnormality indices and most of the demographic features between the groups. The number of arousals was significantly higher in the very sleepy group compared with the non-sleepy group (140.8 ± 105.2 versus 107.6 ± 72.2). Very sleepy patients reported feeling sleepy during the daytime more often (42.4% versus 31.7%) and sleeping significantly less during the week compared with non-sleepy patients. Also, a significantly higher proportion of sleepy (47.1%) and very sleepy patients (44.1%) reported taking naps during weekends compared with non-sleepy patients (35.6%). In a regression analysis, also total sleep time (ß = 0.045), sleep efficiency (ß = -0.160), apnea index (ß = -0.397), apnea-hypopnea index in supine position (ß = 0.044), periodic limb movement index (ß = 0.196) and periodic limb movement-related arousal index (ß = -0.210) affected subjective daytime sleepiness. The results suggest that excessive daytime sleepiness in patients with mild obstructive sleep apnea appears to be related to inadequate sleeping habits (i.e. insufficient sleep during working days) and decreased sleep quality rather than differences in breathing abnormalities.

Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Do Positional Patients Become Nonpositional Patients With Time?

OBJECTIVES: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients with breathing abnormalities only or mainly in the supine posture are designated positional patients (PPs), whereas nonpositional patients (NPPs) have many breathing abnormalities in both lateral and supine postures. Positional therapy (PT), the avoidance of the supine posture during sleep, is the obvious treatment for PPs. The stability over time of being PP and leading factors that are involved in converting a PP to an NPP are addressed. METHODS: We analyzed polysomnographic (PSG) recordings of 81 consecutive adult patients with OSA who were judged to be PPs at the first PSG evaluation, and their follow-up PSGs were obtained after an average period of 6.6 years. RESULTS: The follow-up PSGs indicated that 57 PPs (70.4%) remained PPs, whereas 24 (29.6 %) converted to NPPs. Among PPs and NPPs, body mass index (P ≤ 0.05), overall Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI, P ≤ 0.087), and lateral AHI (P ≤ 0.046) increased and minimum SpO2 during rapid eye movement (REM) sleep (P ≤ 0.028) decreased significantly during the follow-up. However, among patients who became NPPs, the changes in these parameters were significantly (P ≤ 0.05) more pronounced compared to the patients who remained PPs. CONCLUSION: After an average of 6.6 years, 70.4% of PPs remained PPs. Therefore, if adherence for PT is good, they could continue to benefit from this therapy. For those who turned to NPPs, PT will not be the optimal treatment anymore; thus, these patients should be frequently monitored. Furthermore, an early treatment of PPs with PT would be highly beneficial to prevent worsening of their OSA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2b Laryngoscope, 130:2263-2268, 2020.