A proposed clinical coagulation score for research in trauma-induced coagulopathy.

BACKGROUND: Trauma-induced coagulopathy (TIC) has been the subject of intense study for greater than a century, and it is associated with high morbidity and mortality. The Trans-Agency Consortium for Trauma-Induced Coagulopathy, funded by the National Health Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, was tasked with developing a clinical TIC score, distinguishing between injury-induced bleeding from persistent bleeding due to TIC. We hypothesized that the Trans-Agency Consortium for Trauma-Induced Coagulopathy clinical TIC score would correlate with laboratory measures of coagulation, transfusion requirements, and mortality. METHODS: Trauma activation patients requiring a surgical procedure for hemostasis were scored in the operating room (OR) and in the first ICU day by the attending trauma surgeon. Conventional and viscoelastic (thrombelastography) coagulation assays, transfusion requirements, and mortality were correlated to the coagulation scores using the Cochran-Armitage trend test or linear regression for numerical variables. RESULTS: Increased OR TIC scores were significantly associated with abnormal conventional and viscoelastic measurements, including hyperfibrinolysis incidence, as well as with higher mortality and more frequent requirement for massive transfusion ( p < 0.0001 for all trends). Patients with OR TIC score greater than 3 were more than 31 times more likely to have an ICU TIC score greater than 3 (relative risk, 31.6; 95% confidence interval, 12.7-78.3; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: A clinically defined TIC score obtained in the OR reflected the requirement for massive transfusion and mortality in severely injured trauma patients and also correlated with abnormal coagulation assays. The OR TIC score should be validated in multicenter studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level IV.

BLOOD TYPE O IS A RISK FACTOR FOR HYPERFIBRINOLYSIS AND MASSIVE TRANSFUSION AFTER SEVERE INJURY.

ABSTRACT: Background: Blood type O is the most common blood type and has lower von Willebrand factor (vWF) levels (25%-35% lower than non-O blood types). von Willebrand factor is important for initiating platelet attachment and binding factor VIII. We hypothesized that patients with type O blood are at an increased risk of trauma-induced coagulopathy and bleeding post injury. Study Design: Adult trauma activations with known blood type at a level I trauma center with field systolic blood pressure < 90 mm Hg were studied retrospectively. The relationships of blood group O versus non-O to coagulation assays, massive transfusion (MT), ventilator-free days, and mortality were adjusted for confounders. Hyperfibrinolysis (HF) was defined as thromboelastogram of percent lysis in 30 min > 3%, and fibrinolysis shutdown was defined as percent lysis in 30 min < 0.9%. von Willebrand factor activity was quantified on 212 injured patients using a STAGO apparatus. Results: Overall, 268 patients met criteria. Type O patients were more likely to develop HF than non-type O blood patients (43% vs. 29%, P = 0.06) and had significantly lower vWF activity (222% vs. 249%, P = 0.01). After adjustment for New Injury Severity Score and blunt mechanism, type O had higher odds of HF (odds ratio, 1.94, 95% confidence interval, 1.09-3.47) and increased odds of MT (odds ratio, 3.02; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-7.49). Other outcomes were not significantly affected. Conclusion: Type O patients with hypotension had increased HF and MT post injury, and these were associated with lower vWF activity. These findings have implications for the monitoring of HF in patients receiving type O whole-blood transfusions post injury.

Strategies for successful implementation of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in an urban Level I trauma center.

BACKGROUND: The rationale for resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is to control life-threatening subdiaphragmatic bleeding and facilitate resuscitation; however, incorporating this into the resuscitative practices of a trauma service remains challenging. The objective of this study is to describe the process of successful implementation of REBOA use in an academic urban Level I trauma center. All REBOA procedures from April 2014 through December 2019 were evaluated; REBOA was implemented after surgical faculty attended a required and internally developed Advanced Endovascular Strategies for Trauma Surgeons course. Success was defined by sustained early adoption rates. METHODS: An institutional protocol was published, and a REBOA supply cart was placed in the emergency department with posters attached to depict technical and procedural details. A focused professional practice evaluation was utilized for the first three REBOA procedures performed by each faculty member, leading to internal privileging. RESULTS: Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta was performed in 97 patients by nine trauma surgeons, which is 1% of the total trauma admissions during this time. Each surgeon performed a median of 12 REBOAs (interquartile range, 5-14). Blunt (77/97, 81%) or penetrating abdominopelvic injuries (15/97, 15%) comprised the main injury mechanisms; 4% were placed for other reasons (4/97), including ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (n = 3) and preoperatively for a surgical oncologic resection (n = 1). Overall survival was 65% (63/97) with a steady early adoption trend that resulted in participation in a Department of Defense multicenter trial. CONCLUSION: Strategies for how departments adopt new procedures require clinical guidelines, a training program focused on competence, and a hospital education and privileging process for those acquiring new skills. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, level V.