The impact of COVID-19 on the birth rate in Nigeria: a report from population-based registries.

Background and objectives: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a pandemic that has become a major source of morbidity and mortality worldwide, affecting the physical and mental health of individuals influencing reproduction. Despite the threat, it poses to maternal health in sub-Saharan Africa and Nigeria, there is little or no data on the impact it has on fertility, conception, gestation and birth. To compare the birth rate between pre-COVID and COVID times using selected months of the year. Materials and methods: This was a secondary analysis of cross-sectional analytical study data from the birth registries of three tertiary hospitals, comparing two years [2019 (Pre-COVID)] versus [2020 (COVID era)] using three months of the year (October to December). The data relied upon was obtained from birth registries in three busy maternity clinics all within tertiary hospitals in South-East Nigeria and we aimed at discussing the potential impacts of COVID-19 on fertility in Nigeria. The secondary outcome measures were; mode of delivery, booking status of the participants, maternal age and occupation. Results: There was a significant decrease in tertiary-hospital based birth rate by 92 births (P = 0.0009; 95% CI: -16.0519 to -4.1481) among mothers in all the three hospitals in 2020 during the COVID period (post lockdown months) of October to December. There was a significant difference in the mode of delivery for mothers (P = 0.0096) with a 95% confidence interval of 1.0664 to 1.5916, as more gave birth through vaginal delivery during the 2020 COVID-19 period than pre-COVID-19. Conclusion: Tertiary-hospital based birth rates were reduced during the pandemic. Our multi-centre study extrapolated on possible factors that may have played a role in this decline in their birth rate, which includes but is not limited to; decreased access to hospital care due to the total lockdowns/curfews and worsening inflation and economic recession in the country.

Cesarean section rate and outcomes during and before the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic.

Objectives: The objective of the study was to assess how the current COVID-19 pandemic has affected cesarean section (C-section) rates, indications, and peripartum outcomes. Methods: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study that compared a 3-month rates of and indications for C-sections at three tertiary health care institutions in Nigeria before (October 2019-December 2019) and during the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic (March 2020-May 2020). Primary outcomes were C-section rate and indications between the two periods. Data were analyzed using SPSS 26.0 IBM Corporation. Rates and odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were used to quantify indications and peripartum outcomes and statistical significance was accepted when p value was <0.05. Results: The baseline characteristics of the two groups were similar. The C-section rate during the COVID-19 period was significantly less than the period prior to the pandemic (237/580, 40.0% vs 390/833, 46.8%; p = 0.027). The rates of postdatism (odds ratio = 1.47, 95% confidence interval = 1.05-2.05, p = 0.022), fetal distress (odds ratio = 3.06, 95% confidence interval = 1.55-6.06, p = 0.017), emergency C-section (odds ratio = 1.43, 95% confidence interval = 1.01-2.05, p = 0.042), and anemia (odds ratio = 1.84, 95% confidence interval = 1.12-3.03, p = 0.016) were significantly higher during the pandemic than prepandemic. Conclusion: The overall C-section rate during the first wave of COVID-19 was significantly lower than the prepandemic period. There were higher rates of postdatism, fetal distress, emergency C-section, and postpartum anemia. Further studies on this changing C-section trend during the pandemic are needed.

A double-blind placebo controlled trial on effectiveness of prophylactic dexamethasone for preventing post- dural puncture headache after spinal anesthesia for cesarean section.

AIM: To determine the effect of dexamethasone in reducing post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) after spinal anesthesia for cesarean section (CS). METHODS: A double blind placebo controlled randomized trial of parturients undergoing CS under spinal anesthesia was conducted. Participants (n = 192) were randomly (1:1 ratio) given either 2mls (8 mg) of dexamethasone (n = 96) intravenously or 2mls of normal saline (n = 96) intravenously as placebo after clamping the umbilical cord. Visual analogue scale was used to assess the incidence and severity of PDPH on the first and fourth post-operative days. The primary outcome measure was incidence of PDPH while the secondary outcome measure was incidence of nausea and vomiting. Analysis was by intention-to-treat. RESULTS: Baseline socio-demographic and clinical variables were similar between the two groups and none of the women was lost to follow up. The incidence of PDPH (8.3% vs 25.0%; p = .002) and nausea (11.5% vs 25.0%; p = .015) were significantly lower in dexamethasone group. The severity of headache in the control groups were statistically higher on the first (p < .001) and fourth (p < .001) post-operative days. . CONCLUSION: Prophylactic dexamethasone reduces the incidence and severity of PDPH on both the first and fourth post-operative day after spinal anesthesia for CS. There was also an improvement on the incidence of nausea on the dexamethasone group compared to control.

A randomized controlled clinical trial on peripartum effects of delayed versus immediate umbilical cord clamping on term newborns.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the hemoglobin and serum bilirubin concentration of term newborn following delayed and immediate umbilical cord clamping. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial of eligible parturients with singleton pregnancy delivered between July 1, 2019 and September 30, 2020 were randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to either delayed clamping of umbilical cord (60 s after delivery) or immediate clamping (0-15 s) was done. The primary outcome measures included hemoglobin and bilirubin levels of the newborn measured at birth and 48 h of life. Intention-to-treat principle was applied to analysis (www.pactr.org: PACTR201906668876480). RESULTS: One hundred and two newborns were randomized into each group and none was lost to follow-up. Participants in both groups had similar socio-demographic and clinical characteristics. At 0 h of birth, cord blood hemoglobin concentration and total bilirubin values were not significantly different between the two groups (p > 0.05). At 48 h of birth, mean hemoglobin concentration was significantly higher in delayed clamping group than immediate clamping group (16.51 ± 1.71 g/dl vs 15.16 ± 2.27 g/dl; p < 0.001) but total mean bilirubin concentration was not significantly different (3.88 ± 1.54 mg/dl vs 3.71 ± 1.20 mg/dl; p = 0.380). There was no significant difference in postpartum hemorrhage (p = 0.653), neonatal jaundice (p = 0.856), and need for phototherapy (p = 0.561) while respiratory symptoms, polycythemia and anemia were not reported. CONCLUSION: Delayed cord clamping at childbirth is more advantageous for term infants in terms of more hemoglobin concentration compared to traditional immediate cord clamping. The maternal and perinatal complications were either not significantly different or absent.

A double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trial on the effect of hyosine n-butyl bromide for improving duration of labor in term pregnancies.

AIM: To compare the effectiveness of intramuscular hyocine n-butyl bromide (HBB) with placebo for shortening the duration of the first stage of labor in term pregnancies. METHODS: A double blind placebo-controlled randomized trial of parturients who presented at term in the active phase of labor was conducted. They were randomly (1:1 ratio) given intramuscular injection of either 40 mg (2 mL) of HBB or 2 mL of water for injection as a placebo. The primary outcome measures were the duration of first and second stages of labor. Subgroup analysis of primigravid and multigravid women were also performed for various outcomes. We did intention-to-treat analysis. RESULTS: Sixty-two women were randomized to each group and none were lost to follow-up. Baseline characteristics were similar between the HBB and placebo groups. The mean duration of first stage of labor was noted to be significantly shorter in the HBB group for both the primigravidas (246.6 ± 21.9 vs 391.8 ± 56.6 min for control; P < 0.001) and for multigravidas (205.9 ± 17.8 vs 323.8 ± 16.0 min for control;P < 0.001).There was also significantly shorter duration of second stage of labor in the HBB group (primigravida: P = 0.013; multigravida: P = 0.016). The duration of third stage of labor, mode of delivery and maternal and/or neonatal outcomes for both classes of parturients were not significantly different. CONCLUSION: HBB is effective in reducing the first and second stages of labor without adverse maternal or neonatal outcome. HBB does not significantly influence the duration of third stage of labor including mode of delivery. More evidence is needed to further explore the potential useful role of HBB in the active phase of labor.