The Effect of Sevelamer on Serum Levels of Gut-Derived Uremic Toxins: Results from In Vitro Experiments and A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Clinical Trial.

High serum levels of gut-derived uremic toxins, especially p-cresyl sulfate (pCS), indoxyl sulfate (IS) and indole acetic acid (IAA), have been linked to adverse outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Sevelamer carbonate could represent an interesting option to limit the elevation of gut-derived uremic toxins. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the adsorptive effect of sevelamer carbonate on different gut-derived protein-bound uremic toxins or their precursors in vitro, and its impact on the serum levels of pCS, IS and IAA in patients with CKD stage 3b/4. For the in vitro experiments, IAA, p-cresol (precursor of pCS) and indole (precursor of IS), each at a final concentration of 1 or 10 µg/mL, were incubated in centrifugal 30 kDa filter devices with 3 or 15 mg/mL sevelamer carbonate in phosphate-buffered saline at a pH adjusted to 6 or 8. Then, samples were centrifuged and free uremic toxins in the filtrates were analyzed. As a control experiment, the adsorption of phosphate was also evaluated. Additionally, patients with stage 3b/4 CKD (defined as an eGFR between 15 and 45 mL/min per 1.73 m2) were included in a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial. The participants received either placebo or sevelamer carbonate (4.8 g) three times a day for 12 weeks. The concentrations of the toxins and their precursors were measured using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography method with a diode array detector. In vitro, regardless of the pH and concentration tested, sevelamer carbonate did not show adsorption of indole and p-cresol. Conversely, with 10 µg/mL IAA, use of a high concentration of sevelamer carbonate (15 mg/mL) resulted in a significant toxin adsorption both at pH 8 (mean reduction: 26.3 ± 3.4%) and pH 6 (mean reduction: 38.7 ± 1.7%). In patients with CKD stage 3b/4, a 12-week course of treatment with sevelamer carbonate was not associated with significant decreases in serum pCS, IS and IAA levels (median difference to baseline levels: -0.12, 0.26 and -0.06 µg/mL in the sevelamer group vs. 1.97, 0.38 and 0.05 µg/mL in the placebo group, respectively). Finally, in vitro, sevelamer carbonate was capable of chelating a gut-derived uremic toxin IAA but not p-cresol and indole, the precursors of pCS and IS in the gut. In a well-designed clinical study of patients with stage 3b/4 CKD, a 12-week course of treatment with sevelamer carbonate was not associated with significant changes in the serum concentrations of pCS, IS and IAA.

Randomized Clinical Trial of Sevelamer Carbonate on Serum Klotho and Fibroblast Growth Factor 23 in CKD.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Epidemiologic studies suggest that higher serum phosphaturic hormone fibroblast growth factor 23 levels are associated with increase morbidity and mortality. The aim of the FGF23 Reduction Efficacy of a New Phosphate Binder in CKD Trial was to evaluate the effect of sevelamer carbonate on serum C-terminal fibroblast growth factor 23 levels in normophosphatemic patients with CKD stage 3b/4. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Patients with CKD, eGFR between 45 and 15 ml/min per 1.73 m2, fasting serum phosphate concentration >3.1 mg/dl, and serum C-terminal fibroblast growth factor 23 >80 relative units/ml were included in our double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized multicenter study. All patients received 100,000 IU cholecalciferol at time of randomization. Participants received either placebo or sevelamer carbonate 4.8 g daily during a 12-week period. Biologic parameters, including serum C-terminal fibroblast growth factor 23, intact fibroblast growth factor 23, and α-klotho, were evaluated at baseline and 12 weeks after inclusion. RESULTS: Of 96 screened patients, 78 (mean±SD age: 63±13 years old; 70% men; mean eGFR: 27±9 ml/min per 1.73 m2) met the inclusion criteria. At baseline, mean eGFR was 27±9 ml/min per 1.73 m2, mean serum phosphate level was 3.8±0.5 mg/dl, and median (interquartile range) serum C-terminal fibroblast growth factor 23 level was 157 (120-241) relative units/ml. After 12 weeks of treatment, urinary phosphate-to-creatinine ratio fell significantly in the sevelamer group. The sevelamer and placebo groups did not differ significantly in terms of median change in serum C-terminal fibroblast growth factor 23 levels: the median (interquartile range) change was 38 (-13-114) relative units/ml in the placebo group and 37 (-1-101) relative units/ml in the sevelamer group (P=0.77). There was no significant difference in serum intact fibroblast growth factor 23, α-klotho, or phosphate levels changes between the two groups. Serum total and LDL cholesterol levels fell significantly in the sevelamer group. CONCLUSIONS: In our double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study performed in normophosphatemic patients with CKD, a 12-week course of sevelamer carbonate significantly reduced phosphaturia without changing serum phosphorus but did not significantly modify serum C-terminal fibroblast growth factor 23 and intact fibroblast growth factor 23 or α-klotho levels.

Efficacy and safety of nicotinamide in haemodialysis patients: the NICOREN study.

BACKGROUND: Nicotinamide (NAM) has been proposed as an alternative treatment to phosphate binders for hyperphosphataemia in chronic kidney disease. METHODS: The NICOREN multicentre, open-label and randomized study was designed to examine non-inferiority and safety of NAM when compared with sevelamer (SEV) in chronic haemodialysis patients. One hundred patients were randomized to either NAM or SEV treatment for 24 weeks. Serum biochemistry and NAM's main metabolite, N -methyl-2-pyridone-5-carboxamide (2PY), were measured to assess compliance, efficacy and safety. RESULTS: After 24 weeks, we observed a comparable decrease in serum phosphorus in the NAM and SEV treatment arms, from 2.1 ± 0.4 to 1.8 ± 0.5 and 2.3 ± 0.5 to 1.7 ± 0.5 mM (P = not significant), respectively. The criterion for non-inferiority was, however, not met due to a more limited number of patients being included than planned. Treatment discontinuation due to adverse events was 1.6 times higher in the NAM than in the SEV group with only 55% of study completers in the NAM arm versus 90% in the SEV arm. Thrombocytopenia was observed in four NAM-treated patients. Serum 2PY levels were comparable at baseline, but increased markedly in the NAM group, but not in the SEV group, at 24 weeks (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Thus, both drugs are equally effective in lowering serum phosphorus, but patients' tolerance of NAM was largely inferior to that of SEV. Extremely high 2PY levels may contribute to NAM's side effects.

Reappraisal of 2003 NKF-K/DOQI guidelines for management of hyperparathyroidism in chronic kidney disease patients.

The 2003 guidelines for the management of hyperparathyroidism in chronic kidney disease compiled by the Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative of the National Kidney Foundation (NKF-K/DOQI) were formulated on the basis of work published up until 2001. Since then, new drugs (e.g. calcimimetics and lanthanum carbonate) have become available, and others (e.g. sevelamer, nicotinamide and paricalcitol) have been more stringently clinically evaluated. Because of these advancements, a reappraisal of the 2003 guidelines is justified. In this article we critically review the following recommendations of the NKF-K/DOQI: (i) routine use of 1.25 mmol/l (5.0 mg/dl) dialysate calcium and 1 alphaOH-vitamin D derivatives; (ii) limitation of the maximal daily dose of calcium-based oral phosphate binders to 1.5 g of elemental calcium; and (iii) not correcting vitamin D insufficiency in dialysis patients.

How do calcimimetics fit into the management of parathyroid hormone, calcium, and phosphate disturbances in dialysis patients?

As suggested by its American brand name (Sensipar), the calcimimetic cinacalcet sensitizes the parathyroid cells to the extracellular calcium signal, suppressing parathyroid hormone (PTH) release and synthesis and preventing parathyroid cell proliferation. This primary PTH suppression decreases the release of calcium and phosphate from bone without increasing intestinal absorption of calcium and phosphate. Therefore cinacalcet decreases the risk of hypercalcemia and hyperphosphatemia in contrast to 1alpha-OH vitamin D derivatives. Compared with calcium-containing oral phosphate binder (OPB), it increases the risk of hypocalcemia and may decrease the PTH-mediated phosphaturia in predialysis patients. This justifies its combined use with calcium-containing OPB in order to prevent hypocalcemia and enhance the hypophosphatemic effect of the latter, while improving PTH suppression. The National Kidney Foundation (NKF) Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (K/DOQI) has recommended restriction of supplemental elemental calcium to 1.5 g/day, a recommendation that we believe should be revised. No pathophysiologic or randomized trial data have yet evidenced the absolute necessity for systematically using 1alpha-OH vitamin D derivatives and noncalcium-containing OPB rather than higher doses of calcium-containing OPB alone in uremic patients without vitamin D insufficiency. In patients with hyperparathyroidism as severe as in the "Treat to Goal Study," the Durham study showed that a calcium carbonate dose more than three times the K/DOQI limit could decrease PTH into the recommended range, with the advantage of a lower calcium-phosphate product compared with the combination of calcitriol and noncalcium OPB. Besides the efficient PTH suppression associated with lower calcium-phosphate product and a good gastrointestinal tolerance, long-term data suggest that cinacalcet may decrease the risk of parathyroidectomy and fracture, while high bone turnover lesions are improved. However, no long-term data on bone mineral density and cardiovascular calcification and complications are yet available. Such studies, along with those comparing cinacalcet and 1alpha-OH vitamin D-based approaches to hyperparathyroidism, are needed.

Bone mineral density directly correlates with elevated serum leptin in haemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Experimentally, leptin has a positive effect on bone mass when infused intravenously, but a negative one after intracerebroventricular administration. Renal failure increases its serum level above the concentration beyond which its transport to the brain may be saturated. Thus, we tested, in a chronic haemodialysis population, the hypothesis of a positive relationship between serum leptin and bone mineral density (BMD) when serum levels are above this threshold. METHODS: Serum leptin (using a two-site RIA), and BMD at the femoral neck, midshaft, and ultradistal radius, as measured by DEXA, were assessed in 17 female and 16 male chronic dialysis patients, with comparable calcium and phosphate metabolism, age and dialysis duration. RESULTS: Polynomial regression analysis showed a U-shaped correlation between BMD Z-score, with an inflexion point, which may correspond to the concentration threshold at which leptin blood-brain carrier is saturated. Linear regression analysis showed no correlation between BMD and serum leptin levels below these points but a significant positive correlation between BMD at the two radius sites and leptin levels above these points. The correlation remained significant after adjustment for BMI, serum PTH and duration of dialysis. Leptin levels were twice as high in female patients and associated with higher BMD Z-scores close to zero. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests a bone-sparing effect of serum leptin in haemodialysis patients only when the serum levels of leptin were higher than the presumed threshold of blood-brain transport saturation. Higher leptin levels in post-menopausal female haemodialysis patients than in male patients may account for their slower bone loss with ageing.

Sevelamer hydrochloride with or without alphacalcidol or higher dialysate calcium vs calcium carbonate in dialysis patients: an open-label, randomized study.

BACKGROUND: Sevelamer hydrochloride was recently proposed as a phosphate binder to prevent hypercalcaemia in place of calcium alkaline salts in dialysis patients. So far, it has been evaluated only in patients receiving calcitriol, without comparison with CaCO(3) alone, although the latter was found to be as effective as the combination of calcitriol and Al(OH)(3) in suppressing parathyroid hormone (PTH) without inducing hypercalcaemia and to have a better lowering effect on serum phosphate. Moreover, this bile salt binder may decrease serum 25-OH vitamin D. Therefore, we compared for 5 months two strategies for controlling moderate hyperparathyroidism: CaCO(3) alone vs sevelamer in conjunction with measures to increase calcium balance. METHODS: Forty-two patients were randomized: 21 continued their treatment with 4.8 g/day CaCO(3) and 21 were switched to sevelamer (initial dose: 2.4 g/day, increased to 4.4 g/day). Each month, when serum-corrected calcium decreased below 2.30 mmol/l, dialysate calcium was increased or alphacalcidol was given at each dialysis session, according to serum PO(4) levels. The following parameters were monitored: serum Ca, PO(4), bicarbonate and protein, weekly; and serum PTH, 25-OH vitamin D and total, LDL and HDL cholesterol monthly. RESULTS: Except for higher serum phosphate at month 1, lower serum bicarbonate at month 2 and lower LDL cholesterol at month 5 in the sevelamer group, no difference was found between the two groups. Compared with baseline levels, PTH increased and 25-OH vitamin D decreased significantly in both groups, these two parameters being inversely correlated. CONCLUSIONS: Given comparable control of plasma calcium, phosphate and 25-OH vitamin D, PTH control is comparable in both strategies. Sevelamer does not induce greater vitamin D depletion than CaCO(3). The transient decrease of serum bicarbonate after discontinuation of CaCO(3) in the sevelamer group suggests a less optimal prevention of acidosis. The sevelamer-induced decrease in LDL cholesterol gives this drug a potential advantage in cardiovascular prevention.

Fenofibrate increases creatininemia by increasing metabolic production of creatinine.

Fenofibrate is a potent hypolipemic agent, widely used in patients with renal insufficiency in whom dyslipidemia is frequent. A moderate reversible increase in creatinine plasma levels is an established side effect of fenofibrate therapy, which mechanism remains unknown. We have previously reported that in 13 patients with normal renal function or moderate renal insufficiency, two weeks of fenofibrate therapy increased creatininemia without any changes in renal plasma flow and glomerular filtration rate [1]. In 13 additional patients, muscular enzymes (AST, GPT, CPK, LDH) and myoglobin were measured before and after 2 weeks on fenofibrate, and the values of creatininemia obtained by the Jaffé technique and HPLC were compared. CPK and AST activity and plasma myoglobin increased in 2 patients with fenofibrate, but muscular enzymes remained unchanged in the population as a whole, and were not correlated to the changes in creatininemia. The changes in creatininemia induced by fenofibrate measured by the Jaffé technique were strongly correlated to those measured by HPLC (r(2) = 0.675, p = 0.0006). Analysis of the pooled data of the two arms of the study showed in 26 patients that two weeks of fenofibrate therapy efficiently reduced total cholesterol and triglycerides plasma levels, and raised creatininemia from 139 +/- 8 to 160 +/- 10 micromol/l (p < 0.0001), but confirmed that creatininuria also increased to the extent that creatinine clearance remained unchanged (68 +/- 6 vs. 67 +/- 6 ml/min, n.s.). It is concluded that the increase in creatininemia induced by fenofibrate in renal patients does not reflect an impairment of renal function, nor an alteration of tubular creatinine secretion, and is not falsely increased by a dosage interference. Fenofibrate-induced increase of daily creatinine production is neither readily explained by accelerated muscular cell lysis. It is proposed that fenofibrate increases the metabolic production rate of creatinine.